J. Maxwell Chamberlain memorial paper
Morbidity and Mortality of Major Pulmonary Resections in Patients With Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Initial Results of the Randomized, Prospective ACOSOG Z0030 Trial

Presented at the Forty-first Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Tampa, FL, Jan 24–26, 2005. Winner of the J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Award for General Thoracic Surgery.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.066Get rights and content

Background

Little prospective, multiinstitutional data exist regarding the morbidity and mortality after major pulmonary resections for lung cancer or whether a mediastinal lymph node dissection increases morbidity and mortality.

Methods

Prospectively collected 30-day postoperative data was analyzed from 1,111 patients undergoing pulmonary resection who were enrolled from July 1999 to February 2004 in a randomized trial comparing lymph node sampling versus mediastinal lymph node dissection for early stage lung cancer.

Results

Of the 1,111 patients randomized, 1,023 were included in the analysis. Median age was 68 years (range, 23 to 89 years); 52% were men. Lobectomy was performed in 766 (75%) and pneumonectomy in 42 (4%). Pathologic stage was IA in 424 (42%), IB in 418 (41%), IIA in 37 (4%), IIB in 97 (9%), and III in 45 (5%). Lymph node sampling was performed in 498 patients and lymph node dissection in 525. Operative mortality was 2.0% (10 of 498) for lymph node sampling and 0.76% (4 of 525) for lymph node dissection. Complications occurred in 38% of patients in each group. Lymph node dissection had a longer median operative time and greater total chest tube drainage (15 minutes, 121 mL, respectively). There was no difference in the median hospitalization, which was 6 days in each group (p = 0.404).

Conclusions

Complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy adds little morbidity to a pulmonary resection for lung cancer. These data from a current, multiinstitutional cohort of patients who underwent a major pulmonary resection constitute a new baseline with which to compare results in the future.

Section snippets

Material and Methods

From June 1999 to February 2004, 1,111 patients were randomized into the Z0030 trial. Eligibility requirements included patients older than 18 years of age, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score lower than 3, and a tissue diagnosis of a clinically resectable T1 or T2, N0 or nonhilar N1, M0 non–small-cell lung cancer (squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma, including bronchoalveolar carcinoma) established before randomization. Patients underwent

Results

There were 529 (52%) men and 494 (48%) women randomized to either LNS only (498 patients) or LND (525 patients; Table 1). The median age was 68 years with a range of 23 to 89 years. The race was white in 955 patients (93%), black in 46 (4%), and other in 22 (2%). An ECOG performance score of zero was recorded in 687 patients (67%), one in 308 (30%), and two in 28 (3%). Tumor location is shown in Figure 1; the most common tumor location was the right upper lobe (38%). Mediastinoscopy was

Comment

Performing a complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy at the time of pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer is controversial. Complete dissection is purported to be associated with a lower risk of local recurrence and better long-term survival because of improved staging. Passlick and associates [5] demonstrated that patients with immunohistochemically detected lymph node metastasis have increased long-term survival if a mediastinal LND is performed. The arguments against complete

References (11)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (580)

View all citing articles on Scopus

Members of the American College of Surgeons Oncology (ACOSOG) Z0030 study group and their affiliations are listed in the Appendix.

View full text