Short communicationPlantar pressures determinants in mild Hallux Valgus
Introduction
Podobarometric techniques applied to the study of pressures in Hallux Valgus (HV) have given mixed results. They have commonly been associated with increased plantar pressures under the central [1] or lateral [2] metatarsal heads (MTHs). Nonetheless, these studies did not differentiate between different degrees of the pathology. Since this is a progressive disorder, mild HV would not have the same load distribution as moderate or severe HV [3]. It remains poorly understood, however, which variables are associated with the specific patterns of plantar pressure in the HV forefoot. Due to the progressive nature of the deformity, we consider it of great interest to study it at its onset. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to determine the magnitude and distribution of forefoot plantar pressure in participants with mild HV, compared with an age-matched healthy control group, and analyze the corresponding clinical and anthropometric determinants.
Section snippets
Participants
The sample consisted of 79 female participants with mild HV. The criteria for inclusion were: (a) pain over the medial eminence related to shoe wearing (b) bilateral mild HV; (c) 15° < HAA ≤ 30°, (d) 1st IMA ≤ 13°, (e) no evidence of osteoarthritis and (f) no pathology of the lesser toes.
Control group
The control group consisted of 98 healthy age-matched female participants who were screened by interview and physical examination for any foot or gait abnormalities. They had no history of significant foot or
Control group
The highest mean pressure (MP) scores were found under the 2nd MTH (403.8 ± 217.4 kPa), followed by the 3rd and 1st MTHs. The Hallux supported 146.5 ± 92.5 kPa (Table 1).
HV group
The Hallux presented a mean pressure of 328.5 kPa which was significantly higher (p = 0.001) than that of the control group (Table 1). The pressure under the 1st MTH was significantly higher in the mild HV group (Table 1). Fig. 1 summarizes the average results and significant differences between the control and HV groups.
The mean 1st
Discussion
The comparison between mild HV and normal feet showed that feet with mild HV display an altered pattern of plantar pressures under the first ray, with an increased pressure under the Hallux. In women with mild HV, the greater angular deviations were associated with a more severe clinical picture. Women with mild HV showed significantly higher pressure under the Hallux than controls. The negative correlation with the AOFAS score (r = −0.222, p = 0.026), although weak, demonstrated that participants
Conclusions
Women with mild HV had a pathologically increased pressure under the Hallux, caused by the first ray angular deviation. Pain and the AOFAS clinical score were related with the pressure under de 1st MTH. The other clinical, radiological, and baropodometric variables showed only a moderate influence on the pattern and values of plantar pressure.
Acknowledgements
Contribution: All authors have made substantial contributions to all of the following: (1) the conception and design of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data, (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, (3) final approval of the version to be submitted.
Conflict of interest
None.
References (10)
The pattern of forefoot pressure distribution in hallux valgus
Foot
(1995)Metatarsalgia in hallux valgus deformity: a pedographic analysis
J Foot Ankle Surg
(2002)- et al.
Biofoot® in-shoe system: normal values and assessment of the reliability and repeatability
Foot
(2007) - et al.
Clinical determinants of plantar forces and pressures during walking in older people
Gait Posture
(2006) - et al.
What is the inter- and intra-observer reliability of landmark placemant (in a hallux valgus group) within plantar pressure measurements
Gait Posture
(2006)