Letter to the Editor

M22 based (manual) ELISA for TSH-receptor antibody (TRAb) measurement is more sensitive than 2nd generation TRAb assays

The liver asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) is the only organ-specific autoantigenic target in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients and corresponding autoantibodies (Abs) have been suggested aiding in the serology of autoimmune liver diseases (ALD).

A novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) employing purified rabbit ASGPR was used to detect ASGPR Abs in patients with ALD and controls. ASGPR Ab was determined in sera from 172 patients with AIH type 1, AIH type 2 (n = 42), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) (n = 113), cryptogenic liver disease (n = 30), toxic liver disease (n = 11), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (n = 27), HCV infection (n = 25), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (n = 43) and 100 blood donors. ASGPR Ab positivity was compared with AIH-related Abs (ANA, ASMA, Abs to LKM-1, LC-1, and SLA/LP) in patients with AIH.

Patients with AIH-1 and AIH-2 demonstrated an ASGPR Ab prevalence of 29.1% and 16.7%, respectively. ASGPR Ab positivity in patients with AIH-1 and AIH-2 was not significantly different to those in patients with PSC and HCV (p > 0.05, respectively). ASGPR Ab levels in all study cohorts were significantly different with the highest medians in patients with AIH, PSC, and HCV infection (p < 0.0001). ASGPR Ab can be found as only AIH-specific Ab determined by LIA and ELISA in 24.4% of AIH patients (48/197).

The novel ASGPR Ab ELISA is a specific diagnostic tool for ASGPR Ab detection in AIH. In addition to AIH, patients with PSC can demonstrate elevated ASGPR Ab amongst those with ALD suggesting a tolerance break to ASGPR in PSC.

Crohn's disease (CD) is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterized by reactivity against microbial and self antigens. Zymogen granule glycoprotein 2 (GP2) was identified as the major autoantigen of CD-specific pancreatic autoantibodies (PAB).

Human GP2 was expressed in the Spodoptera frugiperda 9 (Sf9) cell line using the baculovirus system, purified by Ni-chelate chromatography, and used as antigen for anti-GP2 IgA and IgG assessment by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Antibodies to mannan of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA), PAB, and anti-GP2 were investigated in sera of 178 CD patients, 100 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, and 162 blood donors (BD).

Anti-GP2 IgG and IgA were found in 48/72 (66.7%) and 23/72 (31.9%) PAB positive and 5/106 (4.7%) and 1/106 (0.9%) PAB negative CD patients (p < 0.0001), respectively. CD patients displayed significantly higher reactivity to GP2 than UC patients and BD (p < 0.0001), respectively. Occurrence of anti-GP2 antibodies correlated with PAB reactivity (Spearmen's rho = 0.493, p < 0.00001). There was a significant relationship between the occurrence of ASCA IgG and anti-GP2 IgG (p = 0.0307).

Anti-GP2 IgG and IgA constitute novel CD specific autoantibodies, the quantification of which could improve the serological diagnosis of IBD.

Commercial assays to measure thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor (TSHR) autoantibodies (TRAb) have been available for the serological diagnosis of autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD) for several years. The widespread assessment of this parameter has identified Graves' disease (GD) as a common organ-specific autoimmune disease. Within the present article we aim to review immunobiological and epidemiological aspects as well as diagnostic methods available for the detection of TRAb. Over the last decade, TRAb detection in GD became more sensitive since TRAb assays were being largely improved by named research groups. Therefore, functional assay (fas) and diagnostic sensitivity of current TRAb assays will be discussed. Within the second part of this review we will focus on clinical applications of TRAb measurement for outcome prediction of GD as well as the importance of this method to distinguish GD from other AITD.

The liver-specific ASGPR is an autoantigen in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients. Anti-ASGPR antibody correlates with disease activity, however, only in-house assays have been reported so far.

Rabbit ASGPR was purified by affinity chromatography on galactose-Sepharose and used for standardised detection of anti-ASGPR by ELISA. Anti-ASGPR IgG was measured in sera from 45 patients with AIH, PBC (n = 43), alcoholic liver disease (n = 13), HBV infection (n = 35), HCV infection (n = 53), and 118 blood donors. Anti-ASGPR was correlated with biochemical parameters of disease activity in 22 AIH patients with consecutive samples.

Twenty-one of 30 untreated (70%) and five of 15 treated AIH patients (30%) showed elevated anti-ASGPR at first presentation. Only one blood donor demonstrated anti-ASGPR. ALD and PBC patients were all negative. ROC curve analysis of AIH and disease-control patients revealed a sensitivity of 77.8% and a specificity of 99.4%. Three (8.6%) of 35 HBV and 7 (13.2%) of 53 HCV patients demonstrated elevated anti-ASGPR. In AIH patients, anti-ASPGR correlated with liver-transaminases levels. In 22 follow-up patients, elevation of anti-ASPGR preceded liver-transaminases increase.

The novel anti-ASGPR ELISA is a readily available and specific diagnostic tool for anti-ASGPR detection in AIH. Quantification of anti-ASGPR is helpful in monitoring disease activity.

We compared the clinical performances of two new M22-based assays for TSH-receptor antibody (TRAb) with those of the human TRAb assay (hTRAK) in Graves' disease patients at the end of treatment.

Sera were obtained from 128 Graves' patients treated for 18 months with antithyroid drugs. Sixty-six remained in remission and sixty-two had relapse of hyperthyroidism in a 3-year follow-up after discontinuing treatment. TRAbs were measured using two M22-based methods (electrochemiluminescence using the Cobas® or ELISA using the Medizym® TRAb clone) and with the hTRAK.

At T18, the results were significantly higher by the Cobas® assay (median: 2.7 IU/L, range: 1.1–18.5 IU/L) or lower by ELISA (median: 0.56 IU/L, range: 0.22–14.8 IU/L) than those obtained for the hTRAK (median: 1.5 IU/L, range: 0.9–9.8 IU/L). The use of cut-off limits at 1.9 IU/L, 3.2 IU/L and 0.94 IU/L gave similar and higher prevalences of TRAb-positive patients in the group of relapse as compared to the remission group. However, some patients remained misclassified in each remission or relapse group.

The M22-based TRAb assays did not improve the predictive value of relapse obtained with the hTRAK measured at the end of treatment. High inter-method variability requires assay harmonization for correct interpretation of results.