Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 32, Issue 3, July 2010, Pages 425-427
Gait & Posture

Short communication
Plantar pressures determinants in mild Hallux Valgus

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.015Get rights and content

Abstract

While podobarometric techniques have been applied to the study of pressures in Hallux Valgus (HV), little is known about its clinical and radiological determinants. So, the aim of the present study was to determine the plantar pressure pattern in participants with mild HV, comparing to a control group, and their clinical and anthropometric determinants. Biofoot/IBV® in-shoe system was used to evaluate 79 participants with mild HV. Computerized measurements of the 1st intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and the hallux abductus angle (HAA) were made on antero-posterior radiographs. The clinical outcome was assessed using the AOFAS score. The dependent baropodometric variables and the independent clinical and anthropometric variables were subjected to a multiple regression analysis. In both groups, the highest average pressure was in the 2nd metatarsal head (MTH). The mean pressure under the Hallux was significantly higher in HV group (controls, 146.5 ± 92.5 kPa; HV, 328.5 ± 113.2 kPa; p < 0.001). An 18.6% of average pressure under the 1st MTH was accounted for pain, first ray alignment and total AOFAS score. Variations of the HAA explained 26.8% of the mean Hallux pressure. Women with mild HV present with pathologically increased pressure under the Hallux, which is caused by the altered alignment of the first ray. Pain and clinical result were associated with the pressure under the 1st MTH and the remaining variables were only moderate predictors of dynamic plantar pressures.

Introduction

Podobarometric techniques applied to the study of pressures in Hallux Valgus (HV) have given mixed results. They have commonly been associated with increased plantar pressures under the central [1] or lateral [2] metatarsal heads (MTHs). Nonetheless, these studies did not differentiate between different degrees of the pathology. Since this is a progressive disorder, mild HV would not have the same load distribution as moderate or severe HV [3]. It remains poorly understood, however, which variables are associated with the specific patterns of plantar pressure in the HV forefoot. Due to the progressive nature of the deformity, we consider it of great interest to study it at its onset. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to determine the magnitude and distribution of forefoot plantar pressure in participants with mild HV, compared with an age-matched healthy control group, and analyze the corresponding clinical and anthropometric determinants.

Section snippets

Participants

The sample consisted of 79 female participants with mild HV. The criteria for inclusion were: (a) pain over the medial eminence related to shoe wearing (b) bilateral mild HV; (c) 15° < HAA  30°, (d) 1st IMA  13°, (e) no evidence of osteoarthritis and (f) no pathology of the lesser toes.

Control group

The control group consisted of 98 healthy age-matched female participants who were screened by interview and physical examination for any foot or gait abnormalities. They had no history of significant foot or

Control group

The highest mean pressure (MP) scores were found under the 2nd MTH (403.8 ± 217.4 kPa), followed by the 3rd and 1st MTHs. The Hallux supported 146.5 ± 92.5 kPa (Table 1).

HV group

The Hallux presented a mean pressure of 328.5 kPa which was significantly higher (p = 0.001) than that of the control group (Table 1). The pressure under the 1st MTH was significantly higher in the mild HV group (Table 1). Fig. 1 summarizes the average results and significant differences between the control and HV groups.

The mean 1st

Discussion

The comparison between mild HV and normal feet showed that feet with mild HV display an altered pattern of plantar pressures under the first ray, with an increased pressure under the Hallux. In women with mild HV, the greater angular deviations were associated with a more severe clinical picture. Women with mild HV showed significantly higher pressure under the Hallux than controls. The negative correlation with the AOFAS score (r = −0.222, p = 0.026), although weak, demonstrated that participants

Conclusions

Women with mild HV had a pathologically increased pressure under the Hallux, caused by the first ray angular deviation. Pain and the AOFAS clinical score were related with the pressure under de 1st MTH. The other clinical, radiological, and baropodometric variables showed only a moderate influence on the pattern and values of plantar pressure.

Acknowledgements

Contribution: All authors have made substantial contributions to all of the following: (1) the conception and design of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data, (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, (3) final approval of the version to be submitted.
Conflict of interest

None.

Cited by (0)

View full text