Diverse mechanisms regulate stem cell self-renewal

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2004.09.004Get rights and content

To what extent are the pathways that regulate self-renewal conserved between stem cells at different stages of development and in different tissues? Some pathways play a strikingly conserved role in regulating the self-renewal of diverse stem cells, whereas other pathways are specific to stem cells in certain tissues or at certain stages of development. Recent studies have highlighted differences between the self-renewal of embryonic, fetal and adult stem cells. By understanding these similarities and differences we may come to a molecular understanding of how stem cells replicate themselves and why aspects of this process differ between stem cells.

Introduction

Self-renewal is the process by which a stem cell divides to generate one (asymmetric division) or two (symmetric division) daughter stem cells with developmental potentials that are indistinguishable from those of the mother cell (Figure 1). The ability of stem cells to self-renew extensively is central to development, as well as to the maintenance of adult tissues. Despite the importance of stem cell self-renewal, we are only beginning to understand how it is regulated.

Self-renewal allows stem cells to replicate themselves with apparently high fidelity while preserving their broad developmental potential and their massive replicative potential. Studies over the past few years have dramatically expanded our understanding of how self-renewal is regulated at a genetic level, yielding several insights. First, the coordinate activities of multiple pathways are required for a stem cell to self-renew. These include pathways whose function is conserved between diverse types of stem cells as well as pathways that are restricted to certain types of stem cells. Second, one reason that multiple pathways are required is that self-renewal involves both proliferation and the maintenance of an undifferentiated state (Figure 1). Some pathways that are necessary for self-renewal appear to regulate only proliferation, while other pathways regulate developmental potential and/or differentiation, and some pathways regulate both (Figure 2). Third, stem cells from different tissues or at different stages of development also differ in the mechanisms they use to regulate their self-renewal (Figure 3) because of differences in developmental potential (e.g. pluripotentiality versus multipotentiality), fate, and constraints on their proliferation. We will review these similarities and differences among stem cells in an effort to discern the principles underpinning the mechanisms that regulate self-renewal.

Section snippets

Embryonic stem cells: unique cells that depend on unique pathways to self-renew

Embryonic stem (ES) cells are pluripotent cells that self-renew in culture and can be propagated indefinitely. ES cell self-renewal requires the coordinate action of multiple pathways, some of which are unique to pluripotent cells (Figure 2). Oct4, a POU domain transcription factor, and the divergent homeodomain protein Nanog are necessary for the maintenance of pluripotentiality in inner-cell-mass cells (the cells in the blastocyst that give rise to ES cell lines in culture). In the absence of

Temporal changes in the self-renewal of germline stem cells

Germline stem cells, the precursors of gametes, bridge the transition from embryonic to adult stem cells. Gametogenesis begins with embryonic precursors known as primordial germ cells, which are detected by E7.5 in the mouse. Primordial germ cells differentiate into spermatogonial stem cells in males and oocyte stem cells in females after migrating into the genital ridges at about E12.5. Spermatogonial stem cells self-renew throughout adulthood to generate sperm continuously, and a recent study

The Notch, Wnt and Hedgehog pathways regulate the self-renewal of diverse stem cells

Given the broad dependence of many embryonic and adult tissues on signaling through the Notch, Wnt and Hedgehog pathways, it is perhaps not surprising that these pathways regulate the self-renewal of many stem cells (Figure 2). Notch activation is critical to maintaining the self-renewal of stem cells in diverse stem cell niches from the worm germline [22] to mammalian hematopoietic stem cells [31]. The ability of Notch to promote self-renewal is probably due to its ability to inhibit

Polycomb family members: regulating self-renewal through chromatin structure

Polycomb family members assemble into large protein complexes that repress transcription by regulating chromatin structure [52]. Mel-18, Rae-28 and Bmi-1 are components of the polycomb maintenance complex. These genes play important roles in the regulation of stem cells, but there are profound differences in their effects on self-renewal. Mel-18-deficient mice exhibit increased fetal hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal, perhaps as a result of increased HoxB4 expression [53], which strongly

Regulating self-renewal by regulating developmental potential

Additional genes that are required for the self-renewal of adult neural stem cells are thought to negatively regulate differentiation. The orphan nuclear receptor Tlx is required for the maintenance of stem cells in the central nervous system postnatally but not during fetal development [62]. Tlx appears to promote neural stem cell self-renewal by repressing the expression of genes involved in astrocytic differentiation. In this regard, Tlx is similar to N-CoR, a co-repressor that interacts

Cell cycle regulation as a determinant of developmental changes in self-renewal

Cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitors regulate progression through G1 phase of the cell cycle and have been shown to regulate multiple kinds of stem cells. The early G1-phase regulator p18Ink4c impairs hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal such that p18Ink4c-deficient mice exhibit increased stem cell self-renewal and increased hematopoietic stem cell frequency [69]. The late G1 phase regulator p21cip1 also impairs hematopoietic stem cell proliferation, but the increased proliferation of p21

Conclusions

Recent insights into the regulation of stem cell self-renewal raise several fundamental questions. What are the mechanisms that confer the competence to undergo multilineage differentiation and to what extent are these mechanisms regulated at the level of chromatin structure? What is the relationship between the mechanisms that confer competence to undergo multilineage differentiation and the mechanisms that regulate differentiation itself? Is pluripotentiality maintained by several factors,

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We apologize to colleagues whose work could not be cited due to space constraints, particularly to the authors of important studies published before 2001. We thank AB Molofsky for helpful comments on the manuscript. AVM is the recipient of a training grant from the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. SJM is an Assistant Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

References (74)

  • H.Y. Lee et al.

    Instructive role of Wnt/β-catenin in sensory fate specification in neural crest stem cells

    Science

    (2004)
  • J.L. Lewis et al.

    Reiterated Wnt signaling during zebrafish neural crest development

    Development

    (2004)
  • T. Reya et al.

    A role for Wnt signalling in self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells

    Nature

    (2003)
  • R. Machold et al.

    Sonic hedgehog is required for progenitor cell maintenance in telencephalic stem cell niches

    Neuron

    (2003)
  • T. Kai et al.

    An empty Drosophila stem cell niche reactivates the proliferation of ectopic cells

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2003)
  • Y. Shi et al.

    Expression and function of orphan nuclear receptor TLX in adult neural stem cells

    Nature

    (2004)
  • A.A. Avilion et al.

    Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function

    Genes Dev

    (2003)
  • V. Graham et al.

    SOX2 functions to maintain neural progenitor identity

    Neuron

    (2003)
  • J. Kim et al.

    SOX10 maintains multipotency and inhibits neuronal differentiation of neural crest stem cells

    Neuron

    (2003)
  • L. Kan et al.

    Sox1 acts through multiple independent pathways to promote neurogenesis

    Dev Biol

    (2004)
  • H. Niwa et al.

    Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells

    Nat Genet

    (2000)
  • M. Boiani et al.

    Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: consequences for pluripotency

    Genes Dev

    (2002)
  • I. Chambers et al.

    Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells

    Cell

    (2003)
  • L.A. Hanna et al.

    Requirement for Foxd3 in maintaining pluripotent cells of the early mouse embryo

    Genes Dev

    (2002)
  • R. Kos et al.

    The winged-helix transcription factor FoxD3 is important for establishing the neural crest lineage and repressing melanogenesis in avian embryos

    Development

    (2001)
  • D. Xu et al.

    Forced expression of Genesis, a winged helix transcriptional repressor isolated from embryonic stem cells, blocks granulocytic differentiation of 32D myeloid cells

    Leukemia

    (1998)
  • H. Niwa et al.

    Self-renewal of pluripotent embryonic stem cells is mediated via activation of STAT3

    Genes Dev

    (1998)
  • J.A. Thomson et al.

    Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts

    Science

    (1998)
  • Daheron L, Opitz SL, Zaehres H, Lensch MW, Andrews PW, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Daley GQ: LIF/STAT3 signaling fails to...
  • C. Dani et al.

    Paracrine induction of stem cell renewal by LIF-deficient cells: a new ES cell regulatory pathway

    Dev Biol

    (1998)
  • J. Nichols et al.

    Physiological rationale for responsiveness of mouse embryonic stem cells to gp130 cytokines

    Development

    (2001)
  • Q.L. Ying et al.

    Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2003)
  • M. Tsuda et al.

    Conserved role of nanos proteins in germ cell development

    Science

    (2003)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    Nanos maintains germline stem cell self-renewal by preventing differentiation

    Science

    (2004)
  • S.L. Crittenden et al.

    A conserved RNA-binding protein controls germline stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Nature

    (2002)
  • D. Hansen et al.

    Control of the proliferation versus meiotic development decision in the C. elegans germline through regulation of GLD-1 protein accumulation

    Development

    (2004)
  • M. Koprunner et al.

    A zebrafish nanos-related gene is essential for the development of primordial germ cells

    Genes Dev

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text