Sexual selection in mosquito swarms: may the best man lose?
Section snippets
Rearing
We studied A. gambiae sensu stricto mosquitoes from a population at the Ifakara Health Research and Development (IHRDC), Tanzania. This population was established from a wild population near Njage village, Tanzania, in 1996. We randomly assigned first-instar larvae to one of three food quantity treatments: 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg or 0.4 mg of dried fish food (Tetramin, Melle, Germany) per larva per day (Lyimo et al. 1992). Larvae of the same food treatment were housed together in groups of 100 in standard
RESULTS
By varying larval food, we succeeded in generating three distinct adult male phenotypes, which differed with respect to each of the male traits we measured. First, body size varied substantially between groups (GLM: F2,234 = 94. 128, P < 0.01; Fig. 1), with males from the high food treatment being 18% and 9% bigger than those in the low and medium food treatments, respectively (low food: 2.49 ± 0.015 mm; medium food: 2.69 ± 0.014 mm; high food: 2.94 ± 0.01 mm). The average size of females used in these
DISCUSSION
The mating success of male A. gambiae mosquitoes within swarms in our study was not random, but depended on nutrient uptake during larval development and its impact on adult body size. Contrary to expectation, we observed that the ‘best male’ with respect to frequently observed predictors of male insect fitness (longevity, body size and energy reserves) was not the most competitive in acquiring females within a mating swarm. Instead, we observed that males most likely to win females were those
Acknowledgments
We express our sincere gratitude to Japhet Kihonda, Nicolas Kasigudi and Hassani Ngonyani from the IHRDC Public Health Entomology section and thank the IHRDC, University of Dar es Salaam and Wageningen University for institutional support. This work was supported by a VIDI grant (no. 864.03.004) awarded by the Dutch Scientific Organization (NWO) to B.G.J.K. and a project grant from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA/URT 13295) and BBSRC David Phillips Fellowship to H.M.F.
References (56)
The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
(1997)- et al.
Female mate choice for large males in several species of seaweed fly (Diptera: Coelopidae)
Animal Behaviour
(2000) Causes of assortative mating in arthropods
Animal Behaviour
(1989)- et al.
Redressing the sex imbalance in knowledge of vector biology
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
(2005) - et al.
Genetic contribution to variation in larval development time, adult size, and longevity of starved adults of Anopheles gambiae
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
(2006) - et al.
Predator-prey interactions on the wing: aerobatics and body size among dance flies and midges
Animal Behaviour
(2003) - et al.
Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later?
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
(2001) - et al.
Lifetime mating success of male fruitflies (Drosophila melanogaster) is related to their size
Animal Behaviour
(1983) The relation between male body size, fighting, and mating success in Dawson's burrowing bee, Amergilla dawsoni (Apidae, Apinae, Anthopthorini)
Journal of Zoology
(1996)- et al.
Prey size selection by carnivorous stoneflies
Limnology and Oceanography
(1987)
Sexual selection, natural selection, and quality advertisement
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Sexual Selection
Optimal life stage for radiation sterilization of Anopheles males and their fitness for release
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small?
Quarterly Review of Biology
Behavioral causes and consequences of sexual size dimorphism
Ethology
Sexual selection on morphological and physiological traits and fluctuating asymmetry in the black scavenger fly Sepsis cynipsea
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Virus-expressed, recombinant single-chain antibody blocks sporozoite infection of salivary glands in Plasmodium gallinaceum-infected Aedes aegypti
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
May the force be with you: measuring mosquito fitness in the field
Mating in the mosquito, Anopheles gambiae s. l. II. Swarming behaviour
Physiological Entomology
The swarming and mating behaviour of Anopheles gambiae s.s. (Diptera: Culicidae) from Sao Tome Island
Journal of Vector Ecology
Male size does not affect mating success of Anopheles gambiae in Sao Tome
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
Observations on the swarming and mating behaviour of Anopheles funestus from southern Mozambique
Malaria Journal
The Biology of Mosquitoes: Development, Nutrition and Reproduction
Mating in a viscous universe: the race is to the agile, not to the swift
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B
Male larval nutrition influences the reproductive success of both sexes of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Functional Ecology
The swarming and mating flight of the Diptera
Annual Review of Entomology
Engineering RNA interference-based resistance to dengue virus type 2 in genetically modified Aedes aegypti
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A.
Interactions between swarming Chironomus annularius (Diptera: Chironomidae) males: role of acoustic behavior
Journal of Insect Behavior
Cited by (0)
- 1
G. Nkwengulila is at the University of Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 35064 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
- 2
B. G. J. Knols is at the Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 8031, 6700 EH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
- 3
G. F. Killeen is at Ifakara Health Research and Development Centre Coordination Office, P.O. Box 78373, Kiko Avenue, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
- 4
H. M. Ferguson is at the Division of Immunity & Infection, and Division of Environmental & Evolutionary Biology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, U.K.