Poly(U) and polyadenylation termination signals are interchangeable for terminating the expression of shRNA from a pol II promoter

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.128Get rights and content

Abstract

Most short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-expressing vectors use RNA polymerase III promoters, as expression of shRNAs from RNA polymerase II promoters is not well understood, due to the lack of defined transcription initiation sites and functional localization of the transcription termination signal. Here we describe a modified cytomegavirus (CMV) promoter, an RNA polymerase II promoter, to express shRNAs with only four overhangs at the 5′ end. The expression of shRNAs from the modified CMV promoter was terminated by the transcription termination, the polyadenylation, or the poly(U) termination signal. These results demonstrated that the poly(U) and polyadenylation termination signals are interchangeable for terminating the expression of shRNAs from the CMV promoter and result in similar efficacies in inhibiting endogenous target genes in mammalian cells.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Plasmids. A construct containing the cytomegavirus (CMV) promoter, either the polyadenylation signal (AATAAA) or the poly(U) termination signal (TTTTT), and the shRNA gene cloning sites, SacII and HindIII, was PCR-amplified with forward and reverse primers, using the pEGFP-N1 vector containing the CMV promoter as a template. For cloning purposes, the forward sequence, 5′-ACGTCTAGATAGTTATTAATAGTAATCAA-3′, was flanked with XbaI at the 5′ end (underlined), and the reverse sequence, 5′-GGCGAATTC

RNAi-mediated gene silencing by the CMV promoter is compatible with that of the U6 promoter

We constructed a CMV pol II promoter to express shRNAs that silenced the endogenous target gene (Fig. 1A). The transcription initiation site was merged into the cloning site (SacII) of the vector, which starts from the first G of the cloning site. This arrangement not only simplified the process of subcloning, but also reduced the overhangs at the 5′ end to four nucleotides, thereby increasing the effects of RNAi. To terminate the transcription of shRNAs from the CMV promoter, the

Discussion

RNA polymerase II promoters were used to drive the expression of long hairpin RNA cleaved by Dicer into siRNAs that silence target gene expression [8], [9], [10]. However, expression of long hairpin RNA in mammalian cells induces the interferon response, thereby limiting their usefulness. Long hairpin RNA has also been used in organisms with weak or absent interferon responses. These long hairpin expression systems have effectively silenced target genes in several different organisms, including

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Kristen Lum for a critical review of the manuscript and Susan Chou for assistance with experiments. This work was supported by Public Health Services Grant CA66746 to R.C. from the National Cancer Institute.

References (35)

  • R.A. Jorgensen et al.

    An RNA-based information superhighway in plants

    Science

    (1998)
  • S.M. Elbashir et al.

    Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells

    Nature

    (2001)
  • N.J. Caplen et al.

    Specific inhibition of gene expression by small double-stranded RNAs in invertebrate and vertebrate systems

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

    (2001)
  • T.R. Brummelkamp et al.

    A system for stable expression of short interfering RNAs in mammalian cells

    Science

    (2002)
  • M.T. McManus et al.

    Gene silencing using micro-RNA designed hairpins

    RNA

    (2002)
  • P.J. Paddison et al.

    Short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) induce sequence-specific silencing in mammalian cells

    Genes Dev.

    (2002)
  • N. Tavernarakis et al.

    Heritable and inducible genetic interference by double-stranded RNA encoded by transgenes

    Nat. Genet.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Broadening prime editing toolkits using RNA-Pol-II-driven engineered pegRNA

      2022, Molecular Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, there are some concerns on RNA-Pol-III-based sgRNA expression in the ePE3 system. First, RNA Pol III transcription can be easily terminated by four to six contiguous U residues, making it less ideal for expressing complex RNA structures containing more than four contiguous U residues.10 Second, RNA Pol III promoter adds an extra guanine or adenine to the 5ʹ end of sgRNA, resulting in the sgRNA-DNA mismatch at the 5ʹ end, influencing the efficiency of high-fidelity SpCas9 variants.11

    • RNA interference for improving the outcome of islet transplantation

      2011, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Usually, a poly (A) signal is needed for the termination of CMV promoter expression. A modified CMV promoter can also be terminated by poly(T) termination signal [129]. To increase the activity of U6 or H1 promoter, hybrid promoters composed of CMV enhancer and U6 or H1 promoter were constructed for shRNA expression [133–135].

    • Tissue-selective RNA interference in prostate cancer cell using prostate specific membrane antigen promoter/enhancer

      2009, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
      Citation Excerpt :

      To determine whether the PSMA promoter/enhancer can be used to produce shRNA and silence gene expression in a prostate cancer-specific fashion, we constructed a vector in which shRNA in the form of a small hairpin structure was placed under the control of the 2892 bps PSMA promoter/enhancer, followed by a minimal polyA (mpA) sequence. A similar mpA has been used successfully for CMV-driven shRNA [21]. In the present study, we demonstrated that PSMA promoter/enhancer-driven shRNA could depress the expression of the exogenous reporter genes EGFP in different prostate cancer cells (LNCaP, PC-3) but not in normal cells (WI-38) and other cancer cells (HepG2).

    • Lentiviral vector design for multiple shRNA expression and durable HIV-1 inhibition

      2008, Molecular Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Differences in inhibitory activity should therefore reflect different expression levels. Activities of these promoters have been compared before, but only with a subset of two promoters.32,33,40,41 We now tested and compared four promoters and measured similar shRNA inhibitory activity for each of these promoters.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text