Methanogenic pathways of coal-bed gas in the Powder River Basin, United States: The geologic factor

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2008.02.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Coal-bed gas of the Tertiary Fort Union and Wasatch Formations in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Montana, U.S. was interpreted as microbial in origin by previous studies based on limited data on the gas and water composition and isotopes associated with the coal beds. To fully evaluate the microbial origin of the gas and mechanisms of methane generation, additional data for 165 gas and water samples from 7 different coal-bed methane-bearing coal-bed reservoirs were collected basinwide and correlated to the coal geology and stratigraphy.

The C1/(C2 + C3) ratio and vitrinite reflectance of coal and organic shale permitted differentiation between microbial gas and transitional thermogenic gas in the central part of the basin. Analyses of methane δ13C and δD, carbon dioxide δ13C, and water δD values indicate gas was generated primarily from microbial CO2 reduction, but with significant gas generated by microbial methyl-type fermentation (aceticlastic) in some areas of the basin. Microbial CO2 reduction occurs basinwide, but is generally dominant in Paleocene Fort Union Formation coals in the central part of the basin, whereas microbial methyl-type fermentation is common along the northwest and east margins. Isotopically light methane δ13C is distributed along the basin margins where δD is also depleted, indicating that both CO2-reduction and methyl-type fermentation pathways played major roles in gas generation, but gas from the latter pathway overprinted gas from the former pathway. More specifically, along the northwest basin margin gas generation by methyl-type fermentation may have been stimulated by late-stage infiltration of groundwater recharge from clinker areas, which flowed through highly fractured and faulted coal aquifers. Also, groundwater recharge controlled a change in gas composition in the shallow Eocene Wasatch Formation with the increase of nitrogen and decrease of methane composition of the coal-bed gas.

Other geologic factors, such as burial, thermal and maturation history, lateral and vertical continuity, and coalification of the coal beds, also played a significant role in controlling methanogenic pathways and provided new perspectives on gas evolution and emplacement. The early-stage gas produced by CO2 reduction has mixed with transitional thermogenic gas in the deeper, central parts of the Powder River Basin to form ‘old’ gas, whereas along the basin margins the overprint of gas from methyl-type fermentation represents ‘new’ gas. Thus, a clear understanding of these geologic factors is necessary to relate the microbiological, biogeochemical, and hydrological processes involved in the generation of coal-bed gas.

Introduction

Coal-bed methane (CBM), or coal-bed natural gas, is an unconventional gas that has become an emerging and important energy resource worldwide. It forms in both low and high-rank coals, mainly in the subbituminous and bituminous ranks, respectively. The Energy Information Administration (2005) reported that CBM accounted for 8% of U.S. natural gas production in 2003, following almost three decades of developmental history. Coal-bed methane production in the U.S also accounts for more than 70% of the world's (CBM) production, which is more than 59 Gm3. The remainder being produced (in descending order of production) by Australia, India, Canada, China, United Kingdom, Columbia, Russia, Ukraine, and Austria, (Flores, 2006). These countries have produced for about a decade, primarily from shallow to deep subsurface coal beds and secondarily from mineable coal beds in advance of coal mining or from abandoned coal mines. Historically, coal-mine methane has caused mine outbursts or explosions in many countries, especially China, resulting in thousands of lost lives (Flores, 1998). Methane emanating from underground and from surface coal mines is also a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions.

Gas produced from bituminous and subbituminous coals has traditionally been grouped as either thermogenic, microbial, or a mixture based on the main process involved in its generation — that is, by temperature and microbial activity, respectively. Understanding the generation of the gas requires some knowledge of the formation of coal and the processes of peatification and coalification. Coal is a combustible rock composed of about 50% or more organic matter by weight or 70% by volume (Schopf, 1956). This ‘hard metamorphosed rock’ of organic matter was originally accumulated by the degradation, decomposition, and alteration of plant remains forming peat in tropical and temperate swamps and/or bogs (Taylor et al., 1998). The warmer temperatures typical of peat swamp and/or bog settings promote higher average plant growth and subsequent degradation as well as more intensive microbial activity accompanied by quicker chemical decomposition. The peatification process includes microbial and chemical changes of the organic matter that forms hydrogen-rich humic substances; these changes are influenced by oxygen supply, peat temperature, and alkaline environments. Carbon content of the peat increases with depth of the peatigenic layer particularly in the form of cellulose and hemicellulose oxygen-rich substances that are decomposed microbiologically, resulting in enriched carbon-rich lignin and humic acids (Taylor et al., 1998). Increased compression of peat caused by autocompaction and compaction by burial of overlying sediments during substrate subsidence results in decreased moisture content accompanied by increased carbon content (dry-ash-free basis) and absence of free cellulose.

Coalification is the transformation of peat at depths via chemical and physical alterations. Geologic time, combined with increasing temperature and pressure, progressively converts the organic matter deposit into higher rank such as lignite, subbituminous, bituminous, and anthracite coal. During coalification from low- to high-rank coals, diagenesis, catagenesis, and metagenesis increase calorific value and fixed carbon, decrease volatile matter and moisture content, and generate natural gas (Tissot and Welte, 1984). Organic matter becomes progressively more aromatic with expulsion of aliphatic components through generation of gases and liquids; condensation of solid residual humic products also takes place (Taylor et al., 1998, Faiz, 2004). In addition, depending on the parent organic substance, the coalification process is known to generate condensate and oil (Boreham and Powell, 1993, Mukhopadhyay and Hatcher, 1993).

Early- and late-stage microbial and thermogenic gases and liquids, such as CH4, C2H6, CO2, and H2O as well as higher hydrocarbon gases (e.g. ethane, propane, butane) and liquid hydrocarbons, are produced during peatification and coalification (Rice, 1993, Faiz, 2004). Extrapolation of degassing curves from long-term experimental pyrolysis of peats and coals by van Heek et al. (1971) indicated that, during early coalification, water is first lost at 20–50 °C, followed by methane from residual lignin at 30–70 °C, then by carbon dioxide at 70–100 °C, and lastly by large quantities of methane at 160–200 °C. Significant volumes (100–300 cm3/g of coal) of methane are generated from coals (e.g. bituminous) during coalification (Juntgen and Karweil, 1966, Rice, 1993) but most of the early-stage microbial and thermogenic gas is lost, when not sealed and trapped, by migration into surrounding reservoirs during burial, as well as by escape into the atmosphere during uplift and erosion of the basinal sedimentary rocks. Thus, deformation and erosion as well as the geology and stratigraphy of the coal-bed reservoirs and surrounding rock units play a major role in the preservation and accumulation of early-stage gases. More importantly, these geologic events play a key role in the timing of the generation, migration, and accumulation of late-stage gases such as microbial gas (Rice and Flores, 1990, Rice and Flores, 1991, Rice, 1993, Flores, 2004).

The purposes of this paper are to: (1) test the presumptive microbial origin of gas in subbituminous coal in the Powder River Basin, which is a prolific coal-bed gas producer (Fig. 1); (2) compare results of our work to previous investigations by Rice, 1993, Gorody, 1999; (3) expand the work on isotopic composition and fractionation of deuterium (D) between water and methane (CH4) and of carbon (C) between carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane in order to differentiate the origins and mixtures of microbial and thermogenic gases; and (4) determine the role of coal geology and stratigraphy on the origin and methanogenic pathways of coal-bed gas generation, evolution, and emplacement.

Section snippets

Methodology

One-hundred sixty-five gas and water samples were collected from CBM-producing wells, ranging from 51 to 700 m in depth, throughout the Powder River Basin, with the bulk of the samples from Wyoming because of the distribution of active CBM development (Fig. 1). Several wells were resampled for quality control. Gas samples were analyzed for chemical composition at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) geochemistry laboratory in Denver, Colorado. Analysis of the carbon and hydrogen isotope ratios of

Coal geology of the Powder River Basin

The Powder River Basin is structurally asymmetrical with the basin axis near the west edge; rocks on the west flank dip as much as 25° eastward and rocks on the east flank dip as much as 5° westward (Fig. 1). It is bounded by the Bighorn Mountains to the west, Casper Arch and Laramie Mountains to the south, and Black Hills to the east. The basin contains coal beds in both the Paleocene Fort Union Formation and the Eocene Wasatch Formation (Fig. 2) that are as much as 75 m thick. More than

Stratigraphy of CBM coal-bed reservoirs in the Fort Union and Wasatch Formations

Gas and water samples were collected from three CBM coal-bed reservoirs in the Wyodak–Anderson coal zone of the Fort Union Formation, two CBM coal-bed reservoirs below this coal zone, and two CBM coal-bed reservoirs from the Wasatch Formation (Fig. 2). The Wyodak–Anderson coal zone or coal-bed reservoirs (using USGS nomenclature) include, from bottom to top, Canyon, Anderson, and Smith beds (these are called Wyodak, Big George, and Smith coal beds by gas operators). These coal beds merge in the

Thermal maturation and burial history of the CBM coal-bed reservoirs

Thermal maturation of CBM reservoirs in the Powder River Basin is determined by vitrinite (huminite) reflectance (Ro in %), which is measured from woody plant material or vitrinite/huminite macerals in coal and in organic-rich shale or mudstone. This measurement is directly related to the degree of metamorphism of the organic material; thus, it can be used to estimate thermal maturity and coal rank. Coal-bed reservoirs in the Fort Union Formation range from subbituminous C at shallow depths and

Gas composition of CBM coal-bed reservoirs

Previous studies of gas composition of coal beds in the Powder River Basin were based on limited data collected from coal drill holes, water wells, and CBM production wells at depths of 120–450 m (Boreck and Weaver, 1984, Rice and Flores, 1990, Rice and Flores, 1991, Rice, 1993). The advent of CBM development in the basin has made available many more desorption tests of coal cores and production wells for water and gas composition analyses. Our study included 165 gas and water samples collected

Previous studies

Previous studies of the origin of gas in coal beds in the Powder River Basin relied on a limited data, which collected gas from coal in shallow CBM production wells along the east margin (Rice, 1993, Gorody, 1999). Rice (1993) reported methane δ13C values from about − 54 to − 57‰ and methane δD values from − 307 to − 333‰ based on five samples (Fig. 10), and indicated that both isotopic compositions are uniform across the basin. Gorody (1999) reported methane δ13C values from about − 55 to − 63‰ and

Discussion of methanogenic pathways and gas evolution as related to timing of geologic events in the Powder River Basin

Subsurface microbes living in rocks from the surface to the 900-m depth accounts for as much as 50% of the earth's total biomass; this upper layer is an important habitat for microbial growth and methane generation (Gold, 1992, Cragg et al., 1996, Whitman et al., 1998, Krumholz, 2000). Microbially-mediated generation of methane has been shown to occur in Tertiary and Upper Cretaceous rocks in the North Sea based on trends in methane δ13C with depth (Hunt, 1996). Hunt (1996) used methane δ13C to

Conclusions

Previous studies established the microbial origin of the gas and methanogenic pathways in coals and fluvial channel sandstones of the Paleocene Fort Union Formation in the Powder River Basin. Results of our work generally agree with the conclusions of these previous studies, but the addition of considerably more analytical data on the composition and isotopes of the gases and co-produced water from samples collected basinwide from more varied CBM coal reservoirs has provided more detailed

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the following gas operators in the Powder River Basin for participating in the study: Devon Energy Production Company LP, Kennedy Oil, Fidelity Exploration and Production Company, Huber JM Corporation, Jims Water Service Incorporated, Lance Oil and Gas Company, M&M Ranch Acquisition Company LLC, McCartney Engineering LLC, Pennaco Energy Incorporated, Pinnacle Gas Resources Incorporated, PRB Oil and Gas Incorporated, Primary Natural Resources Incorporated, Pure Petroleum LLC,

References (77)

  • WhiticarM.J.

    Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of microbial formation and oxidation of methane

    Chemical Geology

    (1999)
  • WhiticarM.J. et al.

    Biogenic methane formation in marine and freshwater environments: CO2 reduction vs. acetate fermentation — isotope evidence

    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

    (1986)
  • BartosT.T. et al.

    Water quality and environment isotopic analyses of ground-water samples collected from Wasatch and Fort Union Formations in areas of coalbed methane development: implications to recharge and ground-water flow, eastern Powder River Basin, Wyoming

  • BoreckD.L. et al.

    Coalbed methane study of the Anderson coal deposit, Johnson County, Wyoming — a preliminary report

  • BorehamC.J. et al.

    Petroleum source rock potential of coal and associated sediments: qualitative and quantitative aspects

  • BrysonR.P.

    The Coalwood coal field, Powder River County, Montana

    U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin

    (1952)
  • CulbertsonW.C. et al.

    Coal in the Wasatch Formation, northwest part of the Powder River Basin near Sheridan, Sheridan County, Wyoming

  • CulbertsonW.C. et al.

    Preliminary diagrams showing correlation of coal beds in the Fort Union and Wasatch Formations across the northern Powder River Basin, northeastern Wyoming and southeastern Montana

  • DaiJ. et al.

    Composition, carbon isotope characteristics and the origin of coal-bed gases in China and their implications

    Scientia Sinica Series B0

    (1987)
  • DanielsL. et al.

    Origin of hydrogen in methane produced by Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum

    Journal of Bacteriology

    (1980)
  • DensonN.M. et al.

    Summary of mineralogic and lithologic characteristics of Tertiary sedimentary rocks in the Middle Rocky Mountains and the northern Great Plains, in Geological Survey Research 1971

    U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper

    (1971)
  • DobbinC.E. et al.

    The Gillette coal field, northeastern Wyoming

    U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin

    (1928)
  • EllisM.S. et al.

    Sheridan coalfield, Powder River Basin: geology, coal quality, and coal resources

  • Energy Information Administration

    Coalbed methane reserves and production

    (2005)
  • FaizM.

    Microbial influences on coal seam gas reservoirs — a review

  • FaizM. et al.

    Significance of microbial activity in Australian coal bed methane reservoirs — a review

    Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology

    (2006)
  • FloresR.M.

    Restored stratigraphic cross sections and coal correlations in the Tongue River Member of the Fort Union Formation, Powder River area, Montana

  • FloresR.M.

    Fluvial coal setting of the Tongue River Member of the Fort Union Formation in the Powder River–Clear Creek area, Wyoming

  • FloresR.M.

    Coal deposition in fluvial paleoenvironments of the Paleocene Tongue River Member of the Fort Union Formation, Powder River area, Powder River Basin, Wyoming and Montana

  • FloresR.M.

    Basin facies analysis of coal-rich Tertiary fluvial deposits, northern Powder River Basin, Montana and Wyoming

  • FloresR.M.

    Styles of coal deposition in Tertiary alluvial deposits, Powder River Basin, Montana and Wyoming

  • FloresR.M.

    Coalbed methane in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming and Montana: an assessment of the Tertiary–Upper Cretaceous coalbed methane Total Petroleum System

  • FloresR.M.

    Coalbed methane: alternative energy for power generation

  • FloresR.M. et al.

    Fort Union coal in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming and Montana: a synthesis

  • FloresR.M. et al.

    Framework geology of the Fort Union coal in the Powder River Basin

  • FloresR.M. et al.

    CBNG development: confusing coal stratigraphy and gas production in the Powder River Basin

  • FloresR.M. et al.

    Methanogenic pathways in the Powder River Basin: the geologic factor

  • GoldT.

    The deep, hot biosphere

    Proceedings National Academy of Science

    (1992)
  • Cited by (245)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text