Elsevier

Behavioural Processes

Volume 68, Issue 3, 31 March 2005, Pages 185-199
Behavioural Processes

Review
Parasitic manipulation: where are we and where should we go?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2004.06.010Get rights and content

Section snippets

Adaptive versus non-adaptive changes: is the debate clear?

It is now accepted that phenotypic changes in infected hosts are not necessarily ‘true’ parasitic (or host) adaptations, they may be ‘by-products’ of infection or ancestral legacies. Although we agree with the evolutionary relevance of these distinctions, we believe that a discussion is needed, at least to recall the limitations of the definitions and of the methods originally chosen to decide whether a change is adaptive or not.

Adaptation is a complex concept with several possible definitions

How does the presence of a parasite alter host behaviour ?

Parasites can use both direct and indirect mechanisms to alter host behaviour. Parasites can alter host behaviour directly by interacting with the host's nervous system or muscle. For example, a parasite may secrete/excrete a neuroactive substance resulting in changes in host behaviour. Parasites can have indirect effects on host behaviour by affecting host tissues other than neurons and muscles, resulting in host-mediated changes in behaviour. For example, the presence of a parasite can

Mafia-like strategy of manipulation: an understudied hypothesis?

The complexity of the interactions between host and parasite suggest that we may not yet know all the ways in which parasites and hosts interact. For example, it has been recently suggested that parasites may select for collaborative behaviour in their host by imposing extra fitness costs in the absence of compliance. This interaction has been called a mafia-like strategy. This process was initially proposed as a possible explanation for why several bird species accept cuckoo eggs and nestlings

Considering manipulated hosts within ecosystems

Many studies of parasitic manipulation have been performed without considering the ecological context in which they occur. This is unfortunate, for it compromises both our understanding of the evolution of parasitic manipulation and our understanding of the ecological consequences of manipulation within ecosystems.

A full understanding of the evolution of parasitic manipulation requires knowledge of the selective pressures experienced by both the host and the parasite. Conditions used in

How complex are ‘parasitically modified organisms’?

A full understanding of the manipulation processes requires the study of other phenotypic traits in hosts in addition to the most obviously altered behaviours. Indeed, there are several reasons to think that we have until now only studied the visible part of the iceberg, manipulated hosts being probably more complex than traditionally viewed.

Studies on phenotypic plasticity and evolution have shown how a single phenotypic change (for instance induced by a minor genetic mutation) can result

Multiple parasites within manipulated hosts

Recently there has been a growing interest in studying the influence of manipulative parasitic species on the evolution of sympatric parasite species. Lafferty et al. (2000) have proposed a series of predictions about transmission strategies that should be favored by natural selection depending on the ecology of the co-occurring parasite species in the manipulated host. For instance, when manipulation is costly to achieve and when non-manipulative and manipulative parasites have shared

Determining the causes of intraspecific variation in manipulative processes

It is common to find substantial variation in the intensity of the phenotypic changes displayed by infected hosts, even when they are collected in the same environment and at the same time. As pointed out by Perrot-Minnot (2004), the analysis of the intraspecific variability in these patterns is nonetheless essential to an understanding of their evolution. When a character is variable for both genetic and environmental reasons, two individuals may differ because they differ in genotype, because

Concluding remarks

In the year 2000, Poulin published a paper entitled “Manipulation of host behaviour by parasites: a weakening paradigm?” (Poulin, 2000). Although some of Poulin's concerns are well justified, we find that on the whole, the study of manipulation is far from being weak. If anything, it is moving into a new era, characterized by challenging questions that demand interdisciplinary approaches. These little worms, tiny protozoa and viruses are on the brink of accomplishing what has eluded large

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (118)

  • S.L. Klein

    Parasite manipulation of the proximate mechanisms that mediate social behaviour in vertebrates

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2003)
  • K.D. Lafferty

    The evolution of trophic transmission

    Parasitol. Today

    (1999)
  • G. Lauckner

    Ecological effects of larval trematode infestations on littoral invertebrate populations

    Int. J. Parasitol.

    (1987)
  • K.N. Mouritsen et al.

    Parasite-induced trophic facilitation exploited by a non-host predator: a manipulator's nightmare

    Int. J. Parasitol.

    (2003)
  • Y. Outreman et al.

    Patterns of intermediate host use and levels of association between two conflicting manipulative parasites

    Int. J. Parasitol.

    (2002)
  • M.J. Perrot-Minnot

    Larval morphology, genetic divergence, and contrasting levels of host manipulation between forms of Pomphorhynchus laevis (Acanthocephala)

    Int. J. Parasitol.

    (2004)
  • R. Poulin

    “Adaptive” change in the behaviour of parasitized animals: a critical review

    Int. J. Parasitol.

    (1995)
  • R. Poulin et al.

    Host sharing and host manipulation by larval helminths in shore crabs: cooperation or conflict?

    Int. J. Parasitol.

    (2003)
  • R. Poulin et al.

    Phenotypic variability induced by parasites: extent and evolutionary implications

    Parasitol. Today

    (1999)
  • R. Poulin et al.

    Interspecific associations among larval helminthes in fish

    Int. J. Parasitol.

    (2001)
  • M.C. Rigby et al.

    Why should parasite resistance be costly?

    Trends Parasitol.

    (2002)
  • C. Rupprecht et al.

    Rabies re-examined

    Lancet Infect. Dis.

    (2002)
  • F. Thomas et al.

    Understanding parasite strategies: a state-dependent approach?

    Trends Parasitol.

    (2002)
  • S.A. Adamo

    Modulating the modulators: parasites, neuromodulators and host behavioural change

    Brain Behav. Evol.

    (2002)
  • S.A. Adamo

    How parasites alter the behaviour of their insect hosts

  • S.A. Adamo

    The specificity of behavioural fever in the cricket Acheta domesticus

    J. Parasitol.

    (1998)
  • P. Agnew et al.

    Age and size at maturity of the mosquito Culex pipiens infected by the microsporidian parasite Vavraia culicis

    Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B

    (1999)
  • R.M. Anderson et al.

    Infectious Diseases of Humans

    (1992)
  • C.J. Barnard et al.

    Parasitism and Host Behaviour

    (1990)
  • K. Bechter

    Mild encephalitis underlying psychiatric disorder—a reconsideration and hypothesis exemplified on Borna disease

    Neurol. Psychiatry Brain Res.

    (2001)
  • M. Berdoy et al.

    Fatal attraction in rats infected with Toxoplasma gondii

    Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B

    (2000)
  • W.M. Bethel et al.

    Altered evasive behaviour and responses to light in amphipods harboring acanthocephalan cystacanths

    J. Parasitol.

    (1973)
  • W.M. Bethel et al.

    Increased vulnerability of amphipods to predation owing to altered behaviour induced by larval acanthocephalans

    Can. J. Zool.

    (1977)
  • Biron, D.G., Moura, H., Marché, L., Hughes, A.L., Thomas, F., 2005. Towards a new conceptual approach to...
  • J. Brodeur et al.

    Seasonal microhabitat selection by an endoparasitoid through adaptive modification of host behaviour

    Science

    (1989)
  • F. Cézilly et al.

    Conflict between co-occuring manipulative parasites? An experimental study of the joint influence of two acanthocephalan parasites on the behaviour of Gammarus pulex

    Parasitology

    (2000)
  • C. Combes

    Ethological aspect of parasite transmission

    Am. Nat.

    (1991)
  • C. Combes

    Parasitism, The Ecology and Evolution of Intimate Interactions

    (1998)
  • Cram, E.R., 1931. Developmental stages of some nematodes of the Spiruroidea parasitic in poultry and game birds. USDA...
  • L.A. Curtis

    Parasitism and the movements of intertidal gastropod individuals

    Biol. Bull.

    (1990)
  • L.A. Curtis

    Vertical distribution of an estuarine snail altered by a parasite

    Science

    (1987)
  • R. Dantzer

    Sickness behaviour: a neuroimmune-based response to infectious disease

  • R. Dawkins

    The Extended Phenotype

    (1982)
  • M. de Jong-Brink

    How schistosomes profit from the stress responses of their host

    Adv. Parasitol.

    (1995)
  • M. de Jong-Brink et al.

    Multiple strategies of schistosomes to meet their requirements in the intermediate smail host

    Parasitology

    (2001)
  • M. de Jong-Brink et al.

    Schistosome parasites induce physiological changes in their snail host by interfering with two regulatory systems, the internal defense system and the neuroendocrine system

  • M. de Jong-Brink et al.

    Parasites flicking the NPY gene on the host's switchboard: why NPY?

    FASEB

    (1972-1984)
  • B.S. Dezfuli et al.

    Costs of intraspecific and interspecific host sharing in acanthocephalan cystacanths

    Parasitology

    (2001)
  • O. Duvaux-Miret et al.

    Immunosuppression in the definitive and intermediate hosts of the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni by release of immunoactive neuropeptides

    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1992)
  • W.G. Eberhard

    Spider manipulation by a wasp larva

    Nature

    (2000)
  • Cited by (472)

    • Clockwork intruders: Do parasites manipulate their hostsʼ circadian rhythms?

      2024, Current Research in Parasitology and Vector-Borne Diseases
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text