Original articleAn Integrated Motor Imagery Program to Improve Functional Task Performance in Neurorehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Section snippets
Methods
This was a phase II exploratory RCT with masked assessment and 2 parallel groups. Both groups received task-specific physiotherapy and occupational therapy provided by their own therapists, as usual. Patients in the experimental group were additionally taught how to incorporate motor imagery into usual therapy and into activities practiced outside therapy. This teaching was undertaken within the allocated treatment time (ie, there was no additional therapy contact time). Patients in the control
Results
Patients were recruited from the Oxford Centre for Enablement between February 14, 2008, and January 15, 2009. Figure 1 presents the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flowchart for this study. Of the 77 admitted patients, 7 refused to participate, 1 was uncooperative because of cognitive problems, 34 patients did not fulfill the criteria (14 did not fulfill the criteria for diagnosis; 17 could not complete the Sheffield screening test; 2 did not speak English; 1 was younger than 18y).
Discussion
The study demonstrated low compliance of the therapist and patient with performing motor imagery. As such, we cannot draw conclusions regarding the efficacy of integrating imagery into usual therapy. Future studies will need to explore barriers and facilitators to uptake of this intervention into clinical practice. However, it did show that motor imagery could be successfully integrated into usual therapy and tailored for a range of functional activities (ie, when motor imagery was actually
Conclusions
The novelty of this study compared with the other motor imagery studies is that the treatment involved teaching a strategy to the patient by therapists, rather than focusing on 1 particular task. In principle, teaching a strategy should be more effective and efficient because it can be used to help with many problems. However, our results suggest that we did not teach it very successfully—the patients who received training were no more confident at imagery after training than the control
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients and the therapists at the Oxford Centre for Enablement, Charlotte Winward and Emad El-Yahya for their help in this study, and Joan Warren for her financial support.
References (37)
- et al.
The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2006) - et al.
Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: a randomized controlled trial
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2004) - et al.
Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in the frail elderly
J Clin Epidemiol
(1993) - et al.
Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2005) - et al.
Confounds of insensitivity and blind luck: statistical conclusion validity in stroke rehabilitation clinical trials
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1993) - et al.
Responsiveness of goal attainment scaling in a randomized controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment
J Clin Epidemiol
(2003) - et al.
Motor imagery: the relation between age and imagery capacity
Hum Mov Sci
(2007) Multiple sclerosis: management of multiple sclerosis in primary and secondary care: clinical guideline
(2003)Rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: national clinical guidelines
(2003)National clinical guidelines for stroke
(2004)
Physical management of neurological rehabilitation
Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?
Clin Rehabil
Imagery use in sport: a literature review and applied model
Sports Psychol
Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke?
Stroke
Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
J Neuroeng Rehabil
Training mobility tasks after stroke with combined mental and physical practice: a feasibility study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair
Mental practice in chronic stroke: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Stroke
Cited by (77)
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Mental Practice for the Upper Limb After Stroke: Imagined or Real Benefit?
2021, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationCitation Excerpt :A further limitation to the findings of this review is that no studies comprehensively examined compliance and fidelity to the MP intervention. Others have reported low patient and therapist compliance to MP,67 MP interventions are often not clearly defined,57 and few therapists report using MP as part of therapy for the upper limb after stroke,32 suggesting that the training and practical requirements of implementing MP need to be considered alongside its clinical effectiveness. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that MP can significantly improve activity limitations of the upper limb after stroke and that it appears to be more effective than several other, more frequently used, interventions for the upper limb.
What Adherence Measures Should Be Used in Trials of Home-Based Rehabilitation Interventions? A Systematic Review of the Validity, Reliability, and Acceptability of Measures
2017, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationGOAL ATTAINMENT SCALING IN REHABILITATION: AN EDUCATIONAL REVIEW PROVIDING A COMPREHENSIVE DIDACTICAL TOOL BOX FOR IMPLEMENTING GOAL ATTAINMENT SCALING
2023, Journal of Rehabilitation MedicineInfluence of motor imagery training on hip abductor muscle strength and bilateral transfer effect
2023, Frontiers in PhysiologyMotor Imagery and Mental Practice in the Subacute and Chronic Phases in Upper Limb Rehabilitation after Stroke: A Systematic Review
2023, Occupational Therapy InternationalBody Schema as Assessed by Upper Limb Left/Right Judgment Tasks Is Altered in Stroke: Implications for Motor Imagery Training
2023, Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy
Financial support by Joan Warren (private charity trust).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.
Clinical trial registration number: NCT00618.