Metallocenter assembly of the hydrogenase enzymes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.01.011Get rights and content

The biosynthesis of the [NiFe]- and [FeFe]-hydrogenase enzymes requires the activities of multiple proteins that assemble the intricate metallocenters on the enzyme precursor proteins in an energy-dependent process. These accessory proteins include enzymes that synthesize the non-protein iron ligands as well as metallochaperones for the delivery of nickel to the [NiFe]-hydrogenase. Over the past few years many of these proteins have been examined in vitro. The biochemical properties, in the context of the earlier genetic studies, provide a basis for assigning function to the individual accessory proteins and mapping out the sequential steps of the metallocenter assembly pathways. This framework will serve as a foundation for detailed mechanistic analysis of these complex biomolecular factories.

Introduction

Metalloproteins contain either a single metal ion or more intricate centers that can include polynuclear clusters, modified amino acids and exogenous ligands. Inorganic prosthetic groups require an extra degree of cellular control because of the inherent toxicity of the metal ions as well as the complexity of the metal clusters on the protein scaffold. Nature meets these challenges with helper proteins dedicated to handling specific metal ions and the assembly of the metalloenzyme centers [1, 2]. These proteins guarantee delivery of the correct metal even under conditions of low intracellular availability, minimize any potential harmful effects of the inorganic and organic pieces, catalyze the synthesis of any components not readily available, and ensure complete assembly and localized placement of the clusters in the enzyme proteins.

The hydrogenase enzymes, which catalyze the reversible oxidation of hydrogen gas, enable an organism to use molecular hydrogen as a source of energy or to use protons as a sink for excess reducing equivalents [3]. These enzymes are divided into three phylogenetically distinct classes that differ in metal content: [NiFe], [FeFe] and ‘iron–sulfur cluster-free’ [3, 4, 5, 6•]. The latter enzymes, which used to be called ’metal-free’, are now known to contain a mononuclear iron center that has not yet been completely defined ([6] and references therein), and nothing is yet known about the biosynthesis of this site. By contrast, significant progress has been made in understanding the assembly of the [NiFe] hydrogenase active site, and the accessory proteins for the [FeFe] active site production were recently identified and characterized. This information about the activities of the individual accessory proteins has generated distinct, multi-step models for the two biosynthetic pathways.

Section snippets

[NiFe] cluster

The dinuclear catalytic center of the [NiFe] enzyme, which is bound to the larger subunit of the dimeric protein, is composed of a nickel ion bound to four cysteine residues, two of which bridge to an iron ion that is also coordinated to one CO and two CN ligands (Figure 1) [5]. In Escherichia coli, which expresses at least three [NiFe] hydrogenases [3], most of the accessory proteins required for the biosynthesis of this metallocenter are encoded by the hyp (hydrogenase pleiotropic) genes

[FeFe] cluster

The active site metallocenter in the [FeFe] enzymes, called the H cluster (Figure 1), contains two iron ions bound to multiple CO and CN ligands and bridged by an organic cofactor proposed to be di(thiomethyl)amine or 1,3-propanedithiolate [4, 40]. One of these irons is ligated by a cysteine residue that also connects the catalytic site to a [4Fe–4S] cluster. Hyp homologs were not found in organisms expressing only [FeFe] hydrogenases, suggesting that this active site is assembled by distinct

Fe–S cluster

In addition to the biosynthesis of dinuclear catalytic clusters, [NiFe] and [FeFe] hydrogenases possess domains or separate subunits containing Fe–S clusters that are required for moving electrons from upstream donors or to downstream acceptors [3]. The production of the final enzyme requires the biosynthesis of these Fe–S clusters as well as, in some cases, processing of these subunits, association with the catalytic subunit and transfer through membranes [8]. A dedicated biosynthetic pathway

Conclusions

Despite the similar structures of the hydrogenase metallocenters, they are assembled by distinct accessory protein factors. However, there are some common themes in the biosynthetic pathways. The biosynthesis of the metallocenters for [NiFe]- and [FeFe]-hydrogenases both employ GTPases with similar postulated roles, as nickel metallochaperone for [NiFe]-hydrogenases and iron cluster transfer for [FeFe]-hydrogenases. Both [FeFe]- and [NiFe]-hydrogenases have iron centers with CN and CO ligands

Update

A recent analysis of Helicobacter pylori HypA by X-ray absorption spectroscopy revealed a dynamic coordination environment around the zinc ion [54]. In the presence of nickel the zinc is bound in a tetrathiolate coordination sphere, as predicted for the E. coli protein [19]. However, in the absence of nickel one of the cysteines is replaced by an N or O donor. This structural change around the zinc suggests that it has a role in nickel binding.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canada Research Chairs Program.

References (54)

  • J.W. Zhang et al.

    A role for SlyD in the Escherichia coli hydrogenase biosynthetic pathway

    J Biol Chem

    (2005)
  • C. Scholz et al.

    SlyD proteins from different species exhibit high prolyl isomerase and chaperone activities

    Biochemistry

    (2006)
  • I. Kansau et al.

    Nickel binding and immunological properties of the C-terminal domain of the Helicobacter pylori GroES homologue (HspA)

    Mol Microbiol

    (1996)
  • B. Bleijlevens et al.

    The auxiliary protein HypX provides oxygen tolerance to the soluble [NiFe]-hydrogenase of Ralstonia eutropha H16 by way of a cyanide ligand to nickel

    J Biol Chem

    (2004)
  • G. Butland et al.

    Interactions of the Escherichia coli hydrogenase biosynthetic proteins: HybG complex formation

    FEBS Lett

    (2006)
  • X. Brazzolotto et al.

    The [Fe-Fe]-hydrogenase maturation protein HydF from Thermotoga maritima is a GTPase with an iron-sulfur cluster

    J Biol Chem

    (2006)
  • R.M. Cicchillo et al.

    Escherichia coli lipoyl synthase binds two distinct [4Fe-4S] clusters per polypeptide

    Biochemistry

    (2004)
  • A. Scrima et al.

    The structure of the TrmE GTP-binding protein and its implications for tRNA modification

    EMBO J

    (2005)
  • S.S. Mansy et al.

    Iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis: toward an understanding of cellular machinery and molecular mechanism

    Acc Chem Res

    (2004)
  • D.C. Johnson et al.

    Structure, function, and formation of biological iron-sulfur clusters

    Annu Rev Biochem

    (2005)
  • H. Manyani et al.

    Gene products of the hupGHIJ operon are involved in maturation of the iron-sulfur subunit of the [NiFe] hydrogenase from Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae

    J Bacteriol

    (2005)
  • A. Dubini et al.

    Assembly of Tat-dependent [NiFe] hydrogenases: identification of precursor-binding accessory proteins

    FEBS Lett

    (2003)
  • J. Kuchar et al.

    Biosynthesis of metal sites

    Chem Rev

    (2004)
  • A. Volbeda et al.

    The active site and catalytic mechanism of NiFe hydrogenases

    Dalton Trans

    (2003)
  • M. Blokesch et al.

    Metal insertion into NiFe-hydrogenases

    Biochem Soc Trans

    (2002)
  • A. Böck et al.

    Maturation of hydrogenases

    Adv Microb Physiol

    (2006)
  • G. Winter et al.

    A model system for [NiFe] hydrogenase maturation studies: purification of an active site-containing hydrogenase large subunit without small subunit

    FEBS Lett

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text