Seroma prevention following axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer by using ultrasound scissors: a prospective clinical study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2004.03.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Aims. Seroma formation following axillary dissection is a common complication of breast surgery. The aims of this study were (1) to analyse the risk factors of seroma formation, and (2) to evaluate the role of ultrasound scissors in performing axillary dissection in patients with primary breast cancer undergoing mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery.

Methods. Ninety-two women (median age 55 years, range 33–73 years) requiring surgery for known unilateral primary breast cancer (pT1a=1, pT1b=20, pT1c=43, pT2=25, pT3=3) were prospectively randomised to undergo axillary dissection by either using (Group A, 45 patients) or not using (Group B, 47 patients) ultrasound scissors (US). Thirty-eight (41.3%) patients underwent modified radical mastectomy, while 54 (58.7%) underwent breast-conserving surgery.

Results. Twenty-eight (30.4%) patients (Group A=9 out of 45, 20%; Group B=19 out of 47, 42%; P=NS) developed a wound seroma. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model showed that surgical procedure (RR=8.9; 95% CI: 3.2–25.3), total amount of drainage (RR=7.8; 95% CI: 2.8–22.0), and size of the tumour (RR=6.0; 95% CI: 2.2–16.5) independently correlated with seroma formation. The logistic regression function (RR=19.4; 95% CI: 6–62) correctly allocated 75 out of 92 (81.5%) patients.

Conclusions. Size of the tumour, and total amount of drainage represent the principal factors of seroma formation following axillary dissection in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. Although the use of ultrasound cutting devices may reduce the risk of seroma formation, further studies are need to verify the real impact on long-term morbidity of such technique.

Introduction

Seroma formation following axillary dissection is a common wound complication of both modified radical mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery. The incidence of such occurrence varies widely, according to the type of surgical treatment and the operative techniques used, ranging from less than 10% to more than 50%.1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. The optimal way to reduce seroma formation and its pathophysiology are still unknown. Several aetiological factors have been suggested, including patient's age, breast size, number of involved nodes, or use of electocautery, and there are widely varying recommendations to prevent the development of a seroma.7

We report the results of a preliminary prospective trial with the aim to analyse the risk factors of seroma formation and the role of ultrasound scissors (US) in performing axillary dissection in patients undergoing curative surgery for breast cancer (BC).

Section snippets

Methods

Ninety-two women (median age 55 years, range 33–73 years) requiring surgery for known unilateral primary BC were prospectively randomised to undergo axillary dissection by either using (Group A, 45 patients) or not using (Group B, 47 patients) US. Randomisation was obtained by the use of random-number table. There were 27 pre-menopausal women, and 65 post-menopausal women. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient, who agree to participate in a study that had full ethical approval

Results

All patients who were enrolled in the study completed the trial. The main characteristics of the tumours in the overall population at final pathology are reported in Table 1. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the overall population was 24.1±2.8 (range 19.2–31.2) kg/m2. Sixty-three (68.5%) patients had negative nodes (N0), whilst 29 had histologically confirmed lymph node involvement (N1). The mean number of removed nodes was 17.5±4.1 (range 11–27), whilst the number of positive nodes was

Discussion

Unfortunately, in patients with BC undergoing surgery, neither preoperative imaging studies11., 12., 13. nor sentinel node biopsy technique14., 15., 16., 17. may at present reach 100% sensitivity in detecting (or excluding) axillary node metastases. Results are promising, but accuracy of diagnostic tests might be highly dependent on the number of histologically involved lymph nodes, especially when lymph-node micro-metastases could be missed.15 Thus, axillary dissection still represents the

Acknowledgements

A special thank you to Dr Silvia Dall'Acqua for help in writing the manuscript and for reviewing the English.

References (42)

  • A Wedderburn et al.

    Comparison between low and high pressure drainage following axillary clearance

    Eur J Surg Oncol

    (2000)
  • R Gupta et al.

    A comparison of 5-day and 8-day drainage following mastectomy and axillary clearance

    Eur J Surg Oncol

    (2001)
  • K.A Porter et al.

    Electrocautery as a factor in seroma formation following mastectomy

    Am J Surg

    (1998)
  • R Anand et al.

    A prospective randomised trial of two treatments for wound seroma after breast surgery

    Eur J Surg Oncol

    (2002)
  • H Galatius et al.

    Mastectomy using ultrasonic dissection: effect on seroma formation

    Breast

    (2003)
  • G Tejler et al.

    Comparisons and hospital stay after surgery for breast cancer: a prospective study of 385 patients

    Br J Surg

    (1985)
  • R.A Hofler et al.

    Wound complications following radical mastectomy: an analysis of perioperative factors

    J Am Osteopath Assoc

    (1990)
  • P.J O'Dwyer et al.

    Effect of closing dead space on incidence of seroma after mastectomy

    Surg Gynecol Obstet

    (1991)
  • E.C Coveney et al.

    Effect of closing dead space on seroma formation after mastectomy. A prospective randomised clinical study

    Eur J Surg Oncol

    (1993)
  • W Burak et al.

    Seroma formation following axillary dissection for breast cancer: risk factors and lack of influence of bovine thrombin

    J Surg Oncol

    (1997)
  • S Schmidbauer et al.

    Experience with ultrasound scissors and blades (UltraCision) in open and laparoscopic liver resection

    Ann Surg

    (2002)
  • Cited by (102)

    • Effect of quilting on seroma formation in mastectomies: A meta-analysis

      2021, Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A review by Kuroi et al. found several associations with seroma formation, such as obesity, hypertension, longer operation time, lack of drainage, electrocautery use, and drainage volume in the first 3 post-operative days [14]. Some studies found that patients over the age of 60 were at higher risk for seromas [15–17] while others found no such difference [18,19]. Along with risk factors, studies have attempted to elucidate seroma prevention strategies, like the use of sharp or ultrasonic dissection [20–24], and introduction of talc into the wound cavity [25,26].

    • Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Reduces Seroma Production After Modified Radical Mastectomy or Quadrantectomy With Lymph Node Dissection—A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

      2017, Clinical Breast Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, the number of lymph nodes removed and the number of infiltrated lymph nodes were found to be significantly greater in the cases than in the controls. A greater number of removed lymph nodes, including infiltrated ones, would be expected to be associated with increased seroma production.32 However, such a finding was not confirmed in our study, which, again, can be attributed to the use of cyanoacrylate adhesive in our case patients.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text