Brief report
The ratio of adiponectin to homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance is a powerful index of each component of metabolic syndrome in an aged Japanese population: Results from the KING Study,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.02.029Get rights and content

Abstract

We evaluated the ratio of adiponectin level to homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (A/H ratio) as a risk marker for metabolic syndrome (MetS) and each of its components. The A/H ratio may prove to be a powerful index for evaluation of risk for MetS and each of its components.

Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by a clustering of metabolic abnormalities, including central obesity, insulin resistance (IR), dyslipidemia, and hypertension, and it has been identified as a common precursor to the development of cardiovascular disease [1]. The prevalence of MetS is increasing in Japan as a result of changes in diet and physical activity during recent decades [2]. There is therefore an urgent need to establish an appropriate and sensitive screening marker to identify individuals at high risk for the development of MetS and thereby to prevent a further increase in its incidence.

Insulin resistance with compensatory hyperinsulinemia is thought to play a prominent role in MetS [3]. Adiponectin is thought to contribute to the regulation of insulin sensitivity [4], [5]. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) provides a useful index of IR in epidemiological studies [6], [7]. Adiponectin and HOMA thus represent two different aspects of IR with opposite relations to this condition. The combination of these two markers in the form of the ratio of the serum adiponectin concentration to HOMA-IR (A/H ratio) would potentiate this difference and might therefore be expected to be more sensitive than either parameter alone for evaluation of MetS risk. We have now examined this hypothesis in a population-based cross-sectional study of aged Japanese.

Section snippets

Study participants

The Kita-Nagoya Genomic Epidemiology (KING) Study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00262691) is a prospective population-based observational survey of aged Japanese [8], [9]. A total of 3298 individuals (1456 men and 1842 women) participated in this study. All participants provided written informed consent.

Clinical data

Body mass index (BMI in kg/m2), waist circumference, and blood pressure (BP) in the seated position were also measured.

Laboratory data

Venous blood samples (14 ml) were obtained from participants in the

Characteristics of subjects

Characteristics of the study subjects are shown in Table 1. The serum adiponectin concentration in men was significantly lower than that in women [geometric mean (2.5–97.5 percentile), 8.8 (3.3–23.3) vs. 12.9 (4.7–35.2) μg/ml; P < 0.001]. The A/H ratio in men was also lower than that in women [9.8 (1.0–96.3) vs. 13.4 (1.6–114.6); P < 0.001].

Relation of HOMA-IR, adiponectin level, or the A/H ratio to clinical or laboratory parameters

We first examined the age-adjusted relation of HOMA-IR, serum adiponectin concentration, or the A/H ratio to clinical or laboratory parameters in men and women (

Discussion

We have found that the A/H ratio was highly associated with MetS and MetS components. The A/H ratio was thus shown to be a powerful index of MetS, each component of MetS, or the absence of MetS components in the community-based KING Study, and it may prove to be more efficient than serum adiponectin level alone in identifying individuals at high or low risk for development of MetS. Measurement of FPG, IRI, and adiponectin may thus provide an excellent marker for MetS and its components.

Serum

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank the study participants as well as Masakazu Kobayashi, Ken Harada, Takashi Yamada, Kazumasa Unno, Hiroki Kataoka, Hidehito Funahashi, Kousuke Arai, Yasutsugu Morimoto, Mayo Sukegawa, and especially Takao Nishizawa for their assistance.

References (11)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research of Category (A) and (B) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17209021, 21390209) to M.Y.

☆☆

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: KING Study, NCT00262691; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00262691.

View full text