Expression profiling and individualisation of treatment for ovarian cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2006.02.007Get rights and content

Ovarian cancer is the commonest cause of gynaecological cancer-related mortality. Patients with this disease generally undergo surgery followed by platinum-taxane chemotherapy, with additional chemotherapy at relapse. Although the prognosis for patients with advanced cancer is poor — a five-year survival of only 30–40% — there is a wide range of outcomes for individual patients. To date, clinico-pathological variables such as age, stage, grade, histology, debulking status and response to chemotherapy continue to provide the basis on which treatment decisions are made for individual patients. Immunohistochemical markers and information on p53 mutation status have been extensively evaluated in ovarian cancer, but have not yet been shown to be sufficiently informative to influence clinical decisions on a routine basis. The recent advent of expression profiling has provided a new impetus to identifying clinically useful prognostic markers. The ambition of personalised medicine through microarray-based profiling appears to be realistic, but further studies on large uniform cohorts are needed before this potential is fully realised.

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is the fourth commonest cause of cancer-related death in women. The majority of patients present with advanced disease, with an overall five-year survival rate of approximately 30–40% following debulking surgery, initial platinum-based chemotherapy and further chemotherapy at relapse [1, 2]. However, individual patients within this group demonstrate wide variations in response to treatment and in their overall survival (OS), which can range from a few months to several years.

One challenge in the management of these patients is, therefore, to accurately identify those most likely to benefit from particular therapies, so that patients unlikely to benefit can be spared the toxicity and cost of those interventions. Until recently, such attempts at individualising therapy were based on the measurement of, at most, a handful of molecular markers, none of which has yet achieved sufficient significance to be adopted into clinical practice [3].

The recent advent of microarray-based profiling technologies, however, has provided an opportunity to simultaneously examine the relationship between thousands of genes and clinical phenotypes. Using this approach, several groups have reported the ability to identify biologically and prognostically distinct tumour subgroups in a number of cancers. In the case of early breast cancer, a signature associated with metastasis-free survival has been identified, validated in an independent dataset, and is currently the subject of a multi-centre randomised clinical trial (MINDACT) to establish its utility in selecting patients for adjuvant chemotherapy in clinical practice [4, 5].

In this review, we examine attempts to apply microarray-based expression profiling to individualisation of therapy in ovarian cancer, focusing on the identification of signatures associated with the outcome of debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy and survival.

Section snippets

Surgical outcome

The majority of patients with ovarian cancer initially undergo surgery consisting of hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy, omentectomy and an attempt to resect all visible tumour deposits on peritoneal surfaces. This is referred to as debulking surgery. Studies have demonstrated an improved outcome in patients who have been optimally debulked, defined as surgery resulting in residual tumour masses less than 1–2 cm in maximum diameter, relative to patients with larger residual tumour

Response to chemotherapy

Following debulking surgery, patients with advanced ovarian cancer generally receive platinum-based chemotherapy, with response rates of 70–80% [2]. However, a subset of 20–30% of patients either progress during chemotherapy, or relapse within six months of treatment, and are referred to as platinum-refractory/resistant tumours [2]. These tumours have low response rates to re-challenge with platinum and other second-line agents, and have a poor prognosis. A number of profiling studies have

Progression-free and overall survival

Response to chemotherapy is an important endpoint that correlates with immediate clinical benefit; however, it has only a limited correlation with outcome measures such as the PFI and OS. This is because the PFI and OS are also determined by other factors such as the metastatic potential and growth rate of tumours. Three studies have attempted to identify gene expression patterns associated with survival in ovarian cancer [13, 14, 15•].

Hartmann et al. [13] used custom cDNA microarrays to

Conclusions

A number of studies have evaluated the potential for individualisation of treatment in ovarian cancer by identifying gene expression signatures using microarrays to predict outcomes following surgery and chemotherapy. The major criticisms of current studies relate to their small sample size, patient heterogeneity and lack of internal and external validation. These problems have also been exacerbated by the use of a number of different microarray platforms, statistical methods and outcome

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Kidani Trust, Sir John Egan Trust and Cancer Research UK for their support.

References (16)

  • Z.E. Selvanayagam et al.

    Prediction of chemotherapeutic response in ovarian cancer with DNA microarray expression profiling

    Cancer Genet Cytogenet

    (2004)
  • R.T. Greenlee et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2001

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2001)
  • ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2001....
  • L.B. Rangel et al.

    Tight junction proteins claudin-3 and claudin-4 are frequently overexpressed in ovarian cancer but not in ovarian cystadenomas

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2003)
  • M.J. van de Vijver et al.

    A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • L.J. van ’t Veer et al.

    Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer

    Nature

    (2002)
  • S.C. Crawford et al.

    Does aggressive surgery only benefit patients with less advanced ovarian cancer? Results from an international comparison within the SCOTROC-1 trial

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • A. Berchuck et al.

    Prediction of optimal versus suboptimal cytoreduction of advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer with the use of microarrays

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2004)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (15)

  • RNAi screening of the kinome identifies modulators of cisplatin response in ovarian cancer cells

    2010, Gynecologic Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Those tumors that respond initially and later recur are considered to acquire resistance as a result of the selection of drug-resistant clones during treatment with chemotherapy [4]. Although several studies have been performed to identify gene signatures associated with resistance to chemotherapy [5–9], no consistent profile has emerged, suggesting that some of the genes in these signatures may be secondary phenomena rather than the primary processes associated with chemoresistance. Therefore, the development of a more effective chemotherapy treatment by identifying genes involved in modulating drug responses would be instrumental in the ability to fight this disease.

  • Genomic Applications in Ovarian Cancer

    2018, Genomic Applications in Pathology: Second Edition 2019
  • Predictive biology of ovarian cancer

    2011, Gynaecological Cancers: Biology and Therapeutics
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text