Recent advances in assessing gene flow between diverging populations and species

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2006.10.005Get rights and content

The evolutionary process of divergence, which ultimately leads to the generation of new species, is thought to occur usually without any gene exchange between the diverging populations. However, until the recent growth of multi-locus datasets, and the development of new population genetic methods, it has been very difficult to assess whether or not closely related species have, or have not, exchanged genes during their divergence. Several recent studies have found significant signals of gene flow during species formation, calling into question the conventional wisdom that gene flow is absent during speciation.

Introduction

If one discovers that two species are not reproductively isolated but have actually been hybridizing and exchanging genes, what is the first question to ask? For some practical concerns, the relevant question is the semantic one of ‘should they be identified as separate species?’. But a more basic evolutionary question is ‘how did the species separate from each other if they have been exchanging genes?’ Species are nearly always identified because some kind of divergence (e.g. morphological or genetic) from other species has been discovered. We also know that it only takes a small amount of gene flow to keep two populations from diverging [1]. So if divergence has happened and gene exchange has also been happening, then there is a conundrum.

The general answer to the puzzle is that divergence can happen at some genes, even if there is gene exchange for other genes. Hybrids carry a full set of genes from each population, but backcross hybrids do not, and so it is possible for some genes to pass between populations if backcross hybrids vary in their fitness depending on which genes they carry. In this way, natural selection, acting differently in two diverging populations, can prevent gene flow at some genes (i.e. the genes at which divergence is occurring) and can enable other genes to pass between the populations. In other words, divergence in the presence of gene exchange implies that natural selection is playing an active role in the divergence process [2, 3, 4].

This review covers recent developments and applications in the detection and estimation of gene flow between species that have recently diverged. Given that a number of studies have found evidence for gene flow, it appears that divergence and speciation may often occur in the presence of gene flow.

Section snippets

Population genetics and divergence

When one population separates into two, genetic variation will be shared for some period of time even in the absence of gene exchange [5, 6, 7]. Figure 1 shows an example of how genealogies are more likely to coalesce within species if separation times are longer ago. If the sizes of both populations are large, and gene trees are deep within populations, then genealogies and genetic variation might be shared at some genes for very long periods of time, possibly even after the populations have

Gene flow revealed by differences among genes

If population genetic data are available from multiple loci, for each of two divergent populations or species, then the patterns of variation at the different genes can be contrasted with one another. A history of divergence with gene flow is generally indicated if some loci show little divergence and others show a large amount of divergence, such that the variation in divergence among the different genes is greater than expected under a model without gene flow [8].

In recent years, findings of

Statistical approaches to inferring gene flow

Figure 2 shows a graphical model that represents an ancestral population that split, at a specific point in time, into two populations, after which there might have been gene exchange in one or both directions. The model can be represented in mathematical terms by six parameters, including the effective population sizes of the ancestral and descendant populations (NA, and N1 and N2, respectively), the splitting time (t), and two gene-flow parameters (m1 and m2). Called the ‘isolation with

An example from chimpanzees

Figure 3 shows examples of migration parameter curves for the central and western subspecies of common chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes troglodytes and Pan troglodytes verus, respectively [26]. In the case of gene flow from P. t. troglodytes to P. t. verus, the curve has a peak near zero, and the probability of the peak is very near to what the probability is at zero. In this case, we cannot reject a migration rate of zero. However, in the reverse direction, the peak is far from zero, and the

Separate migration rates for different genes

A variation on the basic six-parameter method is to fit a model in which every locus in the dataset is provided with a pair of gene-flow parameters [30]. This model can explicitly incorporate the differential gene flow that is expected if gene flow and divergence are both occurring. Bull et al. [31] studied two of the three Heliconius species (Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene) studied by Kronforst et al. [28], and also found evidence for gene flow. However, in this case, by running a

Conclusions: understanding speciation

These recent findings of gene flow between divergent populations and species seem to suggest that gene flow is a common feature of the early stages of the divergence process. This is surprising for two reasons. First, these examples come not from populations that have recently separated but from different populations or species that have been clearly identified on the basis of divergence. Second, it has at times been claimed that gene flow is rare or non-existent between populations that

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (39)

  • J.H. Degnan et al.

    Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process

    Evolution Int J Org Evolution

    (2005)
  • N. Takahata

    The coalescent in two partially isolated diffusion populations

    Genet Res

    (1988)
  • Edwards SV, Kingan SB, Calkins JD, Balakrishnan CN, Jennings WB, Swanson WJ, Sorenson MD: Speciation in birds: genes,...
  • S. Wright

    Evolution in Mendelian populations

    Genetics

    (1931)
  • J. Maynard Smith

    Sympatric speciation

    Am Nat

    (1966)
  • J.A. Endler

    Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines

    (1977)
  • W.R. Rice et al.

    Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years

    Evolution Int J Org Evolution

    (1993)
  • J.C. Avise

    Systematic value of electrophoretic data

    Syst Zool

    (1975)
  • P. Pamilo et al.

    Relationships between gene trees and species trees

    Mol Biol Evol

    (1988)
  • J. Hey

    The structure of genealogies and the distribution of fixed differences between DNA sequence samples from natural populations

    Genetics

    (1991)
  • J. Wakeley et al.

    Estimating ancestral population parameters

    Genetics

    (1997)
  • C.A. Machado et al.

    The causes of phylogenetic conflict in a classic Drosophila species group

    Proc Biol Sci

    (2003)
  • D. Bachtrog et al.

    Extensive introgression of mitochondrial DNA relative to nuclear genes in the Drosophila yakuba species group

    Evolution Int J Org Evolution

    (2006)
  • A. Llopart et al.

    Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea

    Genetics

    (2005)
  • K.L. Shaw

    Conflict between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies of a recent species radiation: what mtDNA reveals and conceals about modes of speciation in Hawaiian crickets

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2002)
  • I. Emelianov et al.

    Genomic evidence for divergence with gene flow in host races of the larch budmoth

    Proc Biol Sci

    (2004)
  • T.L. Turner et al.

    Genomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae

    PLoS Biol

    (2005)
  • M.A. Noor et al.

    Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2001)
  • L.H. Rieseberg

    Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation

    Trends Ecol Evol

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text