Trends in injection drug use behaviors over 10 years among street youth

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.12.025Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the temporal trends of initiation into injection drug use, current injection, and recent receptive sharing of injection paraphernalia among street youth.

Design

Data from two cohort studies conducted between 1995 and 2005 were combined.

Methods

Recruitment was done on an ongoing basis. Interviews were performed semi-annually. Overall and annual drug injection incidence rates were calculated with the person-time method. Poisson regression was used to assess the predictive power of calendar year on incidence rate. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to assess linear trends in current injection among street youth and in recent receptive sharing of syringe and other injection paraphernalia among current injection drug users.

Results

By 31 March 2005, 1633 subjects had completed 8875 questionnaires. Most subjects were born in Canada (94%), their mean age at entry was 20 years, 68% were boys and almost half (44%) had injected drugs before recruitment. Among 778 never injectors at entry, 130 subjects initiated injection in 1898 person-years of follow-up (incidence rate: 6.8 per 100 person-years). When controlling for age, calendar year was not a significant predictor of incidence rate. Prevalence of current injection was stable (around 30%). Odds of both sharing behaviors decreased by approximately 10% per year.

Conclusions

In addition to injection paraphernalia sharing reduction efforts, interventions aimed at preventing initiation into injection drug use among high-risk youth are needed.

Introduction

All around the world, numerous uncontrolled epidemics of HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are related to injection drug use (Roy et al., 2002, NIH CDCS, 2002, UNAIDS/WHO, 2005). Since the vast majority of initiations into drug injection occur during late adolescence and early adulthood (WHO ICG, 1994), and sharing of drug injection equipment is common among young new injection drug users (IDUs) (Kipke et al., 1996, Fennema et al., 1997, Kral et al., 2000, Mullen and Barry, 2001, Smyth et al., 2001, Thorpe et al., 2001, Roy et al., 2001, Montgomery et al., 2002, Novelli et al., 2005), these epidemics affect young people in particular.

Despite this situation, very little information is available on temporal trends of drug injection and sharing of injection paraphernalia in young vulnerable populations. In Amsterdam, recent injection was found to be more common among drug users aged 30 years old or less recruited into a cohort study between 1985 and 1989 than among those recruited into a cross-sectional study in 1998 (77% versus 56%) (Welp et al., 2002). The authors concluded that this trend could reflect a reduction in the rate of initiation into injection among young drug users in Amsterdam. However, they also acknowledged that the two samples were not fully comparable due to different recruitment strategies. Other analyses based on the Amsterdam cohort study showed no significant changes between 1986 and 1995 in the borrowing of used needles among IDU under 26 years of age entering the cohort (Fennema et al., 1996).

In North America, street youth form a population in which injection drug use is highly prevalent. According to various studies, between 30% (Clatts et al., 1998) and 40% (Kral et al., 1997, Pfeifer and Oliver, 1997, Gleghorn et al., 1998) of street youth in the United States have injected drugs at least once. In Canada, these proportions range from 17% (DeMatteo et al., 1999) to approximately 40% (Ochnio et al., 2001, Roy et al., 2006a). Canadian public health authorities are very concerned about these figures, particularly in major cities where injection drug use is a significant cause of HIV and HCV transmission (Patrick et al., 2001, Hankins et al., 2002). In Montréal, where the present studies were conducted, HIV and HCV infection incidence rates are estimated to be 4 per 100 person-years and 27 per 100 person-years respectively among IDUs attending needle exchange programs (Parent et al., 2006, Roy et al., 2006b).

Using data from two prospective cohort studies of street youth, we conducted analyses to determine the temporal trends of injection drug use in terms of initiation and current injection. We also examined temporal trends in recent receptive sharing of syringe and other injection paraphernalia among youth injecting drugs. The present analyses focus on the predictive effect of calendar year on each behavior.

Section snippets

Methods

Both studies were conducted in Montréal, Canada. They focussed on HIV and HCV infections and related risk behaviors among street youth. Recruitment for the first cohort took place between January 1995 and September 2000; semi-annual follow-up interviews were conducted until March 2001. Recruitment for the second cohort started in July 2001 and ended in June 2004; semi-annual follow-up through 31 March 2005 was used for the analyses presented here.

Study population

A total of 1633 subjects were recruited: 47% participated in the first cohort only (n = 773), 39% in the second only (n = 632), and 14% in both (n = 228). They had completed 8875 questionnaires by 31 March 2005. Most subjects were born in Canada (94%), their mean age at entry was 20 years and 68% were boys. At recruitment, 98% of the subjects had ever been homeless and their first episode took place 4.3 years before on average. Main sources of income in the preceding 6 months were illegal activities

Discussion

More than 10 years of data collection on 1633 street youth's drug use behaviors allowed us to study temporal changes in incidence of injection, current injection, and receptive sharing of injection paraphernalia. We found that initiation and current injection were stable, while receptive sharing decreased with time.

Our findings that the incidence rate of injection drug use and the proportion of current injectors among street youth are not functions of calendar year are unique. In developed

Acknowledgements

Financial support for the cohort studies was provided by Health Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (formerly the Medical Research Council of Canada), Canadian Human Resources and Skills Development, the Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec, the Réseau Sida et Maladies infectieuses of the Fonds de recherche en santé du Québec (FRSQ) and the Direction de santé publique de Montréal. Financial support for the present analyses was provided by a team grant from the

References (59)

  • O.G. Bukstein

    Adolescent Substance Abuse: Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment

    (1995)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP)

    Trends in injection drug use among persons entering addiction treatment—New Jersey, 1992–1999

    Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.

    (2001)
  • M.C. Clatts et al.

    Correlates and distribution of HIV risk behaviors among homeless youths in New York City: implications for prevention and policy

    Child Welfare

    (1998)
  • D. Clayton et al.

    Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. I. Age-period and age-cohort models

    Stat. Med.

    (1987)
  • N. Crofts et al.

    Incidence of bloodborne virus infection and risk behaviors in a cohort of injecting drug users in Victoria, 1990–1995

    Can. Med. Assoc. J.

    (1997)
  • D.C. Des Jarlais et al.

    AIDS and the transition to illicit drug injection-results of a randomized trial prevention program

    Br. J. Addict.

    (1992)
  • D.C. Des Jarlais et al.

    Behavioral risk reduction in a declining HIV epidemic: injection drug users in New York City, 1990–1997

    Am. J. Public Health

    (2000)
  • J.S. Fennema et al.

    The relative importance of young and recent-onset injection drug users in Amsterdam HIV epidemic 1986–1995

    Int. Conf. AIDS

    (1996)
  • J.S. Fennema et al.

    Young and recent-onset injecting drug users are at higher risk for HIV

    Addiction

    (1997)
  • L. Fournier et al.

    Dénombrement de la clientèle itinérante dans les centres d’hébergement, les soupes populaires et les centres de jour des villes de Montréal et Québec 1996–97. 2-Montréal: premiers résultats [Census of the homeless population in shelters, soup kitchens and day drop-in centres in the cities of Montreal and Quebec, 1996–1997. 2-Montreal: first results]

    (1998)
  • N. Haley et al.

    HIV risk profile of male street youth involved in survival sex

    Sex. Transm. Infect.

    (2004)
  • C. Hankins et al.

    Continuing HIV transmission among injection drug users in Eastern Central Canada: the SurvUDI Study, 1995 to 2000

    J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr.

    (2002)
  • C. Hartgers et al.

    Changes over time in heroin and cocaine use among injecting drug users in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1985–1989

    Br. J. Addict.

    (1991)
  • N. Hunt et al.

    Evaluation of a brief intervention to prevent initiation into injecting

    Drugs: Educ. Prev. Policy

    (1998)
  • G.M. Hunter et al.

    Changes in the injecting risk behavior of injecting drug users in London 1990–1993

    AIDS

    (1995)
  • M.D. Kipke et al.

    Drug use, needle sharing, and HIV risk among injection drug-using street youth

    Subst. Use Misuse

    (1996)
  • A.H. Kral et al.

    Sex- and drug-related risk among populations of younger and older injection drug users in adjacent neighborhoods in San Francisco

    J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol.

    (2000)
  • A.H. Kral et al.

    Prevalence of sexual risk behaviour and substance use among runaway and homeless adolescents in San Francisco, Denver and New York City

    Int. J. STD AIDS

    (1997)
  • M.W. Langendam et al.

    Trends in HIV risk behavior and methadone dosage among HIV-negative drug users: an ecological study

    AIDS

    (2000)
  • Cited by (37)

    • Hepatitis C transmission in young people who inject drugs: Insights using a dynamic model informed by state public health surveillance

      2019, Epidemics
      Citation Excerpt :

      While simulated intervention are an approximation to real-world initiatives and provide an estimate of the potential efficacy of interventions, they do not include the full scope of intervention implementation and adherence challenges that impact intervention effectiveness in the real-world. Finally, in some simulations, our model's estimated injection initiation rates exceeded values found in the literature (Parriott and Auerswald, 2009; Roy et al., 2003, 2007; Ompad et al., 2005; Stein et al., 2009; Young and Havens, 2012; Chami et al., 2013; Arreola et al., 2014; Lake et al., 2016; Bluthenthal et al., 2017; Reddon et al., 2018). This discrepancy in injection initiation rates could be for several reasons, including that injection initiation rates were not available for Michigan, that available studies were conducted among specific populations (e.g. Canadian street youth), or because high estimated values of injection initiation rates were artifacts of poorly fitting simulations or ill-suited initial conditions to data.

    • Initiation into prescription opioid misuse amongst young injection drug users

      2012, International Journal of Drug Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Initiation into prescription opioid misuse is an important public health concern since opioids are increasingly associated with drug dependence (SAMHSA, 2008; Weiss et al., 2010) and fatal overdose (Paulozzi & Xi, 2008; SAMHSA, 2010b). Young injection drugs users (IDUs) – persons aged 30 and younger who currently inject drugs (e.g., Fuller et al., 2001; Hagan et al., 2010; Page et al., 2009; Roy, Boudreau, Leclerc, Boivin, & Godin, 2007) – are a particularly high-risk subgroup of adolescents and young adults (Davidson, Ochoa, Hahn, Evans, & Moss, 2002; Miller et al., 2004; Rondinelli et al., 2009; Thorpe et al., 2002). Young IDUs – whose lifetime prevalence of heroin has approached 100% in some studies (Havens, Sherman, Sapun, & Strathdee, 2006; Ochoa et al., 2005) – are at increased risk for initiation and misuse of prescription opioids (SAMHSA, 2009b).

    • Correlates of risky injection practices among past-year injection drug users among the US general population

      2011, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      These results can be found in Tables 6 and 7, respectively. A great deal of intervention work has been performed with IDU populations, and some evidence, though mixed, shows that risky injection practices are on the decline (Roy et al., 2007; Nelson et al., 2002; Des Jarlais et al., 2000). The results of the present analyses indicate that some proportion of IDUs continue to engage in high risk injection behaviors.

    • The Cedar Project: Risk factors for transition to injection drug use among young, urban Aboriginal people

      2011, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Participants living primarily in the downtown areas of both cities were recruited through health care providers, street outreach and word of mouth. Similar to other young “at-risk” cohorts studied to explore the transmission of blood-borne diseases, our eligibility criteria included being between 14 and 30 years of age and having smoked or injected illicit drugs, other than marijuana, in the month before enrolment.20,21 Drug use was confirmed using saliva screens (Oral-screen, Avitar Onsite Diagnostics).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text