Brief reportClinical Faxed Referrals to a Tobacco Quitline: Reach, Enrollment, and Participant Characteristics
Introduction
Healthcare providers are uniquely positioned to link tobacco users with treatment services to help them quit. A majority of smokers visit a healthcare provider each year,1, 2 and physician advice is positively associated with smokers' intentions to quit.3 Clinical guidelines recommend that all healthcare providers implement the 5A's with each patient: (1) ask about tobacco use; (2) advise to quit; (3) assess willingness to make a quit attempt; (4) assist in quit attempt or (for those unwilling to quit) in increasing motivation to quit; and (5) arrange for follow-up.4
Although the ask and advise steps are implemented relatively often,5, 6 only 20%–40% of smokers report receiving assistance for tobacco cessation during a visit to their healthcare provider.1, 6, 7 Providers' barriers include lack of time, inconvenience, and lack of reimbursement for cessation services.8
A feasible and sustainable alternative is to have providers implement the first two or three steps and then refer patients to existing cessation services such as telephone counseling.9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 Proactive telephone counseling, such as that provided by quitlines, increases considerably the odds of quitting over self-help materials or brief advice, and, when combined with pharmacotherapy, increases the odds over pharmacotherapy alone.15
Despite the theoretical appeal of provider-faxed referrals to telephone quitlines, few studies have evaluated this implementation in real-world settings rather than experimental, clinical ones.10, 16, 17, 18, 19 Observational studies have lacked details about enrollment rates and sustainability.13, 20 The current study describes reach rates, enrollment rates, and enrollee characteristics for faxed referrals to the Ohio Tobacco Quit Line between June 2006 and October 2007.
Section snippets
Intervention
The Ohio Tobacco Quit Line began providing services statewide in September 2004. A provider-faxed referral process was introduced in the first year; by the second year, an average of 68 referrals was received per month. Starting in May 2006, the Ohio Tobacco Prevention Foundation implemented three programs to increase provider-faxed referrals: (1) a hospital-based program (Outreach) that trained staff at 43 participating hospitals; (2) a direct-marketing initiative (Fax Five) aimed at
Reach and Enrollment Rates
The Quit Line received a total of 6951 faxed referrals between June 1, 2006, and October 31, 2007. An average of 412 referrals was received per month, ranging from 147 in the first month to 419 in the last month, and peaking at 734 in May 2007. Fewer than 3% (n=205) were repeats for an individual; 15.3% were from the Fax Five program, 27.6% were from the Outreach program, 28.1% were from the Community Grants program, and 29.0% were not identified with a specific initiative.
Fewer than one fourth
Discussion
Multiple promotional strategies increased the average monthly number of faxed referrals to a state quitline from 68 to 412. Fax-referred enrollees reported lower SES (e.g., less education, lack of insurance) than nonfax-referred enrollees. In general, lower-SES smokers are less likely to use cessation aids such as pharmacotherapy23 or to receive assistance in quitting from their healthcare provider.7 The potential of faxed-referral programs to reach these smokers should be explored.
The
Conclusion
Faxing referrals to quitlines provides a convenient way for healthcare providers to assist tobacco users, an effective recruitment strategy for quitlines, and possibly a way to reach lower-SES tobacco users. Promotional activities can increase faxed referrals, although enrollment rates may be low. Additional research is needed to improve the efficiency of faxed-referral programs, confirm the extent to which they recruit harder-to-reach populations, and determine whether faxed-referral
References (23)
- et al.
Nondaily smokers should be asked and advised to quit
Am J Prev Med
(2006) - et al.
Physician advice about smoking and drinking: are U.S. adults being informed?
Am J Prev Med
(2003) - et al.
Are physicians asking about tobacco use and assisting with cessation? Results from the 2001–2004 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS)
Prev Med
(2006) - et al.
The feasibility of connecting physician offices to a state-level tobacco quit line
Am J Prev Med
(2006) Increasing the demand for and use of effective smoking-cessation treatments: reaping the full health benefits of tobacco-control science and policy gains—in our lifetime
Am J Prev Med
(2007)- et al.
Tobacco use quitline enrollment through dental practices: a pilot study
J Am Dent Assoc
(2007) - et al.
Ohio adult tobacco report: 2006 adult tobacco survey
(2007) - et al.
Racial/ethnic disparities in report of physician-provided smoking cessation advice: analysis of the 2000 National Health Interview Survey
Am J Public Health
(2006) - et al.
Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update
(2008) - et al.
Socioeconomic disparity in provider-delivered assistance to quit smoking
Nicotine Tob Res
(2008)
Primary care provider attitudes are associated with smoking cessation counseling and referral
Med Care
Cited by (51)
A comprehensive electronic health record-enabled smoking treatment program: Evaluating reach and effectiveness in primary care in a multiple baseline design
2022, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :These barriers have led to ask-advise-refer/connect approaches that shift the task of providing cessation treatment to external services, such as tobacco quitlines (Bentz et al., 2006). Unfortunately, results show little use of such referrals by clinic staff (Adsit et al., 2014; Fiore et al., 2019; Sheffer et al., 2012) and low rates (<30%) of enrollment in quitline services among referred patients (Leuthard et al., 2015; Wadland et al., 2007; Willett et al., 2009). Electronic health record (EHR) tools can prompt primary care teams to assess smoking status and refer patients to treatment resources.
Closed-Loop Electronic Referral From Primary Care Clinics to a State Tobacco Cessation Quitline: Effects Using Real-World Implementation Training
2021, American Journal of Preventive MedicineQuitline program utilization and cessation outcomes: A comparison of provider-referred clients by healthcare settings
2019, Preventive Medicine ReportsCitation Excerpt :With at least 70% of tobacco users visiting a healthcare provider annually and a majority of whom have contemplated quitting (Jamal et al., 2012); healthcare providers are uniquely positioned to leverage healthcare encounters as opportunities to assess for tobacco use and refer patients to quitline services. In an attempt to increase reach to disparate groups of smokers, quitlines support healthcare provider-referral programs as a complementary and cost-efficient model beyond traditional media marketing and self-referral models (Willett et al., 2009; Woods and Haskins, 2007). A growing body of literature examining in-program differences (e.g., medication use, number of telephone counseling sessions, quit outcomes) for callers entering quitline services by varying sources (provider-referred vs. self-referred) has yielded mixed results.
Prevalence and predictors of quitline enrollment following hospital referral in real-world clinical practice
2019, Journal of Substance Abuse TreatmentLong-term Quit Rates in Fax-Referred as Compared to Self-Referred Tobacco Quitline Registrants
2017, American Journal of Preventive Medicine