Elsevier

Forest Ecology and Management

Volume 262, Issue 7, 1 October 2011, Pages 1184-1188
Forest Ecology and Management

Post-fire analysis of pre-fire mapping of fire-risk: A recent case study from Mt. Carmel (Israel)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.011Get rights and content

Abstract

The recent devastating wildfire on Mt. Carmel provided a unique opportunity to evaluate a fire-risk map constructed for the region, published two years ago in this journal. This largest forest fire in the history of Israel, occurred during December 2010, covering 2180 ha, burning more than half-million trees and causing the loss of life of 45 people.

A study of fire risk in this area was conducted between 2007 and 2009 utilizing a combination of Monte Carlo simulation of spatial spread of fire ignition with fire behavior model (FARSITE). The fire risk map produced in 2009 is assessed here with reference to the area burnt during December 2010. The results showed that most of burnt areas corresponded to high risk levels in the risk map. According to a null model, the five lower risk levels taken together would have corresponded to 50% of the burnt area, while in fact they were presented in only 5.6% of the area. In contrast, the three highest risk levels, for which the null model expectation would be a representation of 30%, were represented in 87% of the area. Comparing the fire risk map against the map of the real recent fire provided support to the general approach, and strengthened the confidence of our fire risk model.

Highlights

► Recent wildfire on Mt. Carmel provided an opportunity to evaluate a fire-risk map. ► Most of burnt areas corresponded significantly to high risk levels in the risk map. ► The three highest risk levels occupied 87% of the area, while the five lower risk levels were present in only 5.6% of the area.

Introduction

Fire risk assessments are crucial in forest ecosystems, where high ecological value coincides with dense population (Shoshany and Goldshleger, 2002). High resolution fire risk maps enable managers to plan long-term strategic fire prevention activities (Galtie et al., 2003), yet until recently, fire risk maps were produced at resolutions too coarse to allow strategic planning at local levels (Pastor et al., 2003, Scott and Burgan, 2005). In a recent paper, Carmel et al. (2009) presented an approach in which fire risk was a function of the multitude of factors affecting fire behavior at high resolution, using Monte Carlo simulation of a fire behavior model (FARSITE, Finney, 1998). The model used a variety of inputs such as topography data, fuel information, weather conditions and human activity areas, among others parameters.

In the present study, Mt. Carmel National Park forest (located in northwestern Israel, Fig. 1) served as a pilot area. Although FARSITE does not have its own fuel model, it allows using custom fuel models (e.g. Anderson, 1982, Scott and Burgan, 2005). The basis for the fuel layer was a canopy cover layer coupled to a detailed map of the Mediterranean vegetation formations on Mt. Carmel (Fig. 1; see also Table 2 and more details in Carmel et al., 2009). A single fuel model was assigned to each major vegetation formation and heuristic adjustments were made to two of the fuel models of Scott and Burgan (2005). Fuel models #4 (chaparral) and #1 (herbaceous vegetation), were suppressed by a factor of two while fuel model #10 (conifer forests) was applied to the Eastern Mediterranean pine forests with an adjustment factor of 4 (see Carmel et al., 2009 for details and justification). Fig. 1 illustrates the distribution of fuel models in the study area.

Using the Monte Carlo simulations of fire spread, for each simulation run, a calendar date, fire length, ignition location, weather data and other parameters were selected randomly from known distributions of these parameters. Distance from road served as a proxy for the probability of ignition. The resulting 1000 maps of fire distribution (the entire area burnt in a specific fire) were overlaid to produce a map of ‘hotspots’ and ‘coldspots’ of fire frequency. The findings revealed a clear pattern of fires that seems to be affected by several factors including the location of urban areas, microclimate, topography and the distribution of ignition locations. Despite the fact that the results demonstrated the complexities of fire behavior, they showed a very clear pattern of risk levels even at fine scales (Carmel et al., 2009) where the distance between areas with different risk levels is only hundreds of meters or few kilometers. Our approach was then adopted in several other case studies (e.g. Bar Massada et al., 2009, Ager et al., 2010, Lorz et al., 2010).

The validation of spatially explicit models is not trivial, and in particular fire risk models are difficult to evaluate. Most fire risk studies do not provide any estimate of the associations between model and reality, and such measures are indeed very difficult to obtain. In our study, historic fires in the region served as a partial indication of model accuracy. Yet, immediate validation of a numerical model of this type has not been reported.

A unique opportunity to evaluate the reliability of the fire risk map occurred recently when a severe forest wildfire, the largest in the history of the state of Israel (since 1948), occurred in Mt. Carmel, Israel, between the 2nd and the 5th of December 2010, burnt more than half-million trees (unofficial estimate of the Israel Forest Authority). Unfortunately, the fire caused loss of life and property as well as severe damage to parts of the forest. The size of the burnt area was 2180 ha (Malkinson and Wittenberg, 2011). For comparison, according to Wittenberg et al. (2007), besides dozens of small fires, eight large wildfires were recorded on Mt. Carmel during the last three decades, each consuming areas of 80–530 ha.

During the past several decades, a sharp increase in fire events in the Mediterranean forests has been observed, especially where the anthropogenic pressure is high (FAO, 2001). This tendency exists in Mt. Carmel in which experienced increasing numbers of forest fires, as a result of increasing human activities (Wittenberg et al., 2007). Another influencing factor is the increase in drought processes as a consequence of climate change (Moriondo et al., 2006, Carvalho et al., 2010). Indeed, the weather conditions in Mt. Carmel prior to the wildfire and during its occurrence were exceptional. Summer 2010 was the warmest on record and the following fall was the warmest and driest in the last 40 years with a precipitation amount of about 10% of the perennial average rate of the season. As a result, the vegetation was unusually dry for this time of the year. December is a rainy month in Israel and there are no records of forest fires on this month. However, during the days of the recent wildfire, the air temperature was very high and the relative humidity was extremely low, below 10% (IMS, 2010). These conditions, together with strong dry eastern winds, fanned the fire and resulted in rapid spread of the fire (burnt area of 2180 ha within three days), flame elevation of 60 m and high intensity fire.

Section snippets

Material and methods

The aim of the current study is to compare between the fire risk map and the map of the actual recent fire, in order to validate the reliability of the model above. In principle, an actual fire can be viewed as a single realization of the fire risk model. If the model is a good predictor of fire, then we expect most of the burnt areas to correspond to high risk classes in the model map. On the other extreme, if the model is not informative at all, then the different risk levels would be

Results and discussion

The number of simulated fires that burnt in a specific location was considered as a surrogate of fire risk at that location. The region was divided into ten risk levels using an ‘equal area’ algorithm. We ran 1000 fire simulations, ‘fire’ frequency varied between 0 and 52 fires in a given location. For example, half of the area (risk levels 1–5) had fewer than 18 ‘fires’ in any given location, while the two highest risk levels (covering 20% of the area) suffered 33 fires or more (Fig. 2).

Conclusions

Fire risk models describe and predict a distribution of events. A fire event is a single realization of the predicted distribution. Fire is a complex phenomenon, and it is therefore reasonable to model fire risk using a complex structure that accounts for the many factors that affect fire ignition and propagation. Numerical and computational models are often the only scientific means for understanding and predicting complex, non-linear environmental phenomena. For predictive purposes, producing

References (23)

  • B. Efron et al.

    Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy

    Statistical Science

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text