MicroRNAs preferentially target the genes with high transcriptional regulation complexity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.11.080Get rights and content

Abstract

Over the past few years, microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as a new prominent class of gene regulatory factors that negatively regulate expression of approximately one-third of the genes in animal genomes at post-transcriptional level. However, it is still unclear why some genes are regulated by miRNAs but others are not, i.e. what principles govern miRNA regulation in animal genomes. In this study, we systematically analyzed the relationship between transcription factors (TFs) and miRNAs in gene regulation. We found that the genes with more TF-binding sites have a higher probability of being targeted by miRNAs and have more miRNA-binding sites on average. This observation reveals that the genes with higher cis-regulation complexity are more coordinately regulated by TFs at the transcriptional level and by miRNAs at the post-transcriptional level. This is a potentially novel discovery of mechanism for coordinated regulation of gene expression. Gene ontology analysis further demonstrated that such coordinated regulation is more popular in the developmental genes.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Datasets used in this study. A dataset representing three transcription factors, OCT4, NANOG, and SOX2 and their target genes in human embryonic stem cells was obtained from Boyer et al. [9]. The regulatory relationships of the three transcription factors and their target genes are listed in Supplementary Text File S1.

The genome-wide computationally predicted human miRNA target genes were obtained from Krek et al. [10]. There were a total of 6243 genes regulated by 168 miRNAs. The miRNAs and

Results and discussion

To study how miRNAs and TFs coordinately regulate genes in the human genome, we first took a dataset which represents the regulatory relations between the three TFs, OCT4, NANOG, and SOX2, and their target genes in human embryonic stem cells [9]. The regulatory relationships between the three TFs (OCT4, NANOG, and SOX2) and their target genes were determined through ChIP-chip analysis (chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with DNA microarray) [9]. The three TFs regulate a total of 2046 genes.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Genomics and Health Initiative, National Research Council Canada. We thank Doreen Harcus for reading the manuscript and correcting grammar mistakes.

References (39)

  • M.A. Carmell et al.

    RNase III enzymes and the initiation of gene silencing

    Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.

    (2004)
  • G. Meister et al.

    Mechanisms of gene silencing by double-stranded RNA

    Nature

    (2004)
  • S. Griffiths-Jones et al.

    Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2005)
  • A. Krek et al.

    Combinatorial microRNA target predictions

    Nat. Genet.

    (2005)
  • D. Cora et al.

    Ab initio identification of putative human transcription factor binding sites by comparative genomics

    BMC Bioinformatics.

    (2005)
  • X. Xie et al.

    Systematic discovery of regulatory motifs in human promoters and 3′ UTRs by comparison of several mammals

    Nature

    (2005)
  • T. Beißbarth et al.

    GOstat: find statistically overrepesented gene ontologies within a group of genes

    Bioinformatics

    (2004)
  • A.J. Enright et al.

    MicroRNA targets in Drosophila

    Genome Biol.

    (2003)
  • B. John et al.

    Human MicroRNA targets

    PLoS Biol.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (114)

    • Aging in Rodents

      2019, Encyclopedia of Biomedical Gerontology: Volume 1-3
    • Aging in rodents

      2019, Encyclopedia of Biomedical Gerontology
    • A novel framework for inferring condition-specific TF and miRNA co-regulation of protein-protein interactions

      2016, Gene
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given the important roles of TFs and miRNAs, it is of great interest to have the unified gene regulatory networks involving both TFs and miRNAs for understanding biological processes. Some studies (Shalgi et al., 2007; Cui et al., 2007a; Le Béchec et al., 2011; Roqueiro et al., 2012; Le et al., 2013; Guo et al., 2014; Hamed et al., 2015) have investigated TF and miRNA co-regulatory networks, but they have not considered the downstream protein–protein interactions (PPIs), which are indeed critical to most biological processes. PPIs are at the core of the entire interactomics system of all living cells, and PPI networks can provide insight into the causes of diseases (Sanz-Pamplona et al., 2012).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text