Expression profiling and individualisation of treatment for ovarian cancer
Introduction
Ovarian cancer is the fourth commonest cause of cancer-related death in women. The majority of patients present with advanced disease, with an overall five-year survival rate of approximately 30–40% following debulking surgery, initial platinum-based chemotherapy and further chemotherapy at relapse [1, 2]. However, individual patients within this group demonstrate wide variations in response to treatment and in their overall survival (OS), which can range from a few months to several years.
One challenge in the management of these patients is, therefore, to accurately identify those most likely to benefit from particular therapies, so that patients unlikely to benefit can be spared the toxicity and cost of those interventions. Until recently, such attempts at individualising therapy were based on the measurement of, at most, a handful of molecular markers, none of which has yet achieved sufficient significance to be adopted into clinical practice [3].
The recent advent of microarray-based profiling technologies, however, has provided an opportunity to simultaneously examine the relationship between thousands of genes and clinical phenotypes. Using this approach, several groups have reported the ability to identify biologically and prognostically distinct tumour subgroups in a number of cancers. In the case of early breast cancer, a signature associated with metastasis-free survival has been identified, validated in an independent dataset, and is currently the subject of a multi-centre randomised clinical trial (MINDACT) to establish its utility in selecting patients for adjuvant chemotherapy in clinical practice [4, 5].
In this review, we examine attempts to apply microarray-based expression profiling to individualisation of therapy in ovarian cancer, focusing on the identification of signatures associated with the outcome of debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy and survival.
Section snippets
Surgical outcome
The majority of patients with ovarian cancer initially undergo surgery consisting of hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy, omentectomy and an attempt to resect all visible tumour deposits on peritoneal surfaces. This is referred to as debulking surgery. Studies have demonstrated an improved outcome in patients who have been optimally debulked, defined as surgery resulting in residual tumour masses less than 1–2 cm in maximum diameter, relative to patients with larger residual tumour
Response to chemotherapy
Following debulking surgery, patients with advanced ovarian cancer generally receive platinum-based chemotherapy, with response rates of 70–80% [2]. However, a subset of 20–30% of patients either progress during chemotherapy, or relapse within six months of treatment, and are referred to as platinum-refractory/resistant tumours [2]. These tumours have low response rates to re-challenge with platinum and other second-line agents, and have a poor prognosis. A number of profiling studies have
Progression-free and overall survival
Response to chemotherapy is an important endpoint that correlates with immediate clinical benefit; however, it has only a limited correlation with outcome measures such as the PFI and OS. This is because the PFI and OS are also determined by other factors such as the metastatic potential and growth rate of tumours. Three studies have attempted to identify gene expression patterns associated with survival in ovarian cancer [13, 14, 15•].
Hartmann et al. [13] used custom cDNA microarrays to
Conclusions
A number of studies have evaluated the potential for individualisation of treatment in ovarian cancer by identifying gene expression signatures using microarrays to predict outcomes following surgery and chemotherapy. The major criticisms of current studies relate to their small sample size, patient heterogeneity and lack of internal and external validation. These problems have also been exacerbated by the use of a number of different microarray platforms, statistical methods and outcome
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Kidani Trust, Sir John Egan Trust and Cancer Research UK for their support.
References (16)
- et al.
Prediction of chemotherapeutic response in ovarian cancer with DNA microarray expression profiling
Cancer Genet Cytogenet
(2004) - et al.
Cancer statistics, 2001
CA Cancer J Clin
(2001) - ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2001....
- et al.
Tight junction proteins claudin-3 and claudin-4 are frequently overexpressed in ovarian cancer but not in ovarian cystadenomas
Clin Cancer Res
(2003) - et al.
A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer
N Engl J Med
(2002) - et al.
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
Nature
(2002) - et al.
Does aggressive surgery only benefit patients with less advanced ovarian cancer? Results from an international comparison within the SCOTROC-1 trial
J Clin Oncol
(2005) - et al.
Prediction of optimal versus suboptimal cytoreduction of advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer with the use of microarrays
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2004)
Cited by (15)
RNAi screening of the kinome identifies modulators of cisplatin response in ovarian cancer cells
2010, Gynecologic OncologyCitation Excerpt :Those tumors that respond initially and later recur are considered to acquire resistance as a result of the selection of drug-resistant clones during treatment with chemotherapy [4]. Although several studies have been performed to identify gene signatures associated with resistance to chemotherapy [5–9], no consistent profile has emerged, suggesting that some of the genes in these signatures may be secondary phenomena rather than the primary processes associated with chemoresistance. Therefore, the development of a more effective chemotherapy treatment by identifying genes involved in modulating drug responses would be instrumental in the ability to fight this disease.
Genomic Applications in Ovarian Cancer
2018, Genomic Applications in Pathology: Second Edition 2019Surface markers of cancer stem-like cells of ovarian cancer and their clinical relevance
2017, Wspolczesna OnkologiaIdentification of abrogated pathways in fallopian tube epithelium from BRCA1 mutation carriers
2011, Journal of PathologyPredictive biology of ovarian cancer
2011, Gynaecological Cancers: Biology and Therapeutics