Toxicology/original research
Trends in γ-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and Related Drug Intoxication: 1999 to 2003

Presented as a poster at the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists (EAPCCT) international conference, May 2005, Berlin, Germany. In conjunction with this meeting, it was published in abstract form in Clinical Toxicology. [Dyer JE, Anderson IB, Kim SY, et al. Reports of GHB and related drug exposures in California: A 5 year review of Poison Control Center Data. [abstract]. Clinical Toxicology. 2005;43:520.]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.10.012Get rights and content

Study objective

To analyze changes in γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) case reporting, we review GHB or congener drug cases reported to the California Poison Control System, comparing these to other data sets.

Methods

We identified cases from the California Poison Control System computerized database using standardized codes and key terms for GHB and congener drugs (“gamma butyrolactone,” “1,4-butanediol,” “gamma valerolactone”). We noted California Poison Control System date, caller and exposure site, patient age and sex, reported coingestions, and outcomes. We compared California Poison Control System data to case incidence from American Association of Poison Control Centers and Drug Abuse Warning Network data and drug use prevalence from National Institute for Drug Abuse survey data.

Results

A total of 1,331 patients were included over the 5-year period (1999-2003). California Poison Control System–reported GHB exposures decreased by 76% from baseline (n=426) to the final study year (n=101). The absolute decrease was present across all case types, although there was a significant proportional decrease in routine drug abuse cases and an increase in malicious events, including GHB-facilitated sexual assault (P=.002). American Association of Poison Control Centers data showed a similar decrease from 2001 to 2003. Drug Abuse Warning Network incidence flattened from 2001 to 2002 and decreased sharply in 2003. National Institute for Drug Abuse survey time trends were inconsistent across age groups.

Conclusion

Based on the precipitous decrease in California Poison Control System case incidence for GHB during 5 years, the parallel trend in American Association of Poison Control Centers data, and a more recent decrease in Drug Abuse Warning Network cases, a true decrease in case incidence is likely. This could be due to decreased abuse rates or because fewer abusers seek emergency medical care. Case reporting may account for part of the decrease in the incidence of poison center contacts involving GHB.

Introduction

Since the first reports of γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) abuse appeared in the early 1990s, this illicit drug has manifested changing use patterns marked by differing at-risk populations, forms of administration (including substitution of chemical congener precursors and analogs), and types of associated adverse effects. GHB was initially marketed as a dietary supplement in health food stores and later was promoted on the Internet as a safe agent for use by bodybuilders. It has also been touted for treating a variety of medical disorders, including insomnia, obesity, depression, alcohol addiction, and sexual dysfunction.1 GHB use in the general population broadened greatly as it became known as a party drug.2 It also gained a reputation as a date rape drug and has been implicated in a number of criminal drug-facilitated sexual assault cases.3

Editor’s Capsule Summary

What is already known on this topic

Initially marketed as a dietary supplement, γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is a popular party drug. It is also available under strict controls as a US Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment for narcolepsy.

What question this study addressed

A rapid and marked decrease in the number of cases involving GHB managed by the California Poison Control System was noted. The cause of this decrease was sought by analyzing national poisoning data, as well as other sources about the use of GHB.

What this study adds to our knowledge

The incidence of GHB use as reflected by these signal detection systems suggests that the misuse and abuse of GHB may be decreasing. Although the number of cases reported by these mechanisms has decreased dramatically, the proportion of cases involving malicious intent (attempted rape) increased.

How this might change clinical practice

When GHB intoxication occurs, specifically soliciting information about malicious events may be prudent. Involvement of law enforcement and maintenance of chain of custody may be prudent.

The heterogeneous acute and chronic effects (including drug withdrawal) associated with GHB and its principal congeners, γ-butyrolactone and 1,4-butanediol, are well described in the literature.4, 5 Fewer data are available concerning a more recently introduced GHB congener, γ-valerolactone. We noted empirically a steep decrease in GHB-related calls to the California Poison Control System. Systematically confirming this potential change is important for the purposes of emergency medical care planning and delivery. In addition, the patterns of incidence among specific subgroups of GHB users could be relevant for targeting prevention and treatment interventions (eg, GHB-dependent users presenting to the emergency department [ED] in need of drug withdrawal management).

Patterns of GHB abuse have not been systematically analyzed. This study of GHB and related drug cases reported to the California Poison Control System was conducted in order to test the hypothesis that the incidence of GHB was changing over the study period. Specifically, we hypothesized that key demographic and clinical characteristics of the cases would demonstrate a systematic (nonrandom) pattern of decreasing incidence that might affect certain subgroups more than others (for example, by sex, by case severity, or by calls originating from health care centers compared to the general public). We further hypothesized that specific subsets of GHB California Poison Control System reports (such as those experiencing a GHB withdrawal syndrome or patients maliciously poisoned) would have differing characteristics potentially related to changing case incidence.

Section snippets

Study Design and Setting

We retrospectively reviewed case records reported to the California Poison Control System involving suspected exposures to GHB or its congeners (precursors and analogs), principally γ-butyrolactone, 1,4-butanediol, and γ-valerolactone. Throughout this paper, the term GHB will refer to gamma hydroxybutyrate as well as these congeners, because in clinical practice it is not typically possible to identify with precision the specific compound that has been ingested. We also separately enumerated

Characteristics of Study Subjects

Table 1 summarizes case record identification, ineligible cases, and exclusions. In total, 589 cases were excluded. Of these exclusions, 484 (82%) were case records that involved no apparent exposure (information requests only; analyzed separately). In total, 1,331 exposure case records were ultimately included in the analysis of exposure-related cases (Table 1). Only 6 (0.45%) case records included were identified using an assault history and narrative descriptive alone, rather than from the

Limitations

The majority of cases lacked laboratory confirmation of GHB. GHB analysis is not routinely available at hospitals. Exogenous GHB administration undergoes rapid elimination, resulting in levels that cannot be differentiated from “background” blood and urine levels within 6 to 12 hours, respectively, severely limiting analysis in delayed presentation. Because of limitations in toxicologic confirmation, the cases tallied in this study may underestimate the true case incidence. The lag time before

Discussion

We observed a precipitous decrease in GHB exposures reported to the California Poison Control System for 1999 through 2003, which parallels decreasing GHB exposures reported nationally through the American Association of Poison Control Centers during 2001 to 2003 and is consistent with the overall trend in Drug Abuse Warning Network data in 2002 to 2003, although not from earlier years. In contrast, National Institute for Drug Abuse survey data on GHB use among high school students did not

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (68)

  • Determination of endogenous GHB levels in chest and pubic hair

    2021, Forensic Science International
    Citation Excerpt :

    Since its synthesis in 1960, GHB has been used as anaesthetic agent and later it found application in treatment of narcolepsy with cataplexy, alcohol withdrawal syndrome and alcohol dependence [10,11]. GHB is also used out of medical prescription as enhancer of muscle mass in body building practices and as psychoactive drug for recreational purposes [12–14]. Besides these uses, GHB can be also employed as date rape drug in DFSA for its organoleptic features and psychoactive effects [12,15,16].

  • Unity in diversity: A systematic review on the GHB using population

    2021, International Journal of Drug Policy
    Citation Excerpt :

    The findings of this study have to be seen in light of some limitations, resulting in knowledge gaps and related recommendations for future studies. First, about half of the studies included less than a hundred subjects (45%), and the range between studies is large: between 7 (Boyce et al., 2000) and 1331 subjects (Anderson et al., 2006). We did not correct for these differences and this could have biased our results.

  • GHB-involved crimes among intoxicated patients

    2017, Forensic Science International
    Citation Excerpt :

    Demographic characteristics of the assessed cases showed that the sex ratio of GHB-intoxicated patients is rather balanced, except for the cases of unintentional GHB intake, where the rate of female patients was significantly higher than that of males. We found a similar mean age than other studies that assessed samples of GHB users [24–28], however our sample consisted of not only voluntary GHB users, but victims of GHB-involved sexual assaults and acquisitory crimes as well. Therefore the result that the majority of the patients were in their twenties can also be explained by the fact that this is also the typical mean age of party-goers who consume psychoactive substances during these recreational events [29,30], which can be interpret as a risk factor for enduring the above mentioned GHB-involved offences as well.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supervising editor: Richard C. Dart, MD, PhD

Author contributions: IBA, SYK, JED, and PDB conceived the study and obtained research funding. IBA coordinated and supervised all aspects of the project and, along with SYK, drafted the manuscript. SYK, JED, CBB, and JCI assisted in study design and data collection. SYK and CBB assisted in data analysis. SYK led the writing of the manuscript. JED conceptualized ideas and edited the manuscript. MJW assisted with data collection and manuscript review; PDB was the overall medical advisor for the project, analyzed data, and played a vital role in editing the manuscript. IBA takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

Funding and support: The research is funded by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Approval NIDA 1 RO1 DA 14935-02A. The University of California, San Francisco, Committee on Human Research approved the study.

View full text