Research report
Factor analysis of Forced Swimming test, Sucrose Preference test and Open Field test on enriched, social and isolated reared rats

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2005.12.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Developmental and social factors are known to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of affective disorders. Although it has been demonstrated that early life aversive experiences can be a risk factor in the development of human depression, most of the investigation in animals that try to model depression do not include postnatal manipulations. Since housing represents a fundamental ethological factor which modifies behavior and brain development, this study aimed to investigate the impact of different social and structural housing conditions on the development of a depressive-like syndrome in the behavioral despair paradigm and an anxiety-like syndrome in the unconditioned anxiety paradigm. The present study uses several multivariate analyses to study the impact of housing conditions in animal models of depression and anxiety. In this study, social isolation was able to reproduce the effects found in other animals models based on stress, suggesting that only 2 months of social isolation are enough to produce effects that can be useful as behavioral model of depression. Moreover, environmental enrichment showed an antidepressive and anxiolytic like effect in animal models of depression and anxiety. This effect, which has not been reported in earlier studies, suggests that stimulation during the first stages of growth might play a “protective” role on behavior and brain development.

Introduction

The environments in which human infants and children grow are fundamental to determine their progress. Several aversive situations like parental loss, emotional and physical neglect, and abuse have been shown to be associated with the risk of suffering psychological disorders across the life span [47]. Although it has been demonstrated that early life aversive experiences can be a risk factor in the development of human depression [30], [41], most of the investigations in animals that try to model depression do not include postnatal manipulations. However, specific manipulations of the postnatal social environment in rats can result in chronic developmental changes, such that, when studied in terms of behavior and physiology under basal and laboratory test conditions [47], [49], they provide important models of specific symptoms and associated abnormalities in depression or anxiety [48], [49], [53]. The association between environment factors and the appearance of abnormal behaviors has motivated the design of devices and techniques for enrichment or impoverishment of the animals’ environments.

Environmental enrichment, that can be achieved using objects and several cage designs to improve the quality of life of the laboratory animal [18], have shown that animals that are reared in these conditions, display lower basal activity in an inescapable novel environment relative to animals housed in an impoverished condition [3]. On the other hand, social isolation may have long-term consequences for the animal. It has been demonstrated that when comparing socially isolated rats (SI) with environmentally enriched rats (EE), SI animals generally show higher states of fearfulness, and become more responsive and vulnerable to environmental changes [14], [15], [21], [22], [23]. Thus, social isolation may be considered as a long-term stressor and environmental impoverishment [29], [49], [54], [60]. With regard to the latter, in our recent study (unpublished data) we show that chronic exposure of rats to an enriched environment improves behavior using depression and anxiety models. Moreover, this condition increased brain weight and the cortical size compared with the social isolated group. The aim purpose of this study is to estimate the construct and predictive validity of housing condition effects on depression and anxiety models, using following multivariate statistical analyses:

  • (i)

    Factor analysis (principal components) to identify factors that could explain the possible patterns of correlation between the superficial variables (variables directly measured). It was expected that the behaviors measured would be clustered according to the behavioral test to which they belong (Forced Swimming test, Open Field test and Sucrose Preference test), to confirm that the behavioral variables were related to the theoretical construct underlying each test.

  • (ii)

    Multivariate variance analysis (MANOVA) to compare the factorial loads between groups (enrichment, standard control and Social Isolation), with the main purpose to determine if housing conditions are able to produce significant differences in the factors extracted

  • (iii)

    Linear regression analysis to estimate how the extracted factors were predicted and explained by the housing conditions. Additionally, this analysis was used to estimate the weight on the factor loads that each behavior has.

Finally, and taking into account all the analyses, validity of the housing conditions will be discussed, and the extent to which postnatal environmental manipulations induce long-term behavioral states that may be analogous to symptoms and associated abnormalities of depression and anxiety.

Section snippets

Animals

Forty-five male Sprague–Dawley rats, 22–24-day-old (LEBi Laboratories, University of Costa Rica, San José) were housed under standard conditions and maintained a 12:12 h light–dark schedule (light on at 07:00–19:00 h.), room temperature at 20.5 ± 1.20 °C, 78–87% of relative humidity, 10 air cycles per hour and free access to water and food (Aguilar y Solís rats chow). The mean weight of the animals 3 days after weaning was 64.08 g ± 3.07 g (mean ± S.E.M.). They were acclimatized in the maintenance room 1

Factor analysis

The variables included in the correlation matrix had appropriate values for a factorial analysis (KMO = 0.70; χ2 = 209.35, P < 0.0001). The factor analysis displayed two principal components or factors (which together explained 68% of total variability, see Table 2). The first factor contains all the behaviors measured in the FST, plus sucrose consumption and duration of grooming and was named “behavioral despair” (see Table 3 and discussion for details). This factor explained the 50% of total

Discussion

The first factor clustered all behaviors measured during the FST. Traditionally, FST variables have been defined as behavioral despair [10], [37], [45], and therefore, in this study the first factor was thus named. In the present study, the immobility was the most important positively related variable within the first factor (Table 3). This behavior has been interpreted in the literature as an index of behavioral despair (depression) because antidepressant drugs are able to reduce the time

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Lic. Alfonso Villalobos, Lic. Sara González, Dr. Rainer Schwarting and Dr. Sandra File for the helpful comments and language revision. This work was supported by Vicerrectoría de Investigación Universidad de Costa Rica : Project N° 605-A3-953.

References (62)

  • J. Jolles et al.

    Novelty and grooming behaviour in the rat

    Behav Neural Biol

    (1979)
  • R.J. Katz et al.

    Acute and chronic stress effects on open field activity in the rat: implications for model of depression

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (1981)
  • R.J. Katz

    Animal model and human depressive disorders

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (1981)
  • C. Lino de-Oliveira et al.

    Structure of the rat behaviour in the forced swimming test

    Behav Brain Res

    (2005)
  • I. Lucki et al.

    Antidepressant-like behavioural effects of serotonin receptors agonists

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (1994)
  • M.J. Millan et al.

    Anxiolytic properties of the selective, non-peptidergic CRF1 antagonists, CP154, 526 and DMP695: a comparison to other classes of anxiolytic agent

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2001)
  • S. Pothion et al.

    Strain differences in sucrose preference and in the consequences of unpredictable chronic mild stress

    Behav Brain Res

    (2004)
  • C.R. Pryce et al.

    Long-term effects of early-life environmental manipulations in rodents and primates: Potential animal models in depression research

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (2005)
  • C.R. Pryce et al.

    Long-term neurobehavioural impact of the postnatal environment in rats: manipulations, effects and mediating mechanisms

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (2003)
  • E. Richelson

    Pharmacology of antidepressants—characteristics of ideal drug

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (1994)
  • D. Rüedi-Bettschen et al.

    Early deprivation under specific conditions leads to reduced interest in reward in adulthood in Wistar rats

    Behav Brain Res

    (2005)
  • F. Sherif et al.

    Effect of the GABA-transaminase inhibitor vigabatrin on exploratory behaviour in socially isolated rats

    Behav Brain Res

    (1995)
  • C.M. Thiel et al.

    Hipocampal acetylcholine and habituation learning

    Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • P. Willner et al.

    Chronic mild stress-induced anhedonia: a realistic animal model of depression

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (1992)
  • R. Andreatini et al.

    The relationship between anxiety and depression in animal models: study using the forced swimming test and elevated plus-maze

    Braz J Med Biol Res

    (1999)
  • J.C. Ballenger

    Clinical guideline for establishing remission in patients with depression and anxiety

    J Clin Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • N. Benaroya-Milshtein et al.

    Environmental enrichment in mice decreases anxiety, attenuates stress responses and enhances natural killer cell activity

    Eur J Neurosci

    (2004)
  • D.C. Blanchard et al.

    Pharmacological and neural control an anti-predator defense in the rat

    Aggressive Behav

    (1990)
  • D.C. Blanchard et al.

    Risk assessment and animal models of anxiety

  • R.J. Bolles

    Grooming behaviour in the rat

    J Comp Physiol Psychol

    (1960)
  • M. Bourin et al.

    How valuable are animal models in defining antidepressant activity?

    Hum Psychopharm Clin

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Tel.: +506 207 49 03; fax: +506 207 58 27.

    View full text