Elsevier

Body Image

Volume 6, Issue 2, March 2009, Pages 67-74
Body Image

The development of the Body Morph Assessment version 2.0 (BMA 2.0): Tests of reliability and validity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.01.006Get rights and content

Abstract

This study tested the psychometric characteristics of the Body Morph Assessment version 2.0 (BMA 2.0). A sample of 563 adults composed of four groups classified by gender and ethnicity (Caucasian men and women and African-American men and women) were studied. Support for the internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the BMA 2.0 was found for both men and women. A study of convergent validity was conducted. The BMA 2.0 was found to have adequate reliability and validity. Norms were established for the BMA 2.0 estimates of current body size (CBS), ideal body size (IBS), and acceptable body size (ABS) for Caucasian and African-American men and women. In summary, the BMA 2.0 is a reliable and valid computerized measure of CBS, IBS, ABS, the CBS–IBS discrepancy (body dissatisfaction), and provides an estimate of over/underestimation of body size as compared to individuals of the same sex and body mass index.

Introduction

Body image is a multifaceted construct with many dimensions that may be objectively studied (Thompson, 2004). This study tested the reliability and validity of a new computerized measure of body image called the Body Morph Assessment version 2.0 (BMA 2.0). The BMA 2.0 measures current body size estimates (CBS), ideal body size estimates (IBS), acceptable body size estimates (ABS), body image/size dissatisfaction (CBS–IBS discrepancy) (Williamson, Gleaves, Watkins, & Schlundt, 1993) and provides an estimate of body size over/underestimation as compared to individuals of the same sex and body mass index. For the purpose of the present study, body distortion/body size overestimation was defined as, “the degree to which an individual misperceives current body size” (Stewart & Williamson, 2004, p. 498). Body image/size dissatisfaction was defined as, “the discrepancy between an individual's perceived current body size and perceived ideal body size” (Stewart & Williamson, 2004, p. 498), which has been established as valid measure of body dissatisfaction (Williamson et al., 1993).

Researchers generally agree that body image is multidimensional phenomenon (Prunzinsky & Cash, 2002). There are three main dimensions that have been identified in the classification of assessment measures: (a) attitudinal measures, which examine the attitudinal, cognitive, and affective components of body image; (b) perceptual measures, which examine the size perception aspect of body image, e.g., over or underestimation of body size; and (c) behavioral measures, which assess behaviors related to body image including body checking and/or avoidance behaviors. Some figural stimuli measures, e.g., the Body Image Assessment (BIA; Williamson, Davis, Bennett, Goreczny, & Gleaves, 1989), Body Image Assessment for Obesity (BIA-O; Williamson et al., 2000), the Body Morph Assessment (BMA; Stewart, Williamson, Smeets, & Greenway, 2001) estimate both size estimation as well as measure body size dissatisfaction.

Over the years, many weaknesses of figural stimuli measures have been noted: Such weaknesses include: (a) coarse response scales, (b) method of presentation, (c) scales of measurement, and (d) content validity problems (Gardner, Friedman, & Jackson, 1998; Russell & Bobko, 1992; Russell, Pinto, & Bobko, 1991). For example, with the use of silhouettes, individuals are typically asked to select one choice from a limited number of choices for a continuous variable (body size) which has been shown to alter their responses (Russell and Bobko, 1992, Russell et al., 1991). Silhouette measures are often presented in a fashion where all cards are on the table at once and some measures even place cards in ascending order from smallest to largest body size. This method allows the individual to use other cards as a point of reference for their choices and allows for very high test–retest reliability. Most silhouette measures do not increase in size in equal intervals from one to the other which presents statistical problems (Gardner et al., 1998). Further, silhouette measures have questionable content validity as they are typically animated type drawings or grossly unrealistic sketches of human figures and it is difficult for individuals to relate to in reference to their own body. Few of these measures have been validated on obese populations, men, and different ethnic groups. Despite their weaknesses, figural stimuli measures are often selected for use because they provide a quick, unobtrusive measure of body image dissatisfaction for clinicians and researchers.

The BMA 2.0 addresses many of the difficulties associated with traditional figural stimuli measures of body image. The BMA 2.0 employs a continuous response scale in that it has 100 figures from the thin endpoint to the obese endpoint that increase in size equally throughout the measurement tool. In the method of presentation, the individual only sees one figure at a time in the form of a movie, so it appears to them that they are seeing one body that “grows” on a fine gradient. Therefore, they have no reference points by which to make choices for their given instruction, e.g., current body size, as they would if all the figures were presented to them at once. Finally, the figures are created from high quality graphic animation software that aimed to more closely represent human figures compared to existing figural stimuli methods. The figures are also matched for gender and race to the participant.

This new version of the BMA 2.0 replaces the original BMA (version 1.0) that was tested in an earlier study and found to be reliable and valid for measuring body image of Caucasian women (Stewart et al., 2001). The BMA 2.0 is designed for use with African-American and Caucasian men and women ranging from a very thin body size to an obese body size. The BMA 2.0 is an efficient (10–15 min to complete) and an unobtrusive (participants do not have to remove clothing or be photographed) measure. It captures the data from the assessment automatically to a spreadsheet format and the instructions for participants’ use is on board the program. Participants who have used it report it as a pleasant assessment experience.

Section snippets

Participants

The study sample included 563 participants recruited from universities, research studies, and the community. Participants who were recruited in the university setting (n = 358; 297 female, 162 male), signed up for the study via an online system and were given course credit for participation. Participants who were recruited as part of other research studies were offered the opportunity to participate in the BMA 2.0 and paid $10 per assessment to participate (n = 159; 88 female, 71 male). Individuals

Quality control

On the BMA 2.0, the figures begin at frame 1 (thinnest figure) and end at frame 100 (largest figure). In the trials, there is both forward and backward presentation (thin to obese, and obese to thin). The average of the four trials for each BMA 2.0 instruction, forward (two trials) and backward (two trials) is taken to form the official estimate for the trial. This procedure was established to control for anchoring effects, in which the participant may make choices that were influenced by the

Discussion

The BMA 2.0 was found to be a reliable and valid measure of body image in Caucasian women and men and African-American women and men. The BMA 2.0 represents a technological improvement to existing figural stimuli measures as it utilizes a wider range of stimuli (100 stimuli in range), it accommodates both sexes and different ethnic groups (i.e., African-American and Caucasian), it utilizes a fine grained assessment that allows for greater precision in measurement than previous measures of its

References (20)

  • J.K. Thompson

    The (mis)measurement of body image: Ten strategies to improve assessment for applied and research purposes

    Body Image

    (2004)
  • R. Aleong et al.

    Assessment of adolescent body perception: Development and characterization of a novel tool for morphing images of adolescent bodies

    Behavior Research Methods

    (2007)
  • E.G. Carmines et al.

    Reliability and viability assessment

    (1991)
  • P.J. Cooper et al.

    The development and validation of the Body Shape Questionnaire

    International Journal of Eating Disorders

    (1987)
  • R.M. Gardner et al.

    Methodological concerns when using silhouettes to measure body image

    Perceptual and Motor Skills

    (1998)
  • D. Harari et al.

    A computer-based method for the assessment of body-image distortions in anorexia-nervosa patients

    IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine: A Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

    (2001)
  • K. Hennighausen et al.

    The computer body image test: A procedure for the assessment of body image perception

    International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

    (1999)
  • T.P. Prunzinsky et al.

    Understanding body images: Historical and contemporary perspectives

  • Rzeznikiewicz, A. E., Williamson, D. A., Stewart, T. M., & Martin, C. K. (2005, November). Assessing body image...
  • C.J. Russell et al.

    Moderated regression analysis and Likert scales: Too coarse for comfort

    The Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1992)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (20)

  • Effect of 8 weeks of supervised overfeeding on eating attitudes and behaviors, eating disorder symptoms, and body image: Results from the PROOF and EAT studies

    2021, Eating Behaviors
    Citation Excerpt :

    The effect sizes were also large and the largest observed in both studies. The stability of ideal and acceptable body size was remarkable and in line with the literature (Stewart et al., 2009), as was the presumably accurate perception of increased current body size as a result of the weight gain in both studies. The increased body dissatisfaction well beyond overfeeding highlights the need for comprehensive treatment post-overfeeding to help people lose weight while also addressing body image dissatisfaction.

  • Association between self-perceived body image and body composition between the sexes and different age classes

    2021, Nutrition
    Citation Excerpt :

    The BIA-O figure scale designed by Williamson et al. [3] was used to evaluate the current body size (CBS) perception. As previously stated, this scale was initially used in studies on obesity and eating disorders, but it is a reliable method for assessing body image in the general population and “provides a quick, unobtrusive measure of different aspects of body image (e.g., dissatisfaction) for clinicians and researchers” [30]. Eighteen silhouettes of each sex, ranging from 1 (very thin) to 18 (very obese), were presented to participants and they were asked to choose the one that best represented their actual shape.

  • Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy Phase 2 (CALERIE Phase 2) screening and recruitment: Methods and results

    2013, Contemporary Clinical Trials
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is computer-based and self-administered. The reliability and the validity of the BMA 2.0 has been supported [11]. This measure served as a measurement for body dissatisfaction and body size over/under estimation in the present study.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text