Elsevier

Clinical Therapeutics

Volume 30, Issue 12, December 2008, Pages 2298-2313
Clinical Therapeutics

Comparative effects of 10-mg versus 80-mg Atorvastatin on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in patients with stable coronary artery disease: Results of the CAP (Comparative Atorvastatin Pleiotropic effects) study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.12.023Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: The major beneficial effect of statins— reducing the risk for coronary events—has primarily been ascribed to reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) but may in part be related to a direct antiinflammatory action (ie, decreased high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP] concentration).

Objectives: The objectives of this CAP (Comparative Atorvastatin Pleiotropic Effects) study were to compare the effects of low- versus high-dose atorvastatin on hs-CRP concentrations and to determine the relationship between changes in LDL-C and hs-CRP concentrations in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), low-grade inflammation, and normal lipoprotein concentrations.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study was conducted at 65 centers across Canada and Europe. Patients with documented CAD, low-grade inflammation (hs-CRP concentration, 1.5-15.0 mg/L), and a normal-range lipid profile (LDL-C concentration, 1.29-3.87 mmol/L [50-150 mg/dL]; triglyceride [TG] concentration, <4.56 mmol/L [<400 mg/dL]) were randomly assigned to receive 26-week double-blind treatment with atorvastatin 10 or 80 mg QD. Investigators were to aim for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) LDL-C target of <2.59 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL). The primary end point was the percentage change from baseline in hs-CRP, as measured at baseline and weeks 5, 13, and 26 using high-sensitivity, latex microparticle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay. Changes from baseline in LDL-C, as measured directly in serum at the same time points, were also calculated. The secondary efficacy variables included the percentage changes from baseline in lipid parameters (LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], total cholesterol [TC], TG, apolipoprotein B, non-HDL-C, and TC:HDL-C ratio) at 5, 13, and 26 weeks of treatment. Tolerability was assessed using physical examination, including vital sign measurement, and laboratory analyses.

Results: A total of 339 patients were enrolled (283 men, 56 women; mean age, 62.5 years; weight, 81.3 kg; 10-mg/d group, 170 patients; 80-mg/d group, 169). No significant differences in baseline demographic or clinical data were found between the 2 treatment arms. In the 10-mg group, hs-CRP was decreased by 25.0% at 5 weeks and remained stable thereafter (%Δ at week 26, -24.3%; P < 0.01). In the 80-mg group, hs-CRP was decreased by 36.4% at 5 weeks and continued to be decreased over the study period (%Δ, -57.1% at week 26; P < 0.001 vs baseline). At 5 weeks, LDL-C was decreased by 35.9% in the 10-mg group and by 52.7% in the 80-mg group (P < 0.001 between groups) and remained stable thereafter (%Δ at week 26, -34.8% and -51.3%, respectively; P < 0.001 between groups). The NCEP ATP III LDL-C target of <2.59 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) was reached in 77.1% of patients treated with atorvastatin 10 mg and 92.3% of those treated with 80 mg (P < 0.001). Dual targets of hs-CRP <2 mg/L and LDL-C <1.81 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL) were reached in a significantly greater proportion of patients in the 80-mg group compared with the 10-mg group (55.6% vs 13.5%; P < 0.001). The decrease in hs-CRP was largely independent of baseline LDL-C and change in LDL-C. Two serious adverse events were reported by the investigator as treatment related: acute hepatitis in the 10-mg group and intrahepatic cholestasis in the 80-mg group, in 2 patients with multiple comorbidities. Two deaths occurred during the study, both in the atorvastatin 80-mg group (1, myocardial infarction; 1, sudden death), neither of which was deemed treatment related by the investigator.

Conclusions: In these patients with documented CAD, evidence of low-grade inflammation, and normal range lipid profiles, the effects of atorvastatin on changes in hs-CRP were dose dependent, with the high dose (80 mg) being associated with significantly greater reductions in hs-CRP concentrations. Both doses were associated with a significant and progressive decline in hs-CRP largely independent of changes in LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG. Clinical Trials Identification Number: NCT00163202.

References (43)

  • SK Venugopal et al.

    Effect of C-reactive protein on vascular cells: Evidence for a proinflammatory, proatherogenic role

    Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens

    (2005)
  • I Jialal et al.

    C-reactive protein: Risk marker or mediator in atherothrombosis?

    Hypertension

    (2004)
  • C Baigent et al.

    Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: Prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins

    Lancet

    (2005)
  • JR Downs et al.

    Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: Results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study

    JAMA

    (1998)
  • PM Ridker et al.

    Measurement of C-reactive protein for the targeting of statin therapy in the primary prevention of acute coronary events

    N Engl J Med

    (2001)
  • FM Sacks et al.

    The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels

    N Engl J Med

    (1996)
  • PM Ridker et al.

    Long-term efton fects of pravastatin on plasma concentration of C-reactive protein

    Circulation

    (1999)
  • CP Cannon et al.

    Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • PM Ridker et al.

    C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • JA de Lemos et al.

    Early intensive vs a delayed conservative simvastatin strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Phase Z of the A to Z trial

    JAMA

    (2004)
  • SD Wiviott et al.

    A tale of two trials: A comparison of the post-acute coronary syndrome lipid-lowering trials A to Z and PROVE IT-TIMI 22

    Circulation

    (2006)
  • Cited by (74)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    The CAP Investigators are listed in the Acknowledgments.

    View full text