7
Diagnosis of coeliac disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2005.02.006Get rights and content

The diagnosis of coeliac disease depends on the finding of characteristic, though not specific changes, of intraepithelial lymphocytosis, crypt hyperplasia and various degrees of villous height reduction identified in duodenal biopsies of individuals ingesting a gluten containing diet, together with symptomatic and histologic improvement on gluten withdrawal. Serologic testing has become the main mode of determining who will undergo biopsy. The IgA endomysial antibody and IgA tissue transglutaminase antibody have approximately 90% sensitivity and specificity, though there are reports of lower sensitivity and specificity in the clinical practice setting. This is due to lower titers of these antibodies in the presence of lesser degrees of mucosal damage. The widespread availability of serologic tests for coeliac disease allows the diagnosis to be considered by any physician. Gastroenterologists will be required to interpret the results of serologic tests and perform duodenal biopsies when indicated. Pathologists likewise need to be better acquainted with the more subtle changes of cell mediated immunity within the mucosa that are suggestive of underlying gluten sensitivity.

Section snippets

Who should have serologic testing?

The clinical suspicion of coeliac disease may be based on the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms, i.e. those with classical, diarrhea-predominant syptoms with or without a malabsorption syndrome. The next most common group in whom the diagnosis should be considered are those with manifestations of malabsorption of nutrients or vitamins. This includes patients with iron deficiency anemia in the absence of gastrointestinal bleeding, folic acid deficiency, manifestations of calcium or vitamin D

Serology testing

The widespread availability of serologic tests has permitted the diagnosis of coeliac disease to be considered and tested for by any physician. The most sensitive tests are based on the use of IgA isotypes. The available tests include antigliadin antibodies as well as connective tissue antibodies: reticulin, endomysial and tissue transglutaminase antibodies. The lower sensitivity and specificity of the antigliadin antibodies (70–80%) have resulted in their use being called into question for the

Selective IgA deficiency

Selective IgA deficiency (SIgAD) occurs more commonly in patients with coeliac disease than the general population.45 As a result, patients with coeliac disease lack IgA-EMA, IgA-tTG and IgA-antigliadin antibodies.46, 47 In order to detect coeliac disease in those with SIgAD a total IgA level should be incorporated into the testing for coeliac disease,47 as well as an IgG antibody-based test, either IgG-antigliadin or IgG-tTG.48

Seronegative coeliac disease

Several studies have demonstrated that serologic studies may lack sensitivity when used in the practice setting.26, 30, 49, 50 Reliance on EMA as a single test has, in fact, underestimated the prevalence of coeliac disease by at least 20–25%.26, 29, 30, 51 This is mainly due to the inclusion of patients with mild mucosal changes, a situation when patients may not express an EMA.25, 28, 49, 52, 53 A similar situation occurs with tissue transglutaminase, with titers decreasing as the mucosal

Role of HLA DQ2/DQ8 assessment

The HLA DQ2 is found in up to 90–95% of patients with coeliac disease, while most of the remaining patients are HLA DQ8.62, 63 However, these HLA alleles are found in up to 40% of the general population. They appear to be a necessary, but not sufficient, factor in the pathogenesis of coeliac disease. The role of determining whether an individual carries HLA DQ2 or DQ8 in the assessment of coeliac disease lies in their high negative predictive value.64 The main roles are in determining whether

Biopsy and histology

Biopsy of the small intestine remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of coeliac disease (Figure 2). Biopsies of the descending duodenum, rather than the more distal intestine seem sufficient for the diagnosis of coeliac disease.65, 66 Due to the patchy nature of villous changes in coeliac disease67, 68, 69 multiple biopsies are necessary, though standard sized forceps are sufficient.66

The recognition of the spectrum of histological changes in coeliac disease, as classified by Marsh1, 70 or

Endoscopic Markers of coeliac disease

Multiple endoscopic signs have been described in patients with coeliac disease. They include scalloping of folds,82 reduced or absent duodenal folds,83 mucosal fissures or grooves84 and visible vascularity of duodenal mucosa.85 However, these endoscopic signs are neither particularly sensitive for the diagnosis of coeliac disease,86, 87, 88 nor specific.75

Biopsy should be performed if the diagnosis of coeliac disease is considered, irrespective of the visual appearance of the mucosa. In

Other proposed antibody tests for coeliac disease

Antigliadin antibodies, EMA and tTG antibodies are recovered in duodenal secretions and stool of patients with coeliac disease90, 91, 92 as well as normal individuals,90, 91 some of whom may have latent gluten sensitivity in the absence of symptomatic coeliac disease.90, 93 IgA-tTG antibodies are also recovered in saliva of patients with coeliac disease94 and have been advocated as a non-invasive screening test for coeliac disease by some investigators,94 but not all.95 Recently both salivary

Conclusion

The diagnosis of coeliac disease depends on the finding of characteristic small intestinal pathological abnormalities together with clinical or histologic improvement on a gluten-free diet. Lesser degrees of mucosal change must be recognised as reactions to gluten in sensitised individuals and must, therefore, not be ignored or dismissed as ‘non-specific’. EMA and tTG antibodies have high sensitivity and specificity towards celiac disease, though there are some pitfalls in their use, as

References (96)

  • F. Cataldo et al.

    Celiac disease and selective immunoglobulin A deficiency

    J Pediatr

    (1997)
  • K. Rostami et al.

    Sensitivity of antiendomysium and antigliadin antibodies in untreated celiac disease: disappointing in clinical practice

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (1999)
  • R. Shamir et al.

    The use of a single serological marker underestimates the prevalence of celiac disease in Israel: a study of blood donors

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2002)
  • K. Rostami et al.

    SAT and serology in adult coeliacs, seronegative coeliac disease seems a reality

    Neth J Med

    (1998)
  • T.C. Johnson et al.

    Relationship of HLA-DQ8 and severity of celiac disease: comparison of New York and Parisian cohorts

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2004)
  • K. Kaukinen et al.

    HLA-DQ typing in the diagnosis of celiac disease

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2002)
  • S.M. Dandalides et al.

    Endoscopic small bowel mucosal biopsy: a controlled trial evaluating forceps size and biopsy location in the diagnosis of normal and abnormal mucosal architecture

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1989)
  • L.M. Siegel et al.

    Combined magnification endoscopy with chromoendoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected malabsorption

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1997)
  • K. Rostami et al.

    Sensitivity of antiendomysium and antigliadin antibodies in untreated celiac disease: disappointing in clinical practice

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (1999)
  • S. Kakar et al.

    Significance of intraepithelial lymphocytosis in small bowel biopsy samples with normal mucosal architecture

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2003)
  • B. Lebwohl et al.

    Giardiasis

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2003)
  • V.H. Shah et al.

    All that scallops is not celiac disease

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2000)
  • S. O'Mahony et al.

    Similarities in intestinal humoral immunity in dermatitis herpetiformis without enteropathy and in coeliac disease

    Lancet

    (1990)
  • H.J. Freeman et al.

    Multifocal small bowel lymphoma and latent celiac sprue

    Gastroenterology

    (1986)
  • M.N. Marsh

    Studies of intestinal lymphoid tissue. XIII. Immunopathology of the evolving celiac sprue lesion

    Pathol Res Pract

    (1989)
  • R. Troncone et al.

    In siblings of celiac children, rectal gluten challenge reveals gluten sensitization not restricted to celiac HLA

    Gastroenterology

    (1996)
  • M. Jabbari et al.

    Scalloped valvulae conniventes: an endoscopic marker of celiac sprue

    Gastroenterology

    (1988)
  • A.D. Smith et al.

    A prospective endoscopic study of scalloped folds and grooves in the mucosa of the duodenum as signs of villous atrophy

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1998)
  • S. Niveloni et al.

    Usefulness of videoduodenoscopy and vital dye staining as indicators of mucosal atrophy of celiac disease: assessment of interobserver agreement

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1998)
  • W. Dickey et al.

    Disappointing sensitivity of endoscopic markers for villous atrophy in a high-risk population: implications for celiac disease diagnosis during routine endoscopy

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2001)
  • M.T. Bardella et al.

    Reevaluation of duodenal endoscopic markers in the diagnosis of celiac disease

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2000)
  • A.S. Oxentenko et al.

    The insensitivity of endoscopic markers in celiac disease

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2002)
  • P.H. Green et al.

    Routine duodenal biopsies to exclude celiac disease?

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2003)
  • E. Arranz et al.

    Intestinal antibody pattern of celiac disease: occurrence in patients with normal jejunal biopsy histology

    Gastroenterology

    (1993)
  • A. Picarelli et al.

    Antiendomysial antibody detection in fecal supernatants: in vivo proof that small bowel mucosa is the site of antiendomysial antibody production

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2002)
  • U. Wahnschaffe et al.

    Celiac disease-like abnormalities in a subgroup of patients with irritable bowel syndrome

    Gastroenterology

    (2001)
  • M. Bonamico et al.

    Tissue transglutaminase autoantibody detection in human saliva: a powerful method for celiac disease screening

    J Pediatr

    (2004)
  • J.A.G.S. Walker-Smith et al.

    Revised criteria for diagnosis of coeliac disease. Report of Working Group of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

    Arch Dis Child

    (1990)
  • M.T. Bardella et al.

    Chronic unexplained hypertransaminasemia may be caused by occult celiac disease

    Hepatology

    (1999)
  • C. Sategna-Guidetti et al.

    Autoimmune thyroid diseases and coeliac disease

    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (1998)
  • C.C. Cronin et al.

    High prevalence of celiac disease among patients with insulin-dependent (type I) diabetes mellitus

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (1997)
  • A.H. Talal et al.

    Celiac disease in an adult population with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: use of endomysial antibody testing

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (1997)
  • L.M. Luft et al.

    Autoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase in Sjogren's syndrome and related rheumatic diseases

    J Rheumatol

    (2003)
  • W. Dickey et al.

    High prevalence of celiac sprue among patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

    J Clin Gastroenterol

    (1997)
  • R.L. Chin et al.

    Celiac neuropathy

    Neurology

    (2003)
  • G. Gobbi et al.

    Coeliac disease, epilepsy, and cerebral calcifications. The Italian Working Group on Coeliac Disease and Epilepsy

    Lancet

    (1992)
  • M. Hadjivassiliou et al.

    Idiopathic cerebellar ataxia associated with celiac disease: lack of distinctive neurological features

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • A. Fasano et al.

    Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study

    Arch Intern Med

    (2003)
  • Cited by (129)

    • Updates in the diagnosis and management of coeliac disease

      2023, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology
    • Histopathologic aspects of gluten-related disorders

      2021, Gluten-Related Disorders: Diagnostic Approaches, Treatment Pathways, and Future Perspectives
    • Celiac disease

      2020, Medicine (Spain)
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +44 121 378 2211; Fax: +44 121 3786095.

    View full text