Review and special articlePhysical Activity and Physical Fitness: Standardizing Assessment with the PhenX Toolkit
Introduction
During the past 60 years, data have continued to accumulate, demonstrating numerous health benefits of a physically active lifestyle throughout the life span and the health advantages of being physically fit.1, 2, 3 Further, PA/PF increasingly are being recognized as important exposure variables when evaluating gene–environment interactions to determine risk for major chronic diseases. However, there is general agreement that most studies investigating the combined role of genetics and PA/PF on health and performance outcomes have been severely limited because of inadequate sample size.4, 5, 6 The ability of researchers to combine data across studies could increase the statistical power to associate phenotypic, environmental, and genetic data with disease outcomes, enhancing the opportunity to identify meaningful results that previously might have gone undetected. Also, standardized measurement methodologies facilitate replication of study findings and the comparison of data collected during studies of various population subsets.
A portfolio analysis of grants funded by the National Cancer Institute highlighted the need for guidance and resources for physical activity assessment. Grants funded between September 2004 and January 2009 that measured physical activity as an exposure, outcome, or covariate were reviewed for details about assessment method. The 87 grants identified were sorted by study design and use of physical activity measure (exposure, outcome, or covariate). These grants used 33 different self-report measures and at least six different accelerometer-based devices and pedometers.
In several cases, instruments that were not suited to the needs of the study design were used (Heather Bowles, PhD, National Cancer Institute, personal communication, 2010). For example, a surveillance instrument intended to characterize the activity level of a population might be used inappropriately to assess change in activity in a clinical trial with physical activity as a primary outcome. This diversity of methods presents a serious challenge for contrasting or combining study data in a uniform manner. This paper describes the development and content of the PA/PF domain within the Phenotypes and eXposures (PhenX) Toolkit. PhenX is a source for standardized measures across a variety of content areas and is described in general before focusing on the details of the PA/PF domain.
Section snippets
The PhenX Toolkit
The PhenX Toolkit was developed as a source of high-priority, low-burden, and evidence-based measures for use by a wide variety of researchers.7, 8 Although investigators are likely to be knowledgeable in selecting and implementing measures in their own content area, they quickly may become overwhelmed by the myriad of measures available in other fields. Further, once a measure is identified, the appropriate implementation of that measure also must be understood.
The PhenX Toolkit provides
Results
The WG identified 14 measures (Table 1) that can be classified as metrics of PA/PF, mediators or moderators of activity, and a precursor to fitness assessment. Under metrics of physical activity, measures selected were a short physical activity screener, a comprehensive reported measure, and a comprehensive objective measure, as well as an objective measure of walking and a reported measure of sitting. Metrics of fitness included performance-based measures of integrated fitness (endurance,
Discussion
In the process of selecting measures and protocols for the PA/PF domain in the PhenX Toolkit, a number of issues needed to be addressed. It quickly became apparent that for a number of well-established measurement tools used to assess PA/PF in published studies with a health orientation, data documenting validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change were limited or lacking. This was especially true when the goal was to evaluate the physical activity of individuals instead of groups.
Even for
Other Physical Activity Measurement Resources for Use by Investigators
In addition to the PhenX Toolkit, several other resources for assisting investigators with their measurement of physical activity recently have been made available. In July 2009 an NIH-sponsored workshop titled “Assessment of Physical Activity Using Wearable Monitors: Best Practices for Monitor Calibration and Use” was held, with the proceedings published as a supplement to Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise.31 This report provides a comprehensive discussion of many of the measurement
Conclusion
Although the inclusion of PA/PF measures and protocols in the PhenX Toolkit will aid investigators in combining data across genomewide association studies, these measures have the potential for a broader application by researchers in multiple disciplines. Investigators planning genetic, clinical trial, or epidemiologic studies in disciplines ranging from cancer to diabetes to cardiovascular health, or even obesity, can benefit from the inclusion of PhenX PA/PF measures. As healthcare
References (35)
- et al.
Assessing cardiorespiratory fitness without performing exercise testing
Am J Prev Med
(2005) - et al.
Neighborhood environments and physical activity among adults in 11 countries
Am J Prev Med
(2009) - et al.
Factorial validity and invariance of questionnaires measuring social-cognitive determinants of physical activity among adolescent girls
Prev Med
(2000) - et al.
The reliability of the Adolescent Sedentary Activity Questionnaire (ASAQ)
Prev Med
(2007) - et al.
Validation of the Stanford 7-Day Recall to assess habitual physical activity
Ann Epidemiol
(2001) Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee report, 2008
- et al.
Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and womena meta-analysis
JAMA
(2009) - et al.
Cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiovascular risk of cardiovascular disease mortality
Circulation
(2011) Is it time to change the ground rules of exercise-related genomics research?
Med Sci Sports Exerc
(2011)- et al.
Genomic predictors of maximal oxygen uptake response to standardized exercise training programs
J Appl Physiol
(2011)
Advances in exercise, fitness, and performance genomics in 2010
Med Sci Sports Exerc
The PhenX toolkit: get the most from your measures
Am J Epidemiol
PhenX: a toolkit for interdisciplinary genetic research
Curr Opin Lipidol
Estimation of VO2 max from a one-mile track walk, gender, age and body weight
Med Sci Sports Exerc
Development of a single-stage submaximal treadmill walking test
Med Sci Sports Exerc
The Presidents Challenge Adult Fitness Test
Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults
J Aging Phys Act
Cited by (13)
Innovative methods for improving measures of the personal environment
2012, American Journal of Preventive MedicineComparison of diet, muscle strength, steps per day and symptoms in people with HIV and HIV-negative peers
2022, Research in Nursing and HealthThe PROSPER-HIV Study: A Research Protocol to Examine Relationships Among Physical Activity, Diet Intake, and Symptoms in Adults Living With HIV
2020, Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS CareImpact of Perceived Cardiovascular Risk on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Behaviors in People with and without HIV Infection
2020, Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency SyndromesThe Effect of an HIV Self-Management Intervention on Neurocognitive Behavioral Processing
2019, Western Journal of Nursing Research
This activity is available for CME credit. See page A4 for information.