Mini-reviewDNA mismatch repair and the transition to hormone independence in breast and prostate cancer
Introduction
Breast cancer is both the most prevalent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women worldwide [1]. Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in men in the United States, second only to lung cancer in cancer-related deaths [2]. These cancers are not only similar in their epidemiological patterns, but also possess similar molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis and disease progression. Both breast and prostate cancer are hormone-related diseases. Steroid hormones, such as oestrogen, progesterone, and androgen as well as exogenous hormones contribute to the initiation and promotion of multistage carcinogenesis via specific steroid hormone receptors [3]. Hormone deprivation therapies inhibit cell growth and have provided significant improvements in survival in both diseases. Currently, anti-oestrogens are the most effective treatment option for women with oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, while androgen deprivation therapy is the prime therapeutic approach for men with advanced prostate cancer. However, hormone resistance remains a significant clinical problem and limits the benefits of these therapies in a considerable proportion of initially drug-responsive patients [4], [5], [6]. To date, curative treatments for advanced stages of both cancers are lacking. Indeed, an understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in the transition to hormone refractory disease is vital for the development of effective therapeutic and preventive strategies to combat these malignancies.
A large and compelling body of epidemiological and experimental data implicates oestrogen in the pathogenesis of breast and endometrial cancer (for review see [3], [7]). Similarly, androgens have been recognised to play an important role in controlling the growth of the normal prostate gland, and in promoting benign prostate hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma [8], [9], [10] however unlike breast cancer, serum sex hormone levels appear unrelated to prostate cancer risk [11]. The most commonly accepted risk factors for breast cancer include early menarche, late menopause, alcohol consumption, post-menopausal obesity and hormone replacement therapy [3]. Each of these risk factors increases one’s exposure to hormones. Hormones stimulate cell proliferation and thus increased exposure to these hormones promotes the opportunity to develop and accumulate random genetic errors. While a number of select candidate genes have been identified as biomarkers for breast and prostate cancer (such as those involved in hormone biosynthesis, activation, inactivation and transport) [12], [13], the molecular mechanisms involved in the progression to hormone independent disease are less well-understood.
Random genetic errors due to this increased proliferation occur simultaneously in genes not related to hormone manipulation and can drastically reduce a cell’s capacity for self-protection against random excitotoxic, metabolic and oxidative insults. Mutations in DNA repair genes have been associated with a mutator phenotype and confer resistance to cancer therapies [14], [15], [16]. In particular, the role of defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes in the pathogenesis of breast and prostate cancer has been investigated in the last decade. In this review, we will describe the experimental data supporting or contradicting the involvement of MMR defects in the development of breast and prostate cancer. In addition, we will explore the possible role of MMR deficiency in the transition to hormone independence. A number of recent observations imply a direct role for oestrogen in the regulation of MMR activity, but how this may relate to disease progression and what this may imply in terms of the mechanisms of androgen independence are unclear.
Section snippets
The DNA mismatch repair system
The mismatch repair (MMR) system is made up of a number of key components. Three heterodimers are required for efficient repair. Two MutS complexes, MutSα (MSH2/MSH6) and MutSβ (MSH2/MSH3), recognise base–base mismatches (MutS) and insertion-deletion loops (MutS). The heterodimer MutLα (MLH1/PMS2) is subsequently recruited by the MSH2 protein and forms a ternary complex with one of the MutS complexes. It then promotes the repair process via its endonucleolytic activity, coordinating the
Microsatellite instability as a marker of MMR deficiency
Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of MMR deficiency in HNPCC and results from mutations in the mismatch repair genes MLH1 or MSH2 or from gene inactivation associated with DNA promoter hypermethylation. Microsatellites are short nucleotide sequences (1–5 base pairs, repeated 15–30 times) which are normally relatively stable. Microsatellite instability (or replication error positive, RER+) is defined as loss or gain of microsatellite repeats at two or more loci [40]. In HNPCC, a
MSH2 upregulation may be a marker of disease progression in hormone dependent cancers
While reduced MSH2 expression has been observed during development from in situ to invasive breast cancer [49], thereafter increased MSH2 expression corresponds to an unfavorable prognosis and disease progression. Koster et al. reported that the expression of MSH2 correlated significantly with the expression of p53, with the appearance of distant metastases, low differentiation and the appearance of hemangiosis carcinomatosa and lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, while it negatively correlated with
Downregulation of MSH2 is associated with hormone independence
Downregulation of the MSH2 gene has been reported during progression of in situ lesions to invasive breast cancer [86], [87] and has also been associated with hormone-refractory prostate cancer [88] and so further work is required to reconcile these differences. In breast cancer, Koster et al. reported a weak negative correlation between MSH2-immuno-reactivity score (IRS) and the IRS of the oestrogen receptor (ER) [28]. Some suggested MSI was associated with negative expression of ER and PR
Conclusions
The mismatch repair system is a highly conserved post-replicative editing process that maintains genomic fidelity through the recognition and repair of incorrectly replicated nucleotides. A deficiency in any one of the genes involved reduces repair capacity. The involvement of MMR defects in the development of breast and prostate cancer remains unclear based on MSI analysis. However, a role for these defects in the development of a hormone independent phenotype is inferred by the apparent
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
References (94)
- et al.
The global breast cancer burden: variations in epidemiology and survival
Clin. Breast Cancer
(2005) - et al.
Studies on prostatic cancer: I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate 1941
J. Urol.
(2002) - et al.
Complete androgen blockade for prostate cancer: what went wrong?
J. Urol.
(2000) - et al.
Overexpression of the DNA mismatch repair factor, PMS2, confers hypermutability and DNA damage tolerance
Cancer Lett.
(2006) - et al.
DNA mismatch repair enzyme activity and gene expression in prostate cancer
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
(2001) - et al.
Truncation of the C-terminus of human MLH1 blocks intracellular stabilization of PMS2 and disrupts DNA mismatch repair
DNA Repair (Amst)
(2006) - et al.
Cancer risks for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: a population-based early onset case-family study
Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.
(2006) - et al.
New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the international collaborative group on HNPCC
Gastroenterology
(1999) - et al.
Allelic imbalance at the DNA mismatch repair loci, hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, hPMS2 and hMSH3 in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
Oral Oncol.
(2003) - et al.
Roles of mismatch repair proteins hMSH2 and hMLH1 in the development of sporadic breast cancer
Cancer Lett.
(2005)
Evidence for microsatellite instability in bilateral breast carcinomas
Cancer Lett.
Microsatellite instability in in situ and invasive sporadic breast cancers of Japanese women
Cancer Lett.
Microsatellite alterations indicating monoclonality in atypical hyperplasias associated with breast cancer
Hum. Pathol.
Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing for screening colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: part I. The utility of immunohistochemistry
J. Mol. Diagn.
Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing for screening colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: part II. The utility of microsatellite instability testing
J. Mol. Diagn.
Hypermethylation analysis of mismatch repair genes (hmlh1 and hmsh2) in locally advanced breast cancers in Indian women
Hum. Pathol.
The mismatch repair gene hMSH2 is mutated in the prostate cancer cell line LNCaP
J. Urol.
Tissue microarray analysis of hMSH2 expression predicts outcome in men with prostate cancer
J. Urol.
Mismatch repair gene MSH3 polymorphism is associated with the risk of sporadic prostate cancer
J. Urol.
Increasing oxidative damage and loss of mismatch repair enzymes during breast carcinogenesis
Eur. J. Cancer
Cancer statistics 2009
CA Cancer J. Clin.
Hormonal carcinogenesis
Carcinogenesis
Acquired tamoxifen resistance in human breast cancer–potential mechanisms and clinical implications
Anticancer Drug
Steroid hormones stimulate human prostate cancer progression and metastasis
Int. J. Cancer
The role of the androgen receptor in the development of prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer
Mol. Cell Biochem.
Decreased androgen-responsive growth of human prostate cancer is associated with increased genetic alterations
Clin. Cancer Res.
Endogenous sex hormones and prostate cancer: a collaborative analysis of 18 prospective studies
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
Cancer biomarkers: knowing the present and predicting the future
Future Oncol.
Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection
Nat. Rev. Cancer
Evidence for a connection between the mismatch repair system and the G2 cell cycle checkpoint
Cancer Res.
Mechanisms and functions of DNA mismatch repair
Cell Res.
Role of DNA mismatch repair defects in the pathogenesis of human cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.
DNA mismatch repair: functions and mechanisms
Chem. Rev.
The multifaceted mismatch-repair system
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
The mammalian mismatch repair protein MSH2 is required for correct MRE11 and RAD51 relocalization and for efficient cell cycle arrest induced by ionizing radiation in G2 phase
Oncogene
Involvement of mismatch repair in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair
Hum. Cell
Defective expression of the DNA mismatch repair protein, MLH1, alters G2-M cell cycle checkpoint arrest following ionizing radiation
Cancer Res.
Methylation-induced G(2)/M arrest requires a full complement of the mismatch repair protein hMLH1
Embo. J.
The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway links the DNA mismatch repair system to the G2 checkpoint and to resistance to chemotherapeutic DNA-methylating agents
Mol. Cell Biol.
The expression of mismatched repair genes and their correlation with clinicopathological parameters and response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
Int. Semin. Surg. Oncol.
Immunohistochemistry of proteins for DNA mismatch repair in correlation to prognostic factors of mammarian cancer
Oncol. Rep.
Genetic investigation of DNA-repair pathway genes PMS2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, OGG1 and MTH1 in sporadic colon cancer
Int. J. Cancer
Microsatellite instability and expression of mismatch repair genes in sporadic endometrial cancer coexisting with colorectal or breast cancer
Oncol. Rep.
MSH2 splice site mutation and endometrial cancer
Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer
MSI is frequently recognized among gastric cancer patients with a family history of cancer
Hepatogastroenterology
Loss of protein expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 with double primary carcinomas of the stomach and colorectum
Oncol. Rep.
Cited by (17)
Deregulated estrogen receptor signaling and DNA damage response in breast tumorigenesis
2021, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Reviews on CancerCitation Excerpt :Earlier studies on the cellular effects of estrogen, concentrated mainly on its regulatory functions like proliferation, growth and apoptosis, but not DDR [71]. However, there are evidences suggesting ER-α signaling to be a key regulator of DDR effector proteins like ATM, ATR, BRCA1 and p53 and that DNA damage repair deficiency is linked to loss of ER-α and as well as androgen receptor (AR) [63]. A study conducted in 270 treatment-naive breast cancer patients revealed that the Damage repair capacity (DRC) was in positive correlation with the ER-α status, and the loss of ER led to reduced damage processing ability in UVC treated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) [64].
Expressional analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 in breast cancer
2019, Current Problems in CancerLynch syndrome and risk of prostate cancer; review of the literature
2015, Progres en UrologieBenzo[α]pyrene repressed DNA mismatch repair in human breast cancer cells
2013, ToxicologyCitation Excerpt :In the present study, we found that BaP exposure repressed DNA MMR activity in human breast carcinoma cells, which may represent an additional mechanism that contributing to PAH-mediated carcinogenesis. It is likely that MMR system may mainly involve in cancer progression rather than initiation as MMR defects have been associated with transition to hormone independence in both breast and prostate cancer (Martin et al., 2010). Therefore, MMR may only play a minor role in removal of PAH–DNA adducts at the onset of a mutagenesis event, but function as the main repair pathway during mutagenesis progression when some DNA adducts escape from the initial nuclear excision repair and cause base mispairing later on.
Mismatch Repair Proteins in Recurrent Prostate Cancer
2013, Advances in Clinical ChemistryCitation Excerpt :It has further been speculated that high MSH2 expression increases ER alpha signaling, which as a consequence regulates the proliferation rate and might trigger telomerase activity [80]. An interesting hypothesis proposes cyclical expression for MSH2, with downregulation in early stages of carcinogenesis, increased during phases of Gleason scores 5–7 and again decreased between Gleason scores 7 and 10 [81]. A similar, though inverted, trend was seen for increased PMS2, which showed highest elevation in grade 3 tumors (Fig. 2.4; Table 2.2) [71].