Elsevier

Archives of Oral Biology

Volume 55, Issue 9, September 2010, Pages 663-669
Archives of Oral Biology

The effects of tooth extraction on alveolar bone biomechanics in the miniature pig, Sus scrofa

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.05.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

This study investigated the role of occlusion in the development of biomechanical properties of alveolar bone in the miniature pig, Sus scrofa. The hypothesis tested was that the tissues supporting an occluding tooth would show greater stiffness and less strain than that of a non-occluding tooth.

Design

Maxillary teeth opposing the erupting lower first molar (M1) were extracted on one side. Occlusion developed on the contralateral side. Serially administered fluorochrome labels tracked bone mineralisation apposition rate (MAR). A terminal experiment measured in vivo buccal alveolar bone strain on occluding and non-occluding sides during mastication. Ex vivo alveolar strains during occlusal loading were subsequently measured using a materials testing machine (MTS/Sintech). Whole specimen stiffness and principal strains were calculated.

Results

MAR tended to be higher on the extraction side during occlusion. In vivo buccal shear strains were higher in the alveolar bone of the occluding side vs. the extraction side (mean of 471 μɛ vs. 281 μɛ, respectively; p = 0.04); however, ex vivo shear strains showed no significant differences between sides. Stiffness differed between extraction and occlusion side specimens, significantly so in the low load range (344 vs. 668 MPa, respectively; p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Greater in vivo shear strains may indicate more forceful chews on the occluding side, whereas the similarity in ex vivo bone strain magnitude suggests a similarity in alveolar bone structure and occlusal load transmission regardless of occlusal status. The big overall change in specimen stiffness that was observed was likely attributable to differences in the periodontal ligament rather than alveolar bone.

Introduction

Alveolar bone formation and maintenance is thought to rely on the presence of erupting and functioning teeth. The alveolus develops with tooth eruption, including the alveolar bone proper for periodontal ligament attachment, and the surrounding cancellous bone and cortical plates for overall tooth support. Jaws without erupting teeth never develop alveolar processes and consist only of basal bone.1, 2 Experimental and finite element studies of the loaded tooth and periodontium indicate that the periodontal ligament deforms during occlusal loading and subsequently transmits loads to adjacent bone.3, 4 The loading environment of alveolar bone, as well as the bone's response to load, however, remain uncharacterised. This study investigates the properties of alveolar bone and the consequences of removal of occlusal load.

Experimental studies have indicated that alveolar bone is likely to receive multiple sources of load. In addition to the occlusal stresses translated from the immediately adjacent tooth and periodontal ligament, loads arise from more remote origins, such as the occlusion of more distant teeth and the activity of masticatory muscles. In vivo measurement of strain in the mandibular body during chewing in pigs, rabbits and primates5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 shows a pattern that fits a model of mandibular torsion during mastication. In these previous studies, strain gages were placed on the basal bone of the mandible; thus strain in the alveolar region during mastication remains unmeasured.

This study was undertaken to understand the mechanical properties and functioning of alveolar bone and to test the hypothesis that the tissues supporting an occluding tooth would show greater stiffness and less strain than those of a non-occluding tooth. The rationale behind this hypothesis was that removal of antagonist teeth would remove the primary source of load from alveolar bone, and that when present, this load causes alveolar bone to adapt by fortification against occlusal stresses.

Section snippets

Animal procedures

All procedures were humane and approved by the University of Washington Animal Care and Use Committee. In six female Hanford miniature pigs, maxillary teeth opposing the mandibular first molar, M1, on one side were extracted so that M1 erupted unopposed. Prior to tooth extraction, lateral cephalograms were taken to establish the positions of the target teeth (unerupted upper first molar, M1, and erupted deciduous upper fourth premolar, dp4) within the maxilla. Tooth extraction surgeries were

Masticatory EMG and strain

Summaries of chewing side based on EMG data are presented in Table 2. Baseline chewing activity was not recorded for pigs 4565 and 4744 due to technical difficulties. The percentage of chews on each side prior to tooth extraction ranged from 42 to 55%; thus, percent chewing of approximately 40–60% on each side was defined as normal. At 1–2 weeks following tooth extraction surgeries, all of the pigs showed bias in their chewing movements toward the occluding, non-extraction side of the

Discussion

Maxillary tooth extractions clearly altered masticatory function during M1 tooth eruption and occlusal development, and removed one source of load from M1 alveolar bone. Immediately following the unilateral M1 and dp4 extractions, pigs favoured chewing on the non-extraction side. At this early stage of M1 eruption, the occluding side M1 had not yet reached occlusion, thus the preference for non-extraction side chewing likely was an avoidance of the contralateral wound site. With continued M1

Funding

Supported by NIH/NIDCR DE015815.

Competing interests

None declared.

Ethical approval

Not required.

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (11)

  • Functional tooth mobility in young pigs

    2020, Journal of Biomechanics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Deformation (or strain) of maxillary alveolar bone during mastication is unstudied, although there has been research, mainly in silico, to investigate imposed external forces (Cattaneo et al., 2009; Du et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2011). Previous studies on mandibular alveolar bone during mastication have yielded relatively high values of strain, averaging at least 500µε shear strain in both rabbits (Weijs and de Jongh, 1977) and pigs (Yeh et al., 2010). In contrast, the majority of our maxillary alveolar shear values were less than 200µε (Table 2).

  • Alveolar ridge reduction after tooth extraction in adolescents: An animal study

    2013, Archives of Oral Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The tooth extracted in this study (dm2) is relatively small (indicated by low strain values in Table 2 compared to those from a molar location21) and likely not so functionally critical as to require compensatory overactivity of the non-extraction side. Lack of compensation is supported by the fact that pigs did not favor the non-extraction side during chewing (Fig. 2A and B), as would be expected if the non-extraction site were overloaded.21 Moreover, it is reasonable to expect that the loss of occlusion should disturb force transmission to the buccal bone.

  • The impact of occlusal function on structural adaptation in alveolar bone of the growing pig, Sus Scrofa

    2011, Archives of Oral Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    After surgery, M1's were allowed to erupt on both sides while only the non-extraction side M1 was able to develop occlusal contact with opponent teeth. The effect of tooth extraction surgeries on the masticatory system has been described previously.12 Electromyography was used to track chewing activity before and after tooth extraction.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text