Elsevier

Bioresource Technology

Volume 102, Issue 16, August 2011, Pages 7521-7525
Bioresource Technology

Techno-economic implications of improved high gravity corn mash fermentation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.094Get rights and content

Abstract

The performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MBG3964, a strain able to tolerate >18% v/v ethanol, was compared to leading industrial ethanol strain, Fermentis Ethanol Red, under high gravity corn mash fermentation conditions. Compared to the industrial ethanol strain, MBG3964 gave increased alcohol yield (140 g L−1 vs. 126 g L−1), lower residual sugar (4 g L−1 vs. 32 g L−1), and lower glycerol (11 g L−1 vs. 12 g L−1). After 72 h fermentation, MBG3964 showed about 40% viability, whereas the control yeast was only about 3% viable. Based on modelling, the higher ethanol tolerant yeast could increase the profitability of a corn–ethanol plant and help it remain viable through higher production, lower unit heating requirements and extra throughput. A typical 50 M gal y−1 dry mill ethanol plant that sells dried distiller’s grain could potentially increase its profit by nearly $US3.4 M y−1 due solely to the extra yield, and potentially another $US4.1 M y−1 if extra throughput is possible.

Highlights

► This paper compares an improved ethanol tolerant yeast to a leading industrial ethanol strain in corn mash fermentations. ► The improved yeast had a higher ethanol yield, lower residual sugar, lower glycerol and a higher measured cell viability. ► By using an improved yeast strain, a 50 M gal y−1 dry mill ethanol plant would increase its profitability by $US3.4 to 7.5 M y−1.

Introduction

Recent reviews have highlighted continued improvements in efficiency of ethanol production from corn (Johnson, 2006, Wu, 2008, Hettinga et al., 2009). These improvements include an increase in corn yields from 2 t ha−1 in 1950 to 10 t ha−1 in 2004, a 60% reduction in production cost between 1975 and 2005 and a 45% reduction in corn processing costs (excluding corn and fossil fuels) from 1983 to 2005 (Hettinga et al., 2009). The total cost including capital and corn feedstock declined 60% from the 1980s to 2005 (Hettinga et al., 2009). Improvements in corn to ethanol technology continue to be made with dry mill ethanol yields increasing from 2.64 to 2.81 denatured gallons of ethanol per bushel between 2001 and 2007, average water use decreasing from 4.7 to 3.5 L of water per litre of ethanol, and energy use for production decreasing by 22% (Wu, 2008). These gains have resulted from a number of improvements in plant design and operation as well as the widespread adoption of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. A significant number of these changes were made to ethanol plants in the late 1980s and early 1990s as the industry shifted away from traditional beverage alcohol technology (Hettinga et al., 2009).

A number of plant design changes have reduced both the capital and operating costs of corn to ethanol plants. The introduction of dry milling increased the yield from 0.37 to 0.40 m3 t−1 and no new wet mills have been built since 1990 (Hettinga et al., 2009). During the late 1980s and early 1990s molecular sieves replaced azeotropic distillation and heat integration became more widespread, both innovations leading to reductions in steam requirements (Hettinga et al., 2009). More recent reductions in energy consumption have resulted from selling wet instead of dried distiller’s grain. In 2008, 37% of mills sold distiller’s grain in wet form (Wu, 2008). One of the most significant changes in ethanol production from corn was the uptake of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (Casey and Ingledew, 1986) resulting in increased ethanol titres from 80 to 125 g L−1. Increased ethanol titres achieved using simultaneous saccharification and fermentation procedures is not necessarily due to an increase in ethanol tolerance of the yeast per se, but rather a decrease in the osmotic stress that the yeast is placed under during fermentation (Kotrba, 2006). The introduction of new more ethanol-tolerant yeast strains has further increased the alcohol concentration achieved, typically in excess of 125 g L−1 (Kotrba, 2006). At the same time there has been improvement in the activities of the amylase enzymes and a drop in their price with a 70% price reduction between 1990 and 2005 (Hettinga et al., 2009). In this paper we report on the performance of a recently developed yeast strain with improved ethanol tolerance and model the potential effects of introducing the new yeast strain into modern dry mill ethanol plants.

Section snippets

Preparation of active dried yeast (ADY)

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain MBG3964 was generated in the Microbiogen laboratories using breeding methods described by Attfield and Bell (2003). No genetic engineering methods were used in the generation of this strain. Stock streak plate cultures were grown for 24 h at 30 °C on 20 g L−1 d-glucose, 10 g L−1 bacteriological peptone, 5 g L−1 yeast extract and 20 g L−1 agar. These plate cultures were maintained at 4 °C. Strain MBG3964 was propagated using sugarcane molasses obtained from Racecourse Mill,

Results

The fermentative capabilities of three commercially available ADYs, which are currently sold to the corn–ethanol industry were tested against each other and no significant differences were observed between them in the corn mash fermentation protocol (results not published).

A total of 20 duplicate experiments were performed using the new strain MBG3964, while for one of the three commercial strains, a total of 10 duplicate experiments were performed by different operators. Post-amylase treatment

Inputs and assumptions for model

A relatively simple economic model was made for a corn to ethanol plant using dry grind milling and natural gas as its heat source. The economic inputs to the model were the prices of corn (CBOT Corn, 2010), natural gas (CBOT Natural Gas, 2010), gasoline (US Energy Information Agency, 2010), ethanol (Schmidt et al., 2009, CBOT Ethanol, 2010) and dry distillers grains (Shurson, 2007, USDA Iowa State, 2010). Example prices from October 2010 are ethanol (US$2.125 gal−1), gasoline (US$2.125 gal−1),

Conclusions

If the superior yeast strain described in this paper is capable of producing the improved performance parameters shown at the laboratory scale when scaled up, it will potentially result in a 4% reduction in energy required to produce a gallon of ethanol and an increase in profitability for the ethanol plants. Ethanol producer margins have been quite small since early 2007 and the improvements in income from such a yeast strain are significant with respect to the continued operation of many

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Novozymes Australia Pty Ltd., for providing the enzymes as a gift. This work was part-funded by an Australian Federal Government AusIndustry REDI Grant (RED04135).

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (7)

  • Performance of several Saccharomyces strains for the alcoholic fermentation of sugar-sweetened high-strength wastewaters: Comparative analysis and kinetic modelling

    2016, New Biotechnology
    Citation Excerpt :

    According to previous works [19,33], the specific energy consumption in ethanol distilleries can be estimated by:E (MJ/kgethanol) = 23.025 * [Ethanol Concentration (%w/v)]−0.8255 Using Eq. (8), the energy needed to distil the ethanol produced in the proposed fermentation process would be around 6.7 MJ/kg, while 2.84 MJ/kg is the estimated for ethanol production from steam-pretreated corn stover using simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) at high gravity conditions [19]. This difference should not be overemphasized, since the steam consumption in distillation represents only a 10–15% of the ethanol costs from corn or lignocellulosic biomass, being the raw material about a 70% and 50% of the costs in these processes, respectively [34].

  • Integration of Ethanol Fermentation with Second Generation Biofuels Technologies

    2014, Biorefineries: Integrated Biochemical Processes for Liquid Biofuels
  • A sustainable bioeconomy: The green industrial revolution

    2017, A Sustainable Bioeconomy: The Green Industrial Revolution
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text