Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 53, Issue 2, February 2008, Pages 323-332
European Urology

Prostate Cancer
Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer Treated with Docetaxel and Estramustine: A Single Institution Experience

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.072Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate potential prognostic and predictive factors in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) treated with docetaxel chemotherapy.

Methods

This analysis included 94 consecutive AIPC patients who were treated between March 2001 and May 2006 with biweekly docetaxel 45 mg/m2 (day 2) and estramustine 140 mg three dimes daily (days 1–3).

Results

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses were observed in 45 of 84 evaluable patients (53%), whereas objective responses were observed in 16 of 40 patients with measurable disease (40%). Median survival (OS) was 16.2 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.9–19.4) and median time to PSA progression (TTP) 5.0 mo (95%CI, 3.6–7.1). OS was independently associated with pain score baseline PSA and weight loss. Patients with only extraosseous disease had higher PSA response rate (87% vs. 49%, p = 0.014) and superior TTP compared with patients with bone metastases with or without extraosseous disease (7.3 vs. 4.3 vs. 4 mo, p = 0.002). Concurrent bone and extraosseous metastases were associated with worse prognosis compared with each site alone (median OS: 12.3 vs.19 vs.18.3 mo, p = 0.007).

Conclusions

Among patients with AIPC treated with biweekly docetaxel and estramustine, baseline PSA >100, existence of pain, weight loss, and simultaneous extraosseous and bone disease were associated with worse prognosis. Extraosseous metastases seem to be more sensitive than bone disease to this chemotherapy.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is a rising public health issue in the context of “aging” Western societies, accounting for 30% of new male cancer diagnoses in the United States [1]. While early-stage prostate cancer can be cured with surgery or radiation therapy, this is not the case for metastatic disease. Androgen-deprivation therapy is effective in the majority of patients with advanced prostate cancer; however, disease control is achieved for only an average period of 12–24 mo [2], and all patients ultimately develop “androgen-independent” cancers (AIPC), unresponsive to hormonal manipulations [2], [3].

AIPC is an invariably lethal condition associated with significant deterioration of the quality of life. Analgesics, external beam radiation, bone-seeking isotopes such as strontium-89, biphosphonates, and glucocorticoids are widely employed for palliation, with variable success [4]. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has been, until recently, considered largely ineffective in AIPC [5]. Mitoxantrone with prednisone or hydrocortisone proved to confer symptomatic relief and quality of life improvement for a large proportion of patients, but it failed to prolong survival [6], [7]. Recently, docetaxel has replaced mitoxantrone as the standard of care for patients with metastatic AIPC. Two recent phase 3 trials showed that docetaxel with estramustine or prednisone improved overall survival compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone [8], [9]. Since 2001, we have been treating patients with AIPC with a 2-weekly docetaxel and estramustine combination. The results in the first 54 patients were encouraging with 45% PSA response rate, 38% objective response rate, and a median survival of 13.3 mo [10]. This regime was well tolerated with grade 3 or 4 toxicities reported in only five cases. In addition, pain was improved in 54% and analgesic consumption was reduced in 40% of the patients.

In spite of the recent advances, the prognosis of AIPC remains poor and a significant proportion of patients do not benefit from docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Therefore, selection of patients likely to benefit from chemotherapy is essential, since patients with AIPC are often in poor general condition or have other comorbidities, which increase the likelihood of chemotherapy-related complications. In a relatively limited number of reports various factors, such as age, hemoglobin, time to AIPC, extent of metastatic disease PSA levels, and doubling time have been associated with survival [11], [12], [13], [14]. Nevertheless, these analyses were confounded by inhomogenous treatment and did not include patients treated with docetaxel, which represents the current standard of care. We, therefore, investigated the association of response and outcome of AIPC patients treated with biweekly docetaxel and estramustine, with baseline clinical characteristics attempting to identify potential prognostic and predictive factors in this population.

Section snippets

Patients

Since 2001 all patients with AIPC were uniformly treated with first-line biweekly docetaxel and estramustine and were entered into our Prostate Cancer Database. The selection of the patients included in this analysis was based on the following criteria: histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate, evidence of progressive disease despite complete androgen deprivation and antiandrogen withdrawal, presence of measurable or evaluable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

Patients

From March 2001 to May 2006, 94 consecutive patients with AIPC were treated in our center with biweekly docetaxel and estramustine. Their baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median number of chemotherapy courses per patient was 9 (range: 2–21). Eighty-two patients (87%) had bone metastases with or without other metastatic sites. The remaining 12 patients (13%) had extraosseous disease without evidence of skeletal involvement: 2 patients had recurrent disease within previously

Discussion

We report an analysis for prognostic and predictive factors in patients with AIPC uniformly treated with biweekly docetaxel plus 3-d estramustine. PSA and objective responses as well as TTP, OS, and toxicity were similar to those reported by our group in a smaller cohort [10], confirming that this regime is convenient, well tolerated, and effective in patients with AIPC. Furthermore, our efficacy results are comparable to available experience with weekly and 21-d docetaxel-based regimens [8],

Conclusions

Biweekly docetaxel with 3-d estramustine is an efficient and well-tolerated regimen in patients with AIPC. In our cohort of patients, weight loss, pain score, and baseline PSA proved of prognostic value. Extraosseous disease may be associated with better response to chemotherapy, while skeletal plus extraosseous disease was associated with poorer outcome. Nevertheless, clinicopathologic characteristics may not achieve selection of patients with distinctly different prognoses. This selection

Conflicts of interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

References (34)

  • A. Yagoda et al.

    Cytotoxic chemotherapy for advanced hormone-resistant prostate cancer

    Cancer

    (1993)
  • I.F. Tannock et al.

    Chemotherapy with mitoxantrone plus prednisone or prednisone alone for symptomatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer: a Canadian randomized trial with palliative end points

    J Clin Oncol

    (1996)
  • D. Osoba et al.

    Health-related quality of life in men with metastatic prostate cancer treated with prednisone alone or mitoxantrone and prednisone

    J Clin Oncol

    (1999)
  • D.P. Petrylak et al.

    Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • I.F. Tannock et al.

    Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • R. Wyatt et al.

    Prognostic factors for survival among Caucasian, African-American and Hispanic men with androgen-independent prostate cancer

    J Natl Med Assoc

    (2004)
  • P. Sabbatini et al.

    Prognostic significance of extend of disease in bone in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (1999)
  • Cited by (22)

    • 2-weekly versus 3-weekly docetaxel to treat castration-resistant advanced prostate cancer: A randomised, Phase 3 trial

      2013, The Lancet Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In another analysis, patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer were treated with 45 mg/m2 docetaxel every 2 weeks plus estramustine. PSA response was observed in 45 (53%) of 84 patients and objective tumour response in 16 (40%) of 40 patients with measurable disease, and median survival was 16·2 months.23 Similar results were reported from a series of patients treated with 45 mg/m2 docetaxel every 2 weeks plus estramustine and zoledronic acid, in whom PSA response was seen in 22 (45%) of 49 patients and median survival was 13·3 months.24

    • Platelet Microparticles: A Potential Predictive Factor of Survival in Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy

      2009, European Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      We found that baseline PMP level was significantly related with survival of HRPC patients treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Other important variables such as baseline PSA and ECOG PS were associated with the outcome of HRPC patients, as recently shown by Bamias et al [27]. Our cohort of patients was homogeneous, with no potential source of bias; however, the sample size and the short follow-up restricted the statistical power of this exploratory analysis, which possibly explains why the multivariate model did not highlight a significant impact of PMPs on OS.

    • Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients (Age 75 and Older) with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

      2009, European Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      There was also a nonsignificant trend for pain to independently predict for OS (p = 0.06). PS and visceral metastases (particularly liver metastases) are recognised prognostic factors in the general population of patients with CRPC and were also found to be strong predictors of OS in previous reports, including the TAX327 study [28–31]. Despite the usual limitations of a retrospective study, our results indicate that patients >75 yr of age considered fit for the SR by their medical oncologist had a similar safety and efficacy profile to younger patients.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text