Palliative gastrectomy and other factors affecting overall survival in stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma patients receiving chemotherapy: A retrospective analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2011.01.019Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Most patients with gastric cancer present with locally advanced or metastatic disease and usually receive palliative therapy. We sought to identify factors influencing overall survival in patients with stage IV gastric cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy.

Patients and methods

The records of 311 patients with histological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed and 17 clinicopathological and therapeutic parameters were evaluated for their influence on overall survival.

Results

In multivariate analysis nine factors were found to independently influence survival: no previous palliative gastrectomy [Hazard ratio (HR, 12; CI 7.969–18.099)], single agent chemotherapy instead of combination chemotherapy (HR, 1.35; CI 1.068–1.721), histological grade III (HR, 1.39; 95% CI 1.098–1.782), the presence of hepatic (HR, 1.6; 95% CI 1.246–2.073) and abdominal metastasis (HR, 1.33; 95% CI 1.039–1.715), CA 72-4 > 7 U/L (HR, 1.39; 95% CI 1.026–1.887), LDH > 225 U/L (HR, 1.72; 95% CI 1.336–2.236], need for blood transfusions (HR, 1.58; 95% CI 1.213–2.082), and weight loss > 5% (HR, 1.96; 95% CI 1.352–2.853) at the time of initial diagnosis. Patients were stratified as low (0–2 factors), intermediate (3–6 factors) and high (7–9 factors) risk and the median survival was 76, 40 and 11 weeks, respectively.

Conclusion

Nine clinical and laboratory factors that adversely affect survival in patients with stage IV gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy were identified. Their concurrent presence seems to have an additive effect as patients with seven to nine factors have the worse prognosis. Palliative gastrectomy and combination chemotherapy appear to be associated with improved survival.

Introduction

Gastric cancer is an aggressive tumor, posing the second leading cause of cancer specific mortality worldwide. Disease prevalence is higher in countries of northeast Asia (Japan, Korea, China), intermediate in Europe, South America and lower in North America, Australia and New Zealand. Overall survival in the United States, Europe and China is 20–25%, however reported survival in Japan is better (52%) which could be attributed to early detection through nationwide implementation of screening programs and optimized management.1 In Greece, mortality rates from gastric cancer have been reported to be 10.9 and 5.8/105 for men and women, respectively.2

Surgery is considered to be the most appropriate treatment for gastric cancer. However, the majority of gastric cancer patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease, despite the progress in diagnostic modalities and curative resection is feasible in only 36% of cases; moreover, even patients with presumed resectable disease have relapse rates of 40–60%.3 Evidently, palliative treatment evolves as the primary management strategy for many gastric cancer patients. A number of trials have justified the use of palliative chemotherapy as compared to best supportive care to improve patient survival.4 On the contrary, there is still insufficient evidence to recommend palliative gastrectomy in terms of survival benefit and therefore, the decision for surgery in current practice is individualized based on patient’s clinical status and local surgical expertise, aiming at symptom relief and maintenance of patient’s independence and function.

Given that chemotherapy and/or surgery could be associated with significant complications, there is a need to identify prognostic factors which may determine treatment response and survival in stage IV gastric cancer patients. Such an approach could refine palliative management according to the likelihood of clinical benefit. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting survival in patients with stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma receiving palliative chemotherapy.

Section snippets

Patients and data sources

The medical records of 311 patients who received chemotherapy for histopathologically diagnosed stage IV gastric cancer between February 1997 and October 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. All were consecutive non-selected cases from a single Oncology Center and all patients were treated outside of clinical trials. Stage IV gastric cancer was defined based on American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC, 6th edition) as M1 or T4N1–3M0.5 Patients with Gastro-Esophageal junction tumors, lymphoma and

Patients

311 patients with Stage IV gastric cancer were included in this analysis. The median age was 62 years (range: 30–74) and the frequencies of the clinicopathological variables are shown in Table 1. Palliative surgery was performed in 70% of patients. All patients received chemotherapy; single agent and combination chemotherapy were administered in 43.5% and 56.5% of patients, respectively.

Overall survival

Survival data were collected for all patients. No patient was alive by the time of this analysis. The 1-year

Discussion

We retrospectively analyzed data from 311 patients with Stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma who had undergone palliative chemotherapy. Our analysis demonstrated that factors associated with disease burden had a negative effect on survival. These included the presence of hepatic and abdominal/peritoneal metastasis, histological grade III, elevated CA 72-4 levels, elevated LDH levels and poor functional status at the time of initial presentation as indicated by weight loss > 5% and anemia

Conclusions

A number of factors may independently influence survival in stage IV gastric cancer patients. Factors associated with the severity of the disease such as the presence of hepatic and abdominal/peritoneal metastasis, histological grade III, elevated CA 72-4, elevated LDH and poor functional status at time of initial diagnosis as indicated by weight loss >5% and anemia necessitating blood transfusions have a detrimental effect on survival. Therapeutic modalities such as palliative gastrectomy and

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Dimitrios Boulamatsis for performing the statistical tests.

References (30)

  • M. D’Angelica et al.

    Patterns of initial recurrence in completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma

    Ann Surg

    (2004)
  • A.D. Wagner et al.

    Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data

    J Clin Oncol

    (2006)
  • Cancer staging manual

    (2003)
  • I. Chau et al.

    Multivariate prognostic factor analysis in locally advanced and metastatic esophago-gastric cancer–pooled analysis from three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials using individual patient data

    J Clin Oncol

    (2004)
  • H.H. Hartgrink et al.

    Value of palliative resection in gastric cancer

    Br J Surg

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text