Elsevier

Appetite

Volume 56, Issue 2, April 2011, Pages 511-515
Appetite

Research review
Propionate. Anti-obesity and satiety enhancing factor?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Propionate is produced along with acetate and butyrate as a result of fermentative activity of gut microflora on dietary fiber. It has long been known to exhibit hypophagic effects in ruminants, however, its potential physiological roles in non-ruminants as well as humans remained unnoticed over the years. In view of various studies pointing towards the hypophagic as well as hypocholesterolemic effects of propionate in humans, it may act as an important factor in amelioration of obesity, a lifestyle disease arising due to energy imbalance and growing at a startling rate globally. Short chain fatty acids have recently been ascribed as ligands to G-protein coupled receptors (GPRs) 41 and 43. Thus, propionate along with acetate may also be involved in the regulation of adipogenesis and adipokine release mediated via GPRs. The present review summarizes the evidence which collectively raise the possibility of propionate as a dietary factor to depress appetite and combat the obesity epidemic.

Highlights

► The present review focused on: anti-obesity effects of propionate in animals and proposes for similar effects in humans. ► Hypocholesterolemic effects of propionate. ► G-protein coupled receptors and their probable anti-obesity effects by propionate binding.

Introduction

The human gastrointestinal tract is heavily colonized with trillions of microbes encompassing hundreds of species, endowed with a vast array of hydrolases involved in the fermentation of indigestible carbohydrates that escape digestion while traversing the upper gut (Musso, Gambino, & Cassader, 2010). Microbial fermentation of these plant derived polysaccharides reaching the colon in a substantial amount leads to the production of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs). The bacterial load is highest in the colon with 1012 cells/ml of the contents where maximal synthesis of SCFAs occurs. In humans, the daily production rate of SCFAs is 300 mmol/day of which only 10 mmol/day is excreted (Hoverstad, 1986). Thus, a major part of SCFAs is being directed towards colonic absorption ranging between 6 and 12 μmol/cm2/h (Cummings, 1981). The major volatile SCFAs produced are acetate, propionate and butyrate in the ratio of 60:25:15 (Macfarlane & Macfarlane, 2003). The SCFAs so produced are metabolized to provide 60–70% of the energy needs of colonic cells (Topping & Clifton, 2001). Of the three SCFAs, butyrate is the major fuel supplied to colonocytes. Acetate is taken up by the liver for cholesterol synthesis while propionate is the major gluconeogenic substrate in ruminants (Bergman, 1990). However, propionate has been shown to inhibit hepatic cholesterol synthesis in humans (Bugaut & Bentejac, 1993). A number of studies indicate that propionate also plays a role in the regulation of food intake in non-ruminants. The recent discovery of SCFAs as ligands to G-protein coupled receptors (GPRs) and their link to adipogenesis also generated mounting evidence for the role of propionate and other SCFAs in the regulation of obesity (Al-Lahham, Peppelenbosch, Roelofsen, Vonk, & Venema, 2010). With obesity reaching pandemic proportions and inclusion of dietary fiber in the diet being advocated, the role of propionate could be highly significant as a preventive measure to check obesity. The present review will focus exclusively on propionate and its potential to act as a satiety inducing and anti-obesity factor in humans.

Section snippets

Hypophagic effects

Obesity is the disequilibrium between energy intake and energy expenditure. Any factor lowering the energy intake would have a profound effect in the regulation of energy homeostasis. A number of studies show that ruminants exhibit hypophagia upon infusion with sodium propionate (Baile and McLaughlin, 1970, Elliot et al., 1985, Farningham and Whyte, 1993, Forbes, 1988, Leuvenink et al., 1997, Oba and Allen, 2003, Quigley and Heitmann, 1991). The mechanism was proposed to be the existence of the

Cholesterol lowering potential

In ruminants, gluconeogenesis is known to be the fate of absorbed propionate from the portal vein leading to its rapid removal from liver and contributing to the total glucose demands of animals. However, radioisotope studies revealed that propionate inhibits cholesterol synthesis in non-ruminants. This has also been demonstrated in isolated rat hepatocytes using radiolabeled acetate. Demigne et al. (1995) observed the inhibitory effects of propionate on both fatty acid synthesis and to a

G-protein coupled receptors, propionate and adipocytes

In 2003, ligands were discovered for two orphan G-protein coupled receptors, GPR 41 and GPR 43 by two independent groups of workers (Brown et al., 2003, Le et al., 2003). They found that SCFAs act as their ligands which have different potencies for both receptors. While GPR 41 is preferentially activated by propionate followed by butyrate and acetate, GPR 43 has similar specificity for all the three SCFAs. GPR 41 is found to be coupled with Gi/o while GPR 43 with Gq proteins. Upon ligand

References (67)

  • K. Ebihara et al.

    Hypocholesterolemic effect of cecally infused propionic acid in rats fed a cholesterol-free, casein diet

    Nutrition Research

    (1993)
  • J.M. Elliot et al.

    Effect on feed intake of infusing sodium propionate or sodium acetate into a mesenteric vein of cattle

    Journal of Dairy Science

    (1985)
  • H.G. Liljeberg et al.

    Delayed gastric emptying rate as a potential mechanism for lowered glycemia after eating sourdough bread. Studies in humans and rats using test products with added organic acids or an organic salt

    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

    (1996)
  • H.G. Liljeberg et al.

    Sourdough fermentation or addition of organic acids or corresponding salts to bread improves nutritional properties of starch in healthy humans

    Journal of Nutrition

    (1995)
  • M. Mielenz et al.

    Effects of short-term infusion with propionate on the mRNA expression of a putative G-protein coupled receptor 41 (GPR41) in adipose tissue of goats

    Livestock Science

    (2008)
  • P.M. Nishina et al.

    Effects of propionate on lipid biosynthesis in isolated rat hepatocytes

    Journal of Nutrition

    (1990)
  • M. Oba et al.

    Intraruminal infusion of propionate alters feeding behavior and decreases energy intake of lactating dairy cows

    Journal of Nutrition

    (2003)
  • R.M.A.J. Ruijschop et al.

    Satiety effects of a dairy beverage fermented with propionic acid bacteria

    International Dairy Journal

    (2008)
  • T. Todesco et al.

    Propionate lowers blood glucose and alters lipid metabolism in healthy subjects

    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

    (1991)
  • J.A. Vogt et al.

    l-Rhamnose increases serum propionate after long-term supplementation, but lactulose does not raise serum acetate

    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

    (2004)
  • J.A. Vogt et al.

    l-Rhamnose increases serum propionate in humans

    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

    (2004)
  • A. Wang et al.

    Identification and characterization of the bovine G protein-coupled receptor GPR41 and GPR43 genes

    Journal of Dairy Science

    (2009)
  • T.M. Wolever et al.

    Serum acetate:propionate ratio is related to serum cholesterol in men but not women

    Journal of Nutrition

    (1996)
  • T.M. Wolever et al.

    Propionate inhibits incorporation of colonic [1,2-13C]acetate into plasma lipids in humans

    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

    (1995)
  • T.M. Wolever et al.

    Interaction between colonic acetate and propionate in humans

    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

    (1991)
  • M.S. Zaibi et al.

    Roles of GPR41 and GPR43 in leptin secretory responses of murine adipocytes to short chain fatty acids

    FEBS Letters

    (2010)
  • S.H. Al-Lahham et al.

    Regulation of adipokine production in human adipose tissue by propionic acid

    European Journal of Clinical Investigation

    (2010)
  • A. Alvaro et al.

    Gene expression analysis of a human enterocyte cell line reveals downregulation of cholesterol biosynthesis in response to short-chain fatty acids

    IUBMB Life

    (2008)
  • M.H. Anil et al.

    Feeding in sheep during intraportal infusions of short-chain fatty acids and the effect of liver denervation

    The Journal of Physiology

    (1980)
  • M.H. Anil et al.

    The roles of hepatic nerves in the reduction of food intake as a consequence of intraportal sodium propionate administration in sheep

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology

    (1988)
  • F. Backhed et al.

    The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2004)
  • A.M. Berggren et al.

    Influence of orally and rectally administered propionate on cholesterol and glucose metabolism in obese rats

    British Journal of Nutrition

    (1996)
  • E.N. Bergman

    Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species

    Physiological Reviews

    (1990)
  • Cited by (166)

    • Impact of cafeteria diet and n3 supplementation on the intestinal microbiota, fatty acids levels, neuroinflammatory markers and social memory in male rats

      2023, Physiology and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Evidence to date supports that these metabolites provide beneficial rather than harmful effects on obesity and its complications [90,91]. However, a high-carbohydrate diet and obesity can attenuate the binding of SCFAs to GPRs, leading to increased intestinal energy uptake and hepatic lipogenesis [92,93,94]. In addition, it was already shown that rats fed with HFD for four weeks increased acetate levels, stimulating hyperphagia and raising insulin secretion, favoring the augmentation of energy storage and the development of metabolic syndrome [95].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text