Elsevier

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volume 77, Issue 2, February 2013, Pages 233-240
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Original article
Clinical endoscopy
Difficult diagnosis of celiac disease: diagnostic accuracy and utility of chromo-zoom endoscopy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.036Get rights and content

Background

Chromo-zoom endoscopy has been demonstrated to be valuable in assessing the degree of intestinal villous atrophy in patients with suspected celiac disease.

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of chromo-zoom endoscopy in patients with difficult diagnosis because of nonconcordant test results and/or the confounding of a gluten-free diet initiated before an appropriate diagnosis of celiac disease and to compare the findings to a recent reference standard, the in vitro gliadin challenge test.

Design

Prospective, case-control study.

Setting

Tertiary-care referral hospital.

Patients

Patients without celiac disease (negative control group, n = 9), patients with celiac disease (positive control group, n = 41), and patients with difficult diagnosis (n = 27).

Intervention

Chromo-endoscopy with indigo carmine and endoscopic zoom-magnification were performed. Duodenal fragments were collected for the in vitro gliadin challenge test. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used for statistical analyses on accuracy.

Main Outcome Measurements

Diagnostic accuracy of chromo-zoom endoscopy for detection of mucosal abnormalities in patients with difficult diagnosis.

Results

Chromo-zoom endoscopy had a high accuracy for celiac disease diagnosis in analyses on negative controls and positive controls (area under roc = 0.99). In the difficult diagnosis group, the accuracy of chromo-zoom endoscopy was lower (area under roc = 0.83), but it increased after exclusion of patients with celiac disease on gluten-free diet (area under roc = 0.88).

Limitations

There was a 4% failure rate in the ability to cultivate biopsies. Also, the study was done at an academic medical center.

Conclusion

Chromo-zoom endoscopy has high accuracy for cases of difficult diagnosis of celiac disease but only in untreated patients with celiac disease.

Section snippets

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of zoom-endoscopy combining with indigo carmine dye spray in the direct evaluation of duodenal villi in patients with a difficult diagnosis and to compare the findings with a recent reference standard, which is the in vitro gliadin challenge test.

Study design

The accuracy of chromo-zoom endoscopy was evaluated in patients in whom CD had been excluded (negative controls), in patients with serology-proven and biopsy-proven CD (positive controls), and in cases in which the diagnosis of CD was difficult (Fig. 1).

Patients

Three groups of patients were recruited at the CD center, Gastroenterology Unit, at the University of Naples Federico II, and included in this study: a negative control group, a positive control group, and a difficult diagnosis group. The

Demographic characteristics

A total of 80 patients were enrolled in the study. Two were excluded for contamination of samples and another for inadequate (superficial) biopsy samples. Table 2 shows the sex, age, anthropometry, and clinical features of the participants.

Sex and age had a similar distribution among the difficult diagnosis, the negative control, and the positive control groups (Fisher exact test 0.27; P = .93 and analysis of variance P = .30, respectively). Serum a-tTG values averaged in the normal range in

Discussion

Our results confirm that the chromo-zoom endoscopy has a high accuracy in the identification of untreated patients with CD and negative controls. The novel finding of our study was that chromo-zoom endoscopy is highly accurate for diagnosing difficult cases of CD with high specificity and high sensitivity; however, this applies only to patients on a normal gluten-containing diet.

Currently, the criterion standard for the diagnosis of CD remains in the histologic demonstration of the

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to Dr Vincenzo Bruno for technical support, to Mrs Imma Di Palma and Mrs Speranza Iovino for their nursing assistance, and to Mrs Piantedosi for secretarial assistance.

References (30)

Cited by (16)

  • New perspectives on the diagnosis of adulthood coeliac disease

    2021, Coeliac Disease and Gluten-Related Disorders
  • A comparison study between Magniview and high definition white light endoscopy in detecting villous atrophy and coeliac disease: A single centre pilot study

    2018, Digestive and Liver Disease
    Citation Excerpt :

    Sensitivities and specificities in identifying mucosal atrophy in coeliac disease patients for different techniques vary, as do the strengths and limitations. However, the majority of these studies were performed in high prevalence populations by expert endoscopists and therefore lack the external validity to enter widespread use [16–37]. More recently we have demonstrated that high definition white light endoscopy with or without I-scan (which uses digital enhancement technology to enhance the mucosa), increases the detection of coeliac disease during routine endoscopy [18,19,21,23,26,27,29,38].

  • Kiwifruit Peptides, Gastrointestinal Protection, and Oxidative Stress

    2017, Gastrointestinal Tissue: Oxidative Stress and Dietary Antioxidants
  • High-definition and high-magnification endoscopes

    2014, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    Citation Excerpt :

    A recent article reported on the utility of magnification endoscopy combined with indigo carmine chromoendoscopy in celiac disease. It showed increased accuracy of diagnosis in a subgroup of patients with difficult-to-diagnose disease as long as they were treatment naive.41 HD and high-magnification endoscopy have been examined as tools to enhance detection and classification of colonic neoplasia, including flat or depressed lesions.

  • Narrow band imaging combined with water immersion technique in the diagnosis of celiac disease

    2014, Digestive and Liver Disease
    Citation Excerpt :

    If the site of mucosal damage could be certainly identified prior to obtaining the specimen, this would minimize the number of biopsies for histological evaluation, reduce the invasiveness of the endoscopic procedure itself and save time and resources. During the last decade, several authors have attempted to address this issue through new endoscopic techniques, such as water immersion technique (WTI), chromoendoscopy, high-resolution magnification endoscopy, optical coherence tomography, narrow band imaging (NBI) endoscopy or a combination of two of these [8–13]. Despite important studies published in the recent literature, none of these techniques has been widely applied so far in clinical practice.

View all citing articles on Scopus

If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Iovino at [email protected].

DISCLOSURE: The following authors disclosed a financial relationship: Drs Russo and Ciacci received support for this study from the Italian Research Program (PRIN 2006) and by Regione Campania, Assessorato Sanità. None of the funders had any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. No other financial relationships relevant to this publication were disclosed.

View full text