Review article
Oral osmotically driven systems: 30 years of development and clinical use

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2009.07.002Get rights and content

Abstract

The number of marketed oral osmotically driven systems (OODS) has doubled in the last 10 years. The main clinical benefits of OODS are their ability to improve treatment tolerability and patient compliance. These advantages are mainly driven by the capacity to deliver drugs in a sustained manner, independent of the drug chemical properties, of the patient’s physiological factors or concomitant food intake. However, access to these technologies has been restricted by the crowded patent landscape and manufacturing challenges. In this review article, we intend to give an overview of the OODS development in the last 30 years, detailing the technologies, specific products and their clinical use. General guidance on technology selection is described in light of the recent advances in the field. The clinical performance of these technologies is also discussed, with a focus on food effects and the in vivo–in vitro correlation. Special attention is paid to safety given the controversial case study of Osmosin®. Overall, oral osmotically driven systems appear to be a promising technology for product life-cycle strategies.

Section snippets

Overview on 30 years of OODS development

Controlled drug delivery has taken an important place in pharmaceutical development, improving the tolerability and patient compliance with prescribed dosing regimens [1], [2], [3]. Despite the predominant use of polymer-based systems, alternatives have been developed to decrease the influence of the various physiological factors that occur following food intake or that are dependent on patient age [2], [3], [4]. One of the most promising technologies is the oral osmotically driven system

Literature review

The information sources dealing with OODS are relatively restricted and are often limited with respect to full retrieval of all technical details. As described in Fig. 2, information has been mainly obtained through intellectual property (IP) publications, which to some extent, are difficult to analyze and judge [30]. Only 14 research papers were published on the formulation aspects of osmotic systems versus 161 patents on the same topic until the year 2000. In 90%, of these, Alza Corp.

Technology panel and selection

Ideally, the selection of the OODS technology needs to be done with consideration for the desired pharmacokinetic profile of the drug product. The approach is to control the drug plasma profile by managing the drug release kinetics from the OODS as shown in Fig. 3. To a large extent, the formulation strategy is based on the biopharmaceutical classification (BCS) of a particular drug substance, as proposed by Corrigan and Amidon [40], [41], [42] and illustrated in Fig. 4: Only drugs with a high

Safety and precautions

In discussing the development of the OODS, one main safety aspect must be addressed as a prerequisite—the drug substance irritant property to the target site. Thus, in the case of the delivery of irritating drug substances, the concern is over the local delivery of the drug from an OODS with impaired transit through the GI tract, which might lead to gut wall irritations. In the worst case, it can result in gut wall perforations, as has been reported from patients receiving the indomethacin

Conclusion

Development efforts of oral osmotically driven systems (OODSs) during recent years have been very dynamic with the emergence of new technologies and products. With the expiration of the OODS primary patents and the increasing demand of health authorities for improved patient treatment compliance and tolerability, the OODS is primed to increase their market within oral modified-release dosage forms. Developed as a drug delivery platform for delivering drugs regardless of their physico-chemical

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to Drs Patrice Guitard, Dilraj Singh and Dieter Becker, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland, for the stimulating discussions and scientific contributions.

References (193)

  • L. Liu et al.

    Solubility-modulated monolithic osmotic pump tablet for atenolol delivery

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2008)
  • D. Prabakaran et al.

    Effect of hydrophilic polymers on the release of diltiazem hydrochloride from elementary osmotic pumps

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2003)
  • K. Okimoto et al.

    Applicability of (SBE) (7m)-beta-CD in controlled-porosity osmotic pump tablets (OPTs)

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2004)
  • L. Liu et al.

    Monolithic osmotic tablet system for nifedipine delivery

    J. Control. Rel.

    (2000)
  • C. Bindschaedler et al.

    Osmotic water transport through cellulose acetate membranes produced from a latex system

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1987)
  • J.L. Jensen et al.

    Variables that affect the mechanism of drug release from osmotic pumps coated with acrylate/methacrylate copolymer latexes

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1995)
  • J. Shokri et al.

    Swellable elementary osmotic pump (SEOP): an effective device for delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2008)
  • N. Ozdemir et al.

    Design of a controlled release osmotic pump system of ibuprofen

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1997)
  • L.X. Liu et al.

    Preparation of monolithic osmotic pump system by coating the indented core tablet

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2006)
  • G.M. Zentner et al.

    Controlled porosity solubility-modulated and resin-modulated osmotic drug delivery systems for release of diltiazem hydrochloride

    J. Control. Rel.

    (1991)
  • H. Liu et al.

    Chitosan-based controlled porosity osmotic pump for colon-specific delivery system: screening of formulation variables and in vitro investigation

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2007)
  • C.M. Amabile et al.

    Overview of oral modified-release opioid products for the management of chronic pain

    Ann. Pharmacother.

    (2006)
  • L.M. Prisant et al.

    Drug delivery systems for treatment of systemic hypertension

    Clin. Pharmacokinet.

    (2003)
  • E.L. Michelson

    Calcium-antagonists in cardiology – update on sustained-release drug delivery systems

    Clin. Cardiol.

    (1991)
  • R. Conley et al.

    Clinical spectrum of the osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system (OROS), an advanced oral delivery form

    Curr. Med. Res. Opin.

    (2006)
  • J.S. Grundy et al.

    The nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS). Evaluation of pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties

    Clin. Pharmacokinet.

    (1996)
  • D.M. Bass et al.

    Gastrointestinal safety of an extended-release, nondeformable, oral dosage form (OROS (R)) – a retrospective study

    Drug Saf.

    (2002)
  • S. Rose et al.

    A continuous long-term injector

    Aust. J. Exp. Biol.

    (1955)
  • T. Higuchi, H. Leeper, Alza Corp. Osmotic dispenser, US Patent 3732,865, May 15,...
  • F. Theeuwes, T. Higuchi, Osmotic dispensing device for releasing beneficial agent, US Patent 3845,770, May 11,...
  • M. Weintraub et al.

    Phenylpropanolamine OROS (Acutrim) vs. placebo in combination with caloric restriction and physician-managed behavior modification

    Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.

    (1986)
  • K. Heilmann

    Gits – a new medicine administration system

    Zeit. Rheum.

    (1982)
  • J.V. Bertouch et al.

    Pharmacokinetics of indomethacin gits (osmotically controlled delivery system)

    Aust. NZ. J. Med.

    (1983)
  • H. Francis et al.

    The gastro intestinal therapeutic systems (gits) for indomethacin to decrease side-effects

    Aust. NZ. J. Med.

    (1983)
  • A. Calin

    Intestinal perforation associated with osmotic slow release indomethacin capsules

    Br. Med. J.

    (1984)
  • P. Donnelly

    Indomethacin and perforated duodenal ulcer

    Br. Med. J.

    (1980)
  • A. Naciazek-Wieniawska et al.

    Studies on the cumulation of the toxic effect of indomethacin

    Pol. Med. Sci. Hist. Bull.

    (1975)
  • M.E. Shack

    Drug induced ulceration and perforation of the small intestine

    Ariz. Med.

    (1966)
  • M. Weintraub et al.

    P+T committee review of nifedipine gits – new modality for angina and hypertension

    Hosp. Form.

    (1990)
  • L.M. Ruilope

    Long-term protection in at-risk hypertensive patients – a role for nifedipine GITS?

    Blood Press

    (2002)
  • L.M. Prisant et al.

    nifedipine gits (gastrointestinal therapeutic system) bezoar

    Arch. Int. Med.

    (1991)
  • H.Y. Kwon et al.

    Small bowel procardia XL tablet bezoar mimicking cystic pneumatosis intestinalis

    Abdom. Imag.

    (1996)
  • D. Coghill et al.

    Osmotic, controlled-release methylphenidate for the treatment of ADHD

    Expert Opin. Pharmacother.

    (2006)
  • A.M. Kaushal et al.

    An update on osmotic drug delivery patents

    Pharm. Tech.

    (2003)
  • P. Kumar et al.

    An overview of recent patents on oral osmotic drug delivery systems

    Recent Patent Drug Del. Form.

    (2007)
  • R.K. Verma et al.

    Osmotically controlled oral drug delivery

    Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.

    (2000)
  • R.K. Verma et al.

    Osmotic pumps in drug delivery

    Crit Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst.

    (2004)
  • P.A. Meredith

    The unique adalat story – nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system

    Eur. Cardiovasc. Dis.

    (2007)
  • F. Theeuwes

    Evolution and design of ‘rate controlled’ osmotic forms

    Curr. Med. Res. Opin.

    (1983)
  • S.K. Gupta et al.

    Pharmacokinetics of an oral once-a-day controlled-release oxybutynin formulation compared with immediate-release oxybutynin

    J. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (122)

    • Rate Processes in Pharmaceutics

      2023, Pharmaceutics: Basic Principles and Application to Pharmacy Practice, Second Edition
    • Osmotic tablet coatings: Drying stress, mechanical properties and microstructure

      2022, International Journal of Pharmaceutics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thin coatings of polymer films find numerous technological applications in industries related to protective and functional coatings. Of particular focus in this study are the coatings used in the pharmaceutical industry, where tablets are coated with thin polymer films for branding, to improve appearance or taste, increase stability or to achieve sustained or delayed release of the drug (Zaid, 2020; Joshia and Petereit, 2013; Malaterre et al., 2009). The coating process in a standard tablet coater involves spraying small drops of polymer solution onto a bed of tablets via an atomizer.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text