Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 1027, Issues 1–2, 19 November 2004, Pages 67-72
Brain Research

Research report
Sciatic nerve regeneration in mice and rats: recovery of sensory innervation is followed by a slowly retreating neuropathic pain-like syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2004.08.036Get rights and content

Abstract

Peripheral nerve regeneration has been studied extensively in the sciatic nerve crush model, at the level of both function and gene expression. The crush injury allows full recovery of sensory and motor function in about 3 weeks as assessed by the foot reflex withdrawal test and De Medinacelli walking patterns. We used the recently developed CatWalk paradigm to study walking patterns in more detail in mice and rats. We found that, following the recovery of sensory function, the animals developed a state of mechanical allodynia, which retreated slowly over time. The motor function, although fully recovered with the conventional methods, was revealed to be still impaired because the animals did not put weight on their previously injured paw. The development of neuropathic pain following successful sensory recovery has not been described before in crush-lesioned animals and may provide an important new parameter to assess full sensory recovery.

Introduction

The sciatic nerve crush model is a well-characterized model for peripheral nerve regeneration. After a crush lesion, nerve fibers in the distal stump degenerate. Myelin and axon debris are removed by the process of Wallerian degeneration. The endoneurial tubes remain intact, enabling fast and qualitatively good anatomical and functional recovery [2], [7], [10], [23]. Fibers in the proximal nerve stump start to sprout and new axons extend through the distal endoneurial tube to reinnervate their target organs. During this process of axonal regeneration, numerous changes in morphology (chromatolysis) and gene expression occur in the neuronal cell bodies [1], [10], [11], [14].

Recently, a new method for gait analysis was described by one of us, the CatWalk [13]. This technique gives more detailed information on how the animal uses its paw during locomotion than the conventional techniques, e.g., the De Medinacelli method, which essentially measures the ability to use the muscles in the lower paw and foot [9]. The CatWalk has, for example, been successful in showing that animals suffering from neuropathic pain do not support weight upon their paw, although they do place it [26]. Neuropathic pain is a well-known phenomenon in nerve injury models with impaired regeneration, e.g., sciatic nerve transection, in models of neural inflammation, and in models with chronic nerve damage, e.g., chronic constriction injury (CCI) [5], [15], [22], [30].

We performed the sciatic nerve crush in mice and rats, and measured functional recovery of sensory and motor functions using the foot reflex withdrawal test and the De Medinacelli method. The CatWalk paradigm was used to investigate walking performance in more detail. In rats, tactile allodynia was also scored using von Frey filament testing. We demonstrate that, although full functional recovery of sensory and motor function occurred in both species, the animals developed a state of neuropathic pain which only became apparent after full sensory recovery as measured with the foot reflex withdrawal test was present. As such, recovery as assessed by the De Medinacelli method or the foot reflex withdrawal test indicates successful regeneration of damaged axons to their previous target area, but does not indicate renormalization of function.

Section snippets

Animals and surgery

All procedures in this study were performed in accordance with the Ethical Guidelines of the International Association for the Study of Pain [31] and were approved by the Ethical Committee on Animal Experiments of the University of Utrecht. A crush lesion was placed in both rats and mice in the sciatic nerve of the right paw, at mid-thigh level, as described by de Koning et al. [8]. In short, Wistar rats (Charles River) were anesthetized with Hypnorm® (Janssen Pharmaceutics, Tilburg, the

Results

We investigated recovery of sensory and motor functions in C57BL/6J mice and Wistar rats. Recovery of sensory function was assessed using the foot reflex withdrawal test. At 18 dpo, 5 of the 6 mice (86%) and at 20 dpo, 6/6 mice reacted to the 0.1 mA electric current, indicating recovery of sensory function (Fig. 1). At 20 dpo, 7 of the 10 rats, and at 21 dpo, 10/10 rats reacted to the 0.1 mA electric current. These observations indicate that the time course of sensory recovery was roughly

Discussion

These data indicate that although sensory and motor innervation of the paw were fully recovered at 24 dpo, the animals did not yet support their weight on the lesioned paw. The print area, although recovered on the photographic films (De Medinacelli method), where one does not need much pressure to get a print, did not return to normal in either rats or mice during the follow-up period when visualized with the CatWalk system. This reduction in pressure applied during stance was also shown by

References (31)

  • E. Verdú et al.

    Comparison of immunohistochemical and functional re-innervation of skin and muscle after peripheral nerve injury

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1997)
  • D.H. Vrinten et al.

    ‘CatWalk’ automated quantitative gait analysis as a novel method to assess mechanical allodynia in the rat; a comparison with von Frey testing

    Pain

    (2003)
  • H. Aldskogius et al.

    Axotomy-induced changes in primary sensory neurons

  • G. Allt

    Pathology of the peripheral nerve

  • R.P. Betts et al.

    A device for measuring plantar pressures under the sole of the foot

    Eng. Med.

    (1978)
  • Cited by (90)

    • Transcriptional Reprogramming of Distinct Peripheral Sensory Neuron Subtypes after Axonal Injury

      2020, Neuron
      Citation Excerpt :

      We observed that peripheral axotomy results in profound transcriptional reprogramming of DRG neurons, involving both induction of a common set of injury-response genes across neuronal subtypes and the coincident downregulation of genes that define transcriptional identity. This transcriptional reprogramming is reversible, as the transcriptional states of injured neuronal nuclei return to their naive states within weeks (Figures 5A, 5B, S3E, and S3F), coinciding with target reinnervation (Figure S5B) (Navarro et al., 1994; Vogelaar et al., 2004). Injury-induced transcriptional reprogramming leads to a new transcriptional state in which neuronal subtypes are difficult to distinguish by their gene expression profiles.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Currently working at MRC Cambridge University Centre for Brain Repair, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 2PY, United Kingdom.

    View full text