Research article
Social Inequalities in Food Exposure Around Schools in an Urban Area

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.014Get rights and content

Background

The obesity epidemic among children and youth, and the social gradient in this relationship, could be related to differential exposure to food sources in primary environments. Although the positive association between area-level deprivation and fast-food outlets offering high-calorie foods has been well documented, few studies have evaluated food sources around school settings.

Purpose

This study evaluated the relationships among food sources around schools, neighborhood income, and commercial density.

Methods

A GIS was used to derive measures of exposure to fast-food outlets, fruit and vegetable stores, and full-service restaurants near primary and secondary schools in Montreal, Canada, in 2005. Food source availability was analyzed in 2009 in relation to neighborhood income for the area around schools, accounting for commercial density.

Results

For the 1168 schools identified, strong neighborhood income gradients were observed in relation to food sources. Relative to the highest income–quartile schools, the odds of a fast-food outlet being located within 750 m of a low income–quartile school was 30.9 (95% CI=19.6, 48.9). Similar relationships were observed for full-service restaurants (OR=77, 95% CI=35, 169.3) and fruit and vegetable stores (OR=29.6, 95% CI=18.8, 46.7). These associations were reduced, but remained significant in models accounting for commercial density.

Conclusions

Food source exposure around schools is inversely associated with neighborhood income, but commercial density partly accounts for this association. Further research is necessary to document food consumption among youth attending schools in relation to nearby food source opportunities.

Introduction

Overweight and obesity are increasing at unprecedented rates among children and adolescents,1, 2, 3 particularly among socially disadvantaged populations.4 In response, researchers are seeking to unravel the role of environmental factors in the pathways leading to obesity.5, 6, 7 Studies on children and youth have demonstrated positive associations among caloric consumption, overweight, and obesity.8 Rising caloric intake among youth9 is underpinned by growing consumption of out-of-home prepared10 energy-dense processed food,11, 12 fast food,13 and soft drinks,14 and fast-food consumption is related to adverse metabolic outcomes among youth.15, 16, 17, 18 Children and adolescents spend a substantial amount of time at schools, and the role of the food environment around schools particularly as it varies with SES may be relevant to understanding the obesity epidemic for this age group.9 Schools have some control over their interior food environments,19 but food opportunities around schools and along home–school routes may contribute to obesity as well as social gradients in obesity among youth.

It is established that SES gradients exist in access to fast-food outlets. Such associations have been widely observed20 in the U.S.,21, 22, 23 England and Scotland,24, 25 Australia,26 and New Zealand.27 Studies28, 29, 30 evaluating SES gradients in food store accessibility are less clear. School-level analyses of SES and food accessibility are limited and indeterminate. A study31 of 31,622 U.S. middle and high schools found a positive association between school-area material deprivation and restaurant presence within 400 m. A longitudinal U.S. study32 found no relationship between BMI change and density of food stores around children's schools.

A New Zealand national study33 found no clear relationship between school-area deprivation and distance from schools to fast-food outlets27; however, an analysis of a subsample of 406 schools showed a strong SES gradient. A Quebec Province study34 indicated an SES gradient in access to fast-food chains but not to convenience stores for urban or rural areas. A study on 188 schools in Canada35 found no overall SES gradient in food accessibility within 1 km of schools, but it did observe such a gradient for full-service restaurants. In this study,36 most associations observed within 5 km disappeared once population density was considered. Density was a confounding variable in other cases.31 In Los Angeles, an inverse association between income and fast-food outlets within 400 m of a school was apparent for high–commercial density areas only.37

Few studies have evaluated school-level environmental factors in relation to consumption and overweight among youth. One study38 indicated that school-level exposure to fast-food outlets was associated with a lower consumption of fruits and vegetables, more soda, and overweight (OR=1.06) or obesity (OR=1.07). A longitudinal study32 over 3 years in the U.S. found no association between school-area food store density and change in BMI among kindergarten children. Other data39 from Canada indicate no association between exposure to various types of food retailers in school neighborhoods and overweight among school-aged youth.

Most studies on SES gradients in food accessibility around schools have considered fast-food outlets only, with some studies suggesting confounding by population or commercial density. This study aimed to determine the associations between area income and accessibility to three types of food sources around primary and secondary schools, specifically fast-food outlets (FFO) offering high-calorie foods considered unhealthful; full-service restaurants (RST) offering mixed-choice food sets; and fruit and vegetable stores (FVS) offering mainly healthful choices. Commercial density was tested as a potential confounding factor of the income–exposure relationships.

Section snippets

Methods

The study region was the Montreal Urban Community (MUC; 3.4 million inhabitants; 2001 Canada Census). Data were obtained using a GIS developed for population health research and surveillance in Montreal, Quebec.40

A listing of all primary and secondary schools was obtained from the Ministry of Education41 and geocoded at the address level. For the MUC, a total of 828 primary and 340 secondary schools were available for analysis (1168 schools overall). A road-network buffer of 750 m was

Results

Descriptive statistics are provided in Table 1. The proportion of the 1168 schools with one or more stores within 750 m in each category was 50.4% for FFOs, 72.9% for RST, 57.4% for FVS, and 50.4% for HRD. ANOVA analyses revealed significant differences (p<0.05) in average distance, presence of, and average number of food stores and HRD within 750 m, except for the number of restaurants, for which no difference by income quartiles was detected within high-density areas. Comparing schools in the

Discussion

This school-based study showed high accessibility to FFO, RST, FVS, and HRD and revealed striking density and income differentials. Schools of the lowest income quartile had ten times more stores within 750 m than schools in the highest income quartile. Consequently, 1 of 2 schools was located near an FFO, but this proportion was 81% in the most deprived areas and 12% in the most affluent areas. Accessibility gradients by income and commercial density were similar for RST, FVS, and HRD. These

References (58)

  • J. Pearce et al.

    Neighborhood deprivation and access to fast-food retailing: a national study

    Am J Prev Med

    (2007)
  • R. Sturm

    Disparities in the food environment surrounding U.S. middle and high schools

    Public Health

    (2008)
  • R. Sturm et al.

    Body mass index in elementary school children, metropolitan area food prices and food outlet density

    Public Health

    (2005)
  • L.M. Seliske et al.

    Density and type of food retailers surrounding Canadian schools: variations across socioeconomic status

    Health Place

    (2009)
  • P.A. Simon et al.

    Proximity of fast food restaurants to schools: do neighborhood income and type of school matter?

    Prev Med

    (2008)
  • H.L. Cooper et al.

    Geographic approaches to quantifying the risk environment: drug-related law enforcement and access to syringe exchange programmes

    Int J Drug Policy

    (2009)
  • A. Drewnowski

    Obesity and the food environment: dietary energy density and diet costs

    Am J Prev Med

    (2004)
  • S. Cummins

    Neighbourhood food environment and diet: time for improved conceptual models?

    Prev Med

    (2007)
  • G.M. Torrance et al.

    Trends in overweight and obesity among adults in Canada (1970–1992): evidence from national surveys using measured height and weight

    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord

    (2002)
  • P.M. Anderson et al.

    Childhood obesity: trends and potential causes

    Future Child

    (2006)
  • Y. Peng

    Canadian consumer trends in obesity and food consumption

    (2004)
  • L.N. Oliver et al.

    Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and the prevalence of overweight Canadian children and youth

    Can J Public Health

    (2005)
  • M.C. Wang et al.

    Socioeconomic and food-related physical characteristics of the neighbourhood environment are associated with body mass index

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (2007)
  • J.O. Hill et al.

    Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here?

    Science

    (2003)
  • K.D. Brownell

    The environment and obesity

  • K. Raine

    Overweight and obesity in Canada: a population health perspective: Canadian Population Health Initiative (CPHI)

    (August 2004)
  • S.A. French et al.

    Environmental influences on eating and physical activity

    Annu Rev Public Health

    (2001)
  • Food CPI, prices and expenditures: food expenditure tables

    (2007)
  • S.A. Bowman et al.

    Effects of fast food consumption on energy intake and diet quality among children in a national household survey

    Pediatrics

    (2004)
  • Cited by (80)

    • Changes in Fast Food Outlet Availability Near Schools: Unequal Patterns by Income, Race/Ethnicity, and Urbanicity

      2019, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      It remains unclear whether such increases have occurred evenly across neighborhoods based on income, race/ethnicity, and urbanicity. Cross-sectional studies using nationwide U.S. data10,23 and data within single cities (such as New York,24 Chicago,14 Montreal,25 and Adelaide26) and Los Angeles County27 found greater FFR concentrations among schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods than among schools in affluent neighborhoods,9,10,23–26 although one study did not find this pattern.28 Furthermore, most, though not all,10 studies have observed greater FFR concentrations near majority Latino and African American schools relative to schools attended by majority white students,13,29–31 and greater FFR densities near schools in urban versus nonurban areas.10

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text