Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 28, Issue 1, July 2008, Pages 93-100
Gait & Posture

Invasive in vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.10.009Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this work was to use bone anchored external markers to describe the kinematics of the tibia, fibula, talus, calcaneus, navicular, cuboid, medial cuneiform, first and fifth metatarsals during gait. Data were collected from six subjects. There was motion at all the joints studied. Movement between the talus and the tibia showed the expected predominance of sagittal plane motion, but the talocalcaneal joint displayed greater variability than expected in its motion. Movement at the talonavicular joint was greater than at the talocalcaneal joint and motion between the medial cuneiform and navicular was far greater than expected. Motion between the first metatarsal and the medial cuneiform was less than motion between the fifth metatarsal and cuboid. Overall the data demonstrated the complexity of the foot and the importance of the joints distal to the rearfoot in its overall dynamic function.

Introduction

The kinematics of the foot and ankle during walking are a topic of great interest both from the biomechanical and clinical aspect. Previous clinical experimental research has provided descriptions of calcaneal motion relative to the leg, tibial rotation relative to the foot, and the motion of various definitions of ‘forefoot’ or ‘midfoot’ segments relative to the heel [1], [2], [3], [4]. These studies have utilised skin-mounted markers to derive information on the motion of bones or assumed rigid segments during walking. There are several difficulties with describing the foot and ankle in this way. Firstly, there is good evidence that skin movement artefacts are likely to reduce the validity of the kinematic data [5], [6], [7], although it is not clear how they affect different parts of the foot. Secondly, in dividing the foot into several separate segments, an assumption is made that several of the individual bones of the foot do not move relatively to each other, and there is evidence that this is unlikely [8]. Measurements based on this assumption either miss important kinematics between bones, or attribute motion to one joint when it actually occurs at another, which has not been measured. Finally, descriptions of foot and ankle kinematics may be incomplete because not all foot bones are included in the measurements. This is particularly the case for the talus, which is inaccessible in vivo without an invasive approach.

To avoid some of these pitfalls an invasive in vivo approach has been used in several studies [6], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. However, these data have been limited to assessment of the tibia, talus and calcaneus during walking/running and have not assessed the mid or forefoot. Cadaver models are an alternative [8], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19] but these inevitably involve some compromise in the extent to which in vivo gait can be replicated. The aim of this work, therefore, was to provide high quality in vivo kinematic data to describe rear, mid and forefoot kinematics during walking. The following bones were studied: tibia, fibula, talus, calcaneus, navicular, cuboid, medial cuneiform, first and fifth metatarsal.

Section snippets

Method

The study was approved by the ethical committee of the University Hospital and six male volunteers (mean age 38 years, range 28–55, mean weight 85 kg, range 71–110, mean height 180.5 cm, range 176–183) gave informed consent to participate.

Prior to the experimental procedure, the subjects were acquainted with the laboratory and 9.5 m walking track. They performed barefoot walking trials to determine their starting position, self-selected speed and preferred cadence. Walking consistency was assisted

Results

The stance times for subjects was between 0.62 and 0.73 s (S.D. all <0.024). The intra-subject coefficients of multiple correlations (CMC) for the vertical ground reaction forces were 0.90–0.99. The CMC is used to reflect the extent to which the pattern of the data was consistent across the ten trials. These CMC values are evidence that the subjects walked in repeatable manner.

The mean total range of motion at each of the 11 joints for each participant, and the corresponding standard deviation

Discussion

One obvious but important observation is the fact that there was motion in all the studied joints during walking, thus all the joints contributed to the motion of the foot in walking. This is reflected in the combined motion at the three joints of the medial arch (mean motion between metatarsal one and the talus was 17.6°, 9.6° and 14.7° in the sagittal, frontal and transverse planes, Table 1). The ankle is often assumed to be the primary source of sagittal plane motion within the foot, but in

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest regarding this work and the authors.

Cited by (239)

  • Addressing Medial Column Instability in Flatfoot Deformity

    2023, Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery
View all citing articles on Scopus

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

View full text