Elsevier

Biotechnology Advances

Volume 27, Issue 6, November–December 2009, Pages 849-856
Biotechnology Advances

Research review paper
Yeast flocculation: New story in fuel ethanol production

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.06.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Yeast flocculation has been used in the brewing industry to facilitate biomass recovery for a long time, and thus its mechanism of yeast flocculation has been intensively studied. However, the application of flocculating yeast in ethanol production garnered attention mainly in the 1980s and 1990s. In this article, updated research progress in the molecular mechanism of yeast flocculation and the impact of environmental conditions on yeast flocculation are reviewed. Construction of flocculating yeast strains by genetic approach and utilization of yeast flocculation for ethanol production from various feedstocks were presented. The concept of self-immobilized yeast cells through their flocculation is revisited through a case study of continuous ethanol fermentation with the flocculating yeast SPSC01, and their technical and economic advantages are highlighted by comparing with yeast cells immobilized with supporting materials and regular free yeast cells as well. Taking the flocculating yeast SPSC01 as an example, the ethanol tolerance of the flocculating yeast was also discussed.

Introduction

Yeast flocculation is a non-sexual and reversible cell aggregation in which cells adhere to each other to form flocs (Stratford, 1989). The brewing industry often takes the advantage of the flocculation of brewer’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a simple and cost-effective way to separate yeast cells from fermentation products (Verstrepen et al., 2003). The proteins responsible for adhesion of cells to cells or cells to abiotic surfaces, which are called “adhesins” or “flocculins”, are cell wall proteins with different sugar binding properties. The mechanisms of adhesion were reviewed and categorized into two main groups by Verstrepen and Klis (2006): Lectin-like adhesion and sugar-insensitive adhesion. The lectin-like adhesion is caused by the binding of the lectin-like carbohydrate binding domain of the adhesins to sugar residues on the surface of other cells, whereas the sugar-insensitive adhesion depends on the binding of the adhesins to peptides or increased hydrophobic interactions between the cells and certain abiotic surfaces by the adhesion. Lectin-like yeast flocculation was further classified into two main categories: Flo1 and NewFlo (Stratford, 1989, Stratford and Assinder, 1991, Sieiro et al., 1995). The Flo1 type strains are constitutively flocculent, whose flocculation is only inhibited by mannose; whereas the NewFlo type strains start to flocculate in the stationary phase, and their flocculation is inhibited by both mannose and glucose. While most laboratory strains are of the Flo1 type, the majority of brewing yeasts belong to the NewFlo type (Sieiro et al., 1995), which need careful control of the conditions for the onset of their flocculation, because too early or too late flocculation leads to either sluggish fermentation or the need of centrifugation to recover the yeast cells (Heine et al., 2009); however, both the genetic and physiological control of the NewFlo type yeast flocculation have been proved to be highly complicated. The mechanisms of yeast flocculation and its application in the brewing industry were reviewed previously (Domingues et al., 2000, Verstrepen et al., 2003, Verstrepen and Klis, 2006). The recent years witness new progress in the genetic basis and regulation of yeast flocculation (Fichtner et al., 2007, Govender et al., 2008, Smukalla et al., 2008) as well as the genetic engineering applications of flocculating yeast for enzyme and ethanol production (Domingues et al., 2002, Guimarães et al., 2008, Wang et al., 2008).

Although the application of flocculating yeast in the brewing industry has a long history, its use in ethanol production is still very limited, particularly in the production of fuel ethanol at a commercial scale. In this article, updated research progress in the FLO genes responsible for yeast flocculation, their expression and regulation, recombinant manipulations and physiological factors affecting yeast flocculation is reviewed, and ethanol production with flocculating yeast from various feedstocks is evaluated. In the meantime, the self-immobilization of yeast cells through flocculation is revisited, and their advantages and disadvantages are illustrated by comparing with immobilized yeast cells with supporting materials and free yeast cells as well. Taking the self-flocculating yeast SPSC01 as an example, the ethanol tolerance of flocculating yeast was also discussed.

Section snippets

Genes responsible for yeast flocculation

Special cell surface proteins, which are encoded by the FLO (‘flocculation’) genes, are responsible for yeast flocculation and adhesion (attaching onto abiotic surfaces). Research in the FLO genes was reviewed (Teunissen and Steensma, 1995, Verstrepen et al., 2004, Verstrepen and Klis, 2006). In the commonly used laboratory strain S288C, the FLO gene family is composed of five genes: FLO1, FLO5, FLO9, FLO10 and FLO11 (Caro et al., 1997). The products of FLO5, FLO9 and FLO10 shared 96, 94 and

Physiological factors that affect yeast flocculation

Apart from genetic control and regulation, yeast flocculation can be triggered by various physiological factors, whose impacts on yeast flocculation are strain-specific and complicated, making the control of yeast flocculation through manipulating physiological factors very challengeable.

Ethanol production with flocculating yeast

Whereas the brewery industry has taken advantage of yeast flocculation for a long time to separate biomass at the end of fermentation, ethanol production using flocculent yeast strains received attention mainly in the 1980s and 1990s, with an objective to increase yeast cell density within fermentors to improve ethanol productivity, as illustrated by Prince and Barford (1982a) and Jones et al. (1985) with tower fermentors incorporating settling zones to retain flocculating yeast during

Conclusions

Yeast flocculation is a well known phenomenon in the brewing industry. However, there is much more to learn on genetic mechanism of yeast flocculation, and regulation of the FLO genes, as well as relevant physiological factors, which contribute to developing robust flocculent recombinants and effective control of yeast flocculation as well. The research in continuous ethanol fermentation with the self-flocculating yeast SPSC01 and its commercial application in fuel ethanol production

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the financial support of the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30500011 and 20576017) and High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (No. 2007AA10Z358). The authors thank Dr. Robin Dowell in Massachusetts Institute of Technology for sharing unpublished data about the new FLO genes from Σ1278b strain. We also thank the reviewers for their valuable comments. We apologize for omitting some related references due to space limitations.

References (82)

  • MaK. et al.

    Flocculation characteristics of an isolated mutant flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain and its application for fuel ethanol production from kitchen refuse

    Bioresour Technol

    (2009)
  • MorimuraS. et al.

    Ethanol production by repeated-batch fermentation at high temperature in a molasses medium

    J Ferment Bioeng

    (1997)
  • SharifmoghadamM.R. et al.

    The fission yeast Map4 protein is a novel adhesin required for mating

    FEBS Lett

    (2006)
  • SmukallaS. et al.

    FLO1 is a variable green beard gene that drives biofilm-like cooperation in budding yeast

    Cell

    (2008)
  • XuT.J. et al.

    Continuous ethanol production using self-flocculating yeast in a cascade of fermentors

    Enzyme Microb Technol

    (2005)
  • BaiF.W.

    Application of self-immobilization cell technology for biochemical engineering

    Chin Biotechnol

    (2000)
  • CaroL.H. et al.

    In silicio identification of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored plasma-membrane and cell wall proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Yeast

    (1997)
  • ChenH. et al.

    Feedback control of morphogenesis in fungi by aromatic alcohols

    Genes Dev

    (2006)
  • ClaroF.B. et al.

    Flocculation onset in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effect of ethanol, heat and osmotic stress

    J Appl Microbiol

    (2007)
  • CunhaA.F. et al.

    Control by sugar of Saccharomyces cerevisiae flocculation for industrial ethanol production

    FEMS Yeast Res

    (2006)
  • DietvorstJ. et al.

    Flocculation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is repressed by the COMPASS methylation complex during high-gravity fermentation

    Yeast

    (2008)
  • DobsonL.F. et al.

    The influence of morphology on geldanamycin production in submerged fermentations of Streptomyces hygroscopicus var. geldanus

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

    (2008)
  • DombekK.M. et al.

    Magnesium limitation and its role in apparent toxicity of ethanol during yeast fermentation

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (1986)
  • DominguesL. et al.

    Alcohol production from cheese whey permeate using genetically modified flocculent yeast cells

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (2001)
  • DominguesL. et al.

    Construction of a flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain secreting high levels of Aspergillus niger beta-galactosidase

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

    (2002)
  • DominguesL. et al.

    Applications of yeast flocculation in biotechnological processes

    Biotechnol Bioproc Eng

    (2000)
  • DouglasL.M. et al.

    Expression and characterization of the flocculin Flo11/Muc1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannoprotein with homotypic properties of adhesin

    Eukaryot Cell

    (2007)
  • DowellR.D. et al.

    From genotype to phenotype with whole genome comparisons

  • DranginisA.M. et al.

    A biochemical guide to yeast adhesins: glycoproteins for social and antisocial occasions

    Microbiol Mol Biol Rev

    (2007)
  • FengP.S. et al.

    Continuous fermentation with yeast (Shizosaccharomyces pombe) floccules for ethanol production

    Chin J Biotechnol

    (1989)
  • FerrariM.D. et al.

    Ethanol production from eucalyptus wood hemicellulose hydrolysate by Pichia stipitis

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (1992)
  • FichtnerL. et al.

    Differential Flo8p-dependent regulation of FLO1 and FLO11 for cell–cell and cell–substrate adherence of S. cerevisiae S288C

    Mol Microbiol

    (2007)
  • FidalgoM. et al.

    Adaptive evolution by mutations in the FLO11 gene

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2006)
  • GeX.M. et al.

    Online monitoring and characterization of flocculating yeast cell flocs during continuous ethanol fermentation

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (2005)
  • GibsonB.R. et al.

    Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling

    FEMS Microbiol Rev

    (2007)
  • GonzalesM.G. et al.

    Effect of temperature in the evaluation of yeast flocculation ability by the Helm’s method

    J Am Soc Brew Chem

    (1996)
  • GovenderP. et al.

    Controlled expression of the dominant flocculation genes FLO1, FLO5, and FLO11 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (2008)
  • GuimarãesP.M. et al.

    Fermentation of high concentrations of lactose to ethanol by engineered flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Biotechnol Lett

    (2008)
  • GuoB. et al.

    A Saccharomyces gene family involved in invasive growth, cell–cell adhesin and mating

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2000)
  • HeineF. et al.

    Prediction of flocculation ability of brewing yeast inoculates by flow cytometry, proteome analysis and mRNA profiling

    Cytometry Part A

    (2009)
  • Houghton-LarsenJ. et al.

    Fermentation of high concentrations of maltose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae is limited by the COMPASS methylation complex

    Appl Environ Microbiol.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (114)

    • Sugar fermentation: C2 (ethanolic) platform

      2023, Higher Alcohols Production Platforms: From Strain Development to Process Design
    • Evaluating the physiology and fermentation performance of the lager yeast during very high gravity brewing with increased temperature

      2023, LWT
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recycle of yeast cells is important in the beer industry for the economic benefits. Brewers often takes the advantage of flocculation of brewer's yeast as a simple and cost-effective way to separate yeast cells from fermentation liquids (Zhao & Bai, 2009). The harvested yeast should have high cell viability with strong cell vitality.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text