Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 68, Issue 4, 15 August 2010, Pages 345-351
Biological Psychiatry

Archival Report
No Neural Evidence of Statistical Learning During Exposure to Artificial Languages in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.01.011Get rights and content

Background

Language delay is a hallmark feature of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The identification of word boundaries in continuous speech is a critical first step in language acquisition that can be accomplished via statistical learning and reliance on speech cues. Importantly, early word segmentation skills have been shown to predict later language development in typically developing (TD) children.

Methods

Here we investigated the neural correlates of online word segmentation in children with and without ASD with a well-established behavioral paradigm previously validated for functional magnetic resonance imaging. Eighteen high-functioning boys with ASD and 18 age- and IQ-matched TD boys underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while listening to two artificial languages (containing statistical or statistical + prosodic cues to word boundaries) and a random speech stream.

Results

Consistent with prior findings, in TD control subjects, activity in fronto-temporal-parietal networks decreased as the number of cues to word boundaries increased. The ASD children, however, did not show this facilitatory effect. Furthermore, statistical contrasts modeling changes in activity over time identified significant learning-related signal increases for both artificial languages in basal ganglia and left temporo-parietal cortex only in TD children. Finally, the level of communicative impairment in ASD children was inversely correlated with signal increases in these same regions during exposure to the artificial languages.

Conclusions

This is the first study to demonstrate significant abnormalities in the neural architecture subserving language-related learning in ASD children and to link the communicative impairments observed in this population to decreased sensitivity to the statistical and speech cues available in the language input.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were recruited through flyers posted around the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) campus and the greater Los Angeles area as well as through referrals from the UCLA Autism Evaluation Clinic. Twenty-four high-functioning boys with ASD (12.62 ± 2.50 years) with normal full-scale IQ (FSIQ; 102.17 + 19.82) as assessed by the Wechsler Abbreviated Scales of Intelligence—Revised (WASI-R) (34) or Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—3rd edition (WISC-III) (35) and 24 age-

Behavioral Results

Response times and accuracy on the postscan behavioral test are reported in Table S1 in Supplement 1. Children were not expected, on the basis of evidence from prior behavioral studies, to be able to explicitly identify whether these trisyllabic combinations were words in the artificial languages after such a short exposure to the streams (26, 42). Participants were unable to explicitly recognize trisyllabic word combinations from the artificial languages they heard during the exposure task,

Discussion

We found evidence of disrupted language network activity in children with ASD, consistent with previous investigations of language processing in autism (17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24). Previous fMRI findings of word segmentation in healthy adults (32) revealed a consistent pattern of decreasing cortical activity within fronto-temporal-parietal networks as the number of cues to word boundaries increased from the R (minimal statistical cues) to the U (strong statistical cues) and S (strong statistical

References (49)

  • J.R. Gelfand et al.

    Dissociating neural mechanisms of temporal sequencing and processing phonemes

    Neuron

    (2003)
  • D.R. Gitelman et al.

    Language network specializations: An analysis with parallel task designs and functional magnetic resonance imaging

    NeuroImage

    (2005)
  • R.L. Gomez et al.

    Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition

    Trends Cogn Sci

    (2000)
  • M. Alarcón et al.

    Linkage, Association and gene-expression analyses identify CNTNAP2 as an autism-susceptibility gene

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2008)
  • M. Alarcon et al.

    Evidence for a language quantitative trait locus on chromosome 7q in multiplex autism families

    Mol Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • A. Bailey et al.

    Autism: Towards an integration of clinical, genetic, neuropsychological, and neurobiological perspectives

    J Child Psychol Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • H. Tager-Flusberg et al.

    A longitudinal study of language acquisition in autistic and Down syndrome children

    J Autism Dev Disord

    (1990)
  • A. Venter et al.

    A follow-up study of high-functioning autistic children

    J Child Psychol Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • G. Bartolucci et al.

    Deictic categories in the language of autistic children

    J Autism Child Schizophr

    (1974)
  • G. Bartolucci et al.

    Cross-sectional studies of grammatical morphemes in autistic and mentally retarded children

    J Autism Dev Disord

    (1980)
  • M.M. Kjelgaard et al.

    An investigation of language impairment in autism: Implications for genetic Subgroups

    Lang Cogn Process

    (2001)
  • P. Howlin

    Outcome in high-functioning adults with autism with and without early language delays: Implications for the differentiation between autism and Asperger syndrome

    J Autism Dev Disord

    (2003)
  • I. Martin et al.

    An exploration of causes of non-literal language problems in individuals with Asperger Syndrome

    J Autism Dev Disord

    (2004)
  • M.D. Rutherford et al.

    Reading the mind in the voice: A study with normal adults and adults with Asperger syndrome and high functioning autism

    J Autism Dev Disord

    (2002)
  • Cited by (72)

    • Increased intra-subject variability of neural activity during speech production in people with autism spectrum disorder

      2022, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, in minimally verbal and language-impaired individuals with ASD, atypical auditory behaviors were related to the level of neural sensitivity to differences in non-speech sounds (Schwartz, Wang, Shinn-Cunningham, & Tager-Flusberg, 2020a), and auditory deficits were found in difficult listening situations, such as noisy environments (Schwartz, Wang, Shinn-Cunningham, & Tager-Flusberg, 2020b). Language and communication abilities in individuals with ASD are also related to areas of language impacted by auditory perception (e.g., implicit language learning, word segmentation abilities, consonant differentiation, verbal imitation), further suggesting a linkage between auditory perception and language abilities (Arnett et al., 2018; Key, Yoder, & Stone, 2016; Scott-Van Zeeland et al., 2010; Smith, Mirenda, & Zaidman-Zait, 2007). These previous studies indicate that differences in auditory perception abilities (potentially caused by increased neural noise) may be related to verbal abilities in individuals with ASD.

    • Sleep spindle activity correlates with implicit statistical learning consolidation in untreated obstructive sleep apnea patients

      2021, Sleep Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Future larger studies that assess the strength of coupling between fast and slow spindles and slow oscillations [32], determine subject-specific frequencies for slow and fast spindle activity [33], and assess different memory domains in OSA may help elucidate these findings further. Neuroimaging studies have also shown that the basal ganglia, in particular the striatum, is involved in statistical learning and more generalised implicit learning [34-36]. Sleep spindles are generated in the thalamo-reticular nucleus in the thalamus [37].

    • Language learning in the adult brain: A neuroanatomical meta-analysis of lexical and grammatical learning

      2019, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since learning in this paradigm may involve both the acquisition of lexical-like information (i.e., extracting specific phonological sequences from a speech stream) and the statistical learning of regularities in language (Karuza et al., 2013; Ullman, 2016), such studies could therefore not be clearly categorized as lexical or grammatical learning. The 205 excluded papers included, among others: review papers that did not include original (empirical) research (criterion 1 above; e.g., Friederici, 2004); papers that did not use appropriate methodology, analyses, or reporting to be included in an ALE analysis (criteria 2–5; e.g., Ghazi Saidi et al., 2013); papers that examined only subject groups with children under 12 or individuals with disorders (criterion 6; e.g., Friedrich and Friederici, 2011); papers that examined sign language (criterion 7; e.g., McCullough et al., 2005); and papers that did not examine the functional neuroanatomy of lexical or grammatical learning (criterion 8; e.g., de Zubicaray et al., 2014; Scott-Van Zeeland et al., 2010; Stewart et al., 2003). Note that many excluded papers, including some listed above, failed multiple inclusion criteria (e.g., Friedrich and Friederici, 2011, tested word learning in infants using ERPs, and thus did not meet criteria 2–6).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text