Laboratory diet profoundly alters gene expression and confounds genomic analysis in mouse liver and lung

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2008.02.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Nutritional studies in laboratory animals have long shown that various dietary components can contribute to altered gene expression and metabolism, but diet alone has not been considered in whole animal genomic studies. In this study, global gene expression changes in mice fed either a non-purified chow or a purified diet were investigated and background metal levels in the two diets were measured by ICP-MS. C57BL/6J mice were raised for 5 weeks on either the cereal-based, non-purified LRD-5001 diet or the purified, casein-based AIN-76A diet, as part of a larger study examining the effects of low dose arsenic (As) in the diet or drinking water. Affymetrix Mouse Whole Genome 430 2.0 microarrays were used to assess gene expression changes in the liver and lung. Microarray analysis revealed that animals fed the LRD-5001 diet displayed a significantly higher hepatic expression of Phase I and II metabolism genes as well as other metabolic genes. The LRD-5001 diet masked the As-induced gene expression changes that were clearly seen in the animals fed the AIN-76A diet when each dietary group was exposed to 100 ppb As in drinking water. Trace metal analysis revealed that the LRD-5001 diet contained a mixture of inorganic and organic As at a total concentration of 390 ppb, while the AIN-76A diet contained approximately 20 ppb. These findings indicate that the use of non-purified diets may profoundly alter observable patterns of change induced by arsenic and, likely, by other experimental treatments, particularly, altering gene and protein expression.

Introduction

Nutritional studies in laboratory animals have long shown that various dietary components can substantially influence expression of individual genes and proteins and also alter metabolism, but to date the effects of diet alone have not been carefully considered in whole animal genomic studies. Gene arrays are a powerful tool for examining global patterns of gene expression and can greatly aid in understanding underlying mechanisms of action, such as pharmacological or toxicological investigations of the effects of drugs and toxicants in vivo [1]. However, many other variables, which are often not controlled for in experimental designs, can also influence gene expression, confounding the effects of the experimental treatment. A number of these factors, including housing, handling, diurnal cycles, euthanasia, and necropsy procedures, have previously been shown to alter gene expression patterns [2], [3].

Laboratory animal diets fall into three main categories: cereal-based (non-purified), purified, and chemically defined [4]. This study compared the global effects of a purified (AIN-76A) and non-purified diet (LRD-5001) on gene expression using whole genome microarrays. Recent insights have indicated the importance of a carefully controlled laboratory diet, as a number of publications have reported that variability in estrogenic activity in lab diets, particularly from isoflavones, can greatly affect experimental results [5], [6], [7], [8], while others have reported the variable contamination of chow with toxicants of interest [9], [10]. In addition, considerable lot-to-lot variability has also been reported for normal constituents [8], [11]. Laboratory diets can be either an open formula, in which the exact composition is readily available to consumers, or a closed formula, in which the exact composition is known only by the manufacturer [12]. In many closed diets, the protein, fat, and carbohydrate sources vary from lot-to-lot, as do the proportions of these ingredients, based on product availability and cost.

The AIN-76A diet is a purified diet introduced in 1977 by the American Institute of Nutrition (AIN) for use with experimental rodents. The major source of protein is casein and the diet contains purified and refined sources of minerals and vitamins in standard proportions with minimal variability from lot-to-lot [4], [13]. While the importance of laboratory diet has become clear, the type of diet in not commonly reported in the published toxicogenomics literature or is listed as standard lab chow, and many animal housing facilities continue to use such cereal-based, non-purified, non-refined diets. One of the more commonly used is the Purina Laboratory Rodent diet 5001 (LRD-5001). The LRD-5001 chow is a closed formula consisting of variable sources of protein, one of which is fish meal (a probable source of arsenic and other contaminants) and the ingredients and proportions in this diet vary according to raw material availability and price. It was recently reported that this diet contained varying and often high concentrations of methylmercury, likely due to the fishmeal, which was shown to have an impact on experimental results [9].

The goal of in vivo gene array studies is to reveal gene expression patterns associated with a specific treatment variable. However, a diet with high and variable background levels of the toxicant under investigation can potentially skew or mask results. In addition, it is well known that specific dietary components can be potent inducers or inhibitors of specific gene or protein expression or inhibit certain metabolic enzymes. The composition of the LRD-5001 diet and results of previous studies led us to examine the background levels of metals in this chow, particularly since our laboratory investigates the mechanism underlying the toxicity of arsenic (As) and other toxic metals of concern. Arsenic is classified as a human carcinogen by the U.S. EPA and the World Health Organization [14], [15], and chronic ingestion has been associated with increased risk of a number of serious diseases including various cancers, type II diabetes, cardiovascular disease and reproductive and developmental abnormalities [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. In numerous published studies, As has been shown to interfere with a wide variety of physiological processes, including DNA repair [21], [22], [23], endocrine signaling [24], [25], [26], [27], and immune function [28], [29]. This study was conducted as part of a larger experiment investigating altered patterns of gene expression in the liver and lung in response to low dose As exposure administered through the diet or in drinking water. As part of this larger study, two groups of animals were fed either the non-purified LRD-5001 lab chow or the purified AIN-76A diet. Sub-groups from each diet background were exposed to As at 10 or 100 ppb in the drinking water (ad lib) or 10 ppb added to each diet for 5 weeks. This study revealed a significant alteration in the gene expression pattern in the livers and lungs of the mice as a direct result of diet. Moreover, while the animals on the purified diet showed a striking and consistent pattern of altered gene expression as a result of As exposure, these effects were largely masked by the non-purified diet, due to the dominant pattern of effects from the diet itself on many of these same pathways.

Section snippets

Animal husbandry

All animal studies were conducted in accordance with AALAC approved guidelines using a protocol approved by IACUC at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center. Six-week-old C57BL/6J male mice (NCI APA breeding stock, Frederick MD) were housed in ventilated cages with autoclaved nanopure water (ad lib), autoclaved bedding, and autoclaved LRD-5001 or AIN-76A chow (ad lib) that had been specially formulated for this study by the manufacturer with or without addition of 10 ppb sodium

Trace metal contaminants in laboratory chow

Table 1 outlines several trace metal concentrations in the LRD-5001 and AIN-76A diets as measured by ICP-MS. All the measured trace metals were increased in the non-purified chow as compared to the AIN-76A, with the exceptions of chromium and manganese, which are added to the AIN-76A diet for nutritional value. Many of the metals present in the LRD-5001 diet (including copper, zinc, and manganese) are also added for potential nutritional value and the metal concentrations in both diets have

Discussion

Our initial impetus for this study was the concern over high levels of dietary As in standard laboratory chow. Trace metal analysis revealed that the LRD-5001 non-purified chow contained a total of 390 ppb of As, whereas the purified AIN-76A diet contained a total of approximately 20 ppb As (which was too low to speciate). While we observed no obvious physiological differences between the two groups of mice during the course of the experiment, whole genome analysis of the transcriptome from liver

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH-NIEHS grant P42 ES007373 (JWH, Superfund Basic Research Program (SBRP) Project, Project 2). CDK, APN and JAG were supported by graduate and postdoctoral fellowships from P42 ES007373 (SBRP, Training Core). The authors thank Drs. Ausra Milano and Craig Tomlinson, and Joseph Dionne at Dartmouth's Genomics Shared Resource Laboratory (Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH) for running the microarray samples.

References (48)

  • H.C. Causton et al.

    Microarray Gene Expression Data Analysis, A Beginner's Guide

    (2003)
  • AIN

    Report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc Committee on Standards for Nutritional Studies

    J. Nutr.

    (1977)
  • Y.H. Ju et al.

    Dietary genistein negates the inhibitory effect of tamoxifen on growth of estrogen-dependent human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells implanted in athymic mice

    Cancer Res.

    (2002)
  • M.N. Jensen et al.

    How isoflavone levels in common rodent diets can interfere with the value of animal models and with experimental results

    Lab. Anim.

    (2007)
  • J.E. Thigpen et al.

    Selecting the appropriate rodent diet for endocrine disruptor research and testing studies

    ILAR J.

    (2004)
  • M.N. Mead

    The feed factor: estrogenic variability in lab animal diets

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (2006)
  • B. Weiss et al.

    Methylmercury contamination of laboratory animal diets

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (2005)
  • P.M. Newberne

    Influence of pharmacological experiments of chemicals and other factors in diets of laboratory animals

    Fed. Proc.

    (1975)
  • ASTDR

    Toxicological Profile for Arsenic (update)

    (1999)
  • NRC

    Arsenic in Drinking Water

    (1999)
  • A.H. Smith et al.

    Cancer risks from arsenic in drinking water

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (1992)
  • ATSDR

    Toxicological Profile for Arsenic (Draft for Publish Comment)

    (2005)
  • C.O. Abernathy et al.

    Arsenic: health effects, mechanisms of actions, and research issues

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (1999)
  • C. Watanabe et al.

    Effects of arsenic on younger generations

    J. Environ. Sci. Health

    (2003)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Analytical strategies to measure toxicity and endocrine-disrupting effects of herbicides: Predictive toxicology

      2021, Herbicides: Chemistry, Efficacy, Toxicology, and Environmental Impacts
    • Disruption of essential metal homeostasis in the brain by cadmium and high-fat diet

      2020, Toxicology Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mice were housed in a pathogen-free AAALAC-accredited facility and all procedures were approved by the University of Louisville’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. One week after the animals arrived, diets were changed to AIN-76A purified diet (Envigo) to limit the confounding effects of metal contamination found in standard chow [36]. Food and deionized water were provided ad libitum.

    • Nutriphenomics in Rodent Models

      2019, Biomarkers in Toxicology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Department of Biochemistry, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, United States.

    View full text