Animal models of addiction
On habits and addiction: an associative analysis of compulsive drug seeking

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddmod.2009.07.004Get rights and content

The processes that underlie the pathological pursuit of drugs in addiction and that support the transition from casual drug taking to their compulsive pursuit have recently been proposed to reflect the interaction of two action control processes that mediate the goal-directed and habitual control of actions for natural rewards. Here we describe the evidence for these learning processes, their associate structure and the motivational mechanisms through which their operation is translated into performance. Finally, we describe the potential changes in the interaction between habitual and goal-directed processes induced by drug addiction that subserve compulsive drug pursuit; that is the increase in habit learning and reduction in the regulation of habits induced by changes in the circuitry that mediates goal-directed action.

Section editors:

Nigel Maidment and Niall Murphy – Hatos Center for Neuropharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

M. Foster Olive – Center for Drug and Alcohol Programs, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

Section snippets

What is habit learning?

In the field of learning theory, the term habit tends to be reserved for the product of stimulus–response learning [5, 6]. Consider an instrumental conditioning experiment in which a hungry rat is rewarded with food pellets for pressing a lever. In general, theories of stimulus–response learning assume that these food pellet deliveries strengthen, or reinforce, an association between prevailing stimuli (e.g. the experimental context or other more punctate stimuli such as the sight of the lever)

Tests of goal-directed action selection

Some time ago, on the basis of analyses of goal-directed behavior derived from human action theory (e.g. [8]), Dickinson and Balleine [9] argued that, to be classified as goal-directed, the performance of an action must be shown to depend on two things: (i) the causal relationship between that action and its outcome (i.e. its action–outcome contingency) and (ii) the current motivational value of that outcome. It turns out that under certain training conditions instrumental lever pressing in

Pavlovian–instrumental interactions

As with the contingency degradation effect, the outcome-selectivity of outcome devaluation allows one to rule out alternative interpretations of the sensitivity of instrumental performance to the devaluation manipulation. To understand why this is the case, it is important to consider another role that contextual cues could play in instrumental conditioning (i.e. apart from their putative role as discriminative, or eliciting, stimuli in habit learning). In a typical instrumental conditioning

Habit formation

As discussed above, the sensitivity of instrumental performance to manipulations of outcome value and action–outcome contingency degradation indicates that rats can apply a goal-directed strategy to control the performance of instrumental actions. Although this might be taken to imply that it is the R–O and not the S–R learning process that dominates instrumental learning, this is not always the case. Certain types of training are known to generate performance that is relatively insensitive to

Modeling compulsive drug seeking in animals

It is instructive at this point to reconsider the habit learning account of drug addiction in light of the behavioral findings described above. Indeed, on the basis of these findings, it seems improbable that drugs produce compulsive behavior merely by facilitating the rate of habit formation. Although this might address some of the inflexibility of drug-seeking behavior, given what we know about the habitual control of action selection in both rodents and humans this position should anticipate

Conclusion

During the development of addiction the pursuit of drugs of abuse becomes progressively less goal-directed and progressively more habitual coming under the control of internal and external states and stimuli. Understandably, therefore, recent theory and research on addiction has begun to focus on the habit learning process and its behavioral and neural bases. It is important, however, to distinguish habitual drug seeking from other forms of habitual behavior. Under normal conditions, habit

References (59)

  • A. Redish

    A unified framework for addiction: vulnerabilities in the decision process

    Behav. Brain Sci.

    (2008)
  • S. Tiffany

    What can dependence theories tell us about assessing the emergence of tobacco dependence?

    Addiction

    (2004)
  • A. Dickinson

    Actions and habits: the development of behavioural autonomy

    Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B

    (1985)
  • A. Dickinson

    Instrumental conditioning

  • C.D. Adams et al.

    Instrumental responding following reinforcer devaluation

    Q. J. Exp. Psychol.

    (1981)
  • M. Frese et al.

    Goal Directed Behavior: The Concept of Action in Psychology

    (1985)
  • A. Dickinson et al.

    Actions and responses: the dual psychology of behaviour

  • L.J. Hammond

    The effect of contingency upon appetitive conditioning of free operant behavior

    J. Exp. Anal. Behav.

    (1980)
  • J. Davis et al.

    Differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO): a yoked-control comparison

    J. Exp. Anal. Behav.

    (1971)
  • B.W. Balleine

    Incentive processes in instrumental conditioning

  • A. Dickinson et al.

    Motivational control of goal-directed action

    Anim. Learn. Behav.

    (1994)
  • B.W. Balleine et al.

    The role of incentive learning in instrumental outcome revaluation by specific satiety

    Anim. Learn. Behav.

    (1998)
  • B.W. Balleine

    Taste, disgust and value: taste aversion learning and outcome encoding in instrumental conditioning

  • B.W. Balleine et al.

    Still at the choice point: action selection and initiation in instrumental conditioning

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2007)
  • R.A. Rescorla

    Response–outcome versus outcome–response associations in instrumental learning

    Anim. Learn. Behav.

    (1992)
  • R.A. Rescorla et al.

    Two-process learning theory: relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1967)
  • M.A. Trapold et al.

    The second learning process in instrumental conditioning

  • L.H. Corbit

    The role of the nucleus accumbens in instrumental conditioning: evidence of a functional dissociation between accumbens core and shell

    J. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • A. Dickinson

    Bidirectional instrumental conditioning

    Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B

    (1996)
  • Cited by (105)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text