Original contributionTissues from population-based cancer registries: a novel approach to increasing research potential
Introduction
Population-based cancer registries offer a unique potential to generate and test new hypotheses regarding cancer incidence and survival. In the 1960s and 1970s, population-based cancer registries, such as the Hawaii Tumor Registry, were fundamental to epidemiological research comparing cancer rates among various ethnic and racial groups. Migrant studies demonstrated the dominance of environmental (promotional) factors to cancer risk among genetically homogeneous populations [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Rates of breast and colon cancers rose dramatically among successive generations of Japanese in the United States, suggesting that changes in diet and other lifestyle behaviors may be important etiologic determinants [5]. These and other observations provided the impetus for the creation of a national program of population-based cancer registries, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Program, whose purpose was to assess cancer patterns in the United States.
The SEER Program was an outgrowth of 2 earlier National Cancer Institute (NCI) programs, the National Cancer Survey and the End-Results Program, and was mandated through the National Cancer Act in 1971 [6]. The SEER Program has several goals, chief among which are (1) determining cancer incidence and monitoring cancer trends in selected geographic areas of the United States regarding demographic and social characteristics of the population; (2) estimating cancer incidence for the United States on an annual basis; (3) determining the survival experience for cancer patients and monitoring cancer survival trends with respect to type of cancer, extent of disease, therapy, and demographic, socioeconomic, and other parameters of prognostic importance; (4) identifying cancer risk/protective factors through special studies that disclose groups of the population at high or low risks (these groups may be defined by social, occupational, environmental, dietary, or other characteristics); and (5) identifying factors related to patient survival through special studies of referral patterns, diagnostic procedures, treatment methods, and other aspects of medical care.
The SEER Program presently covers 26% of the United States' population, nearly 74 million people [7]. Use of SEER data have led to a rich history of publications, ranging from ecological and observational studies to cohort and record linkage studies. A list of these publications may be found at the SEER website, http://www.seer.cancer.gov/. The SEER Program is the bedrock of data concerning cancer at the population level in the United States. Other countries have similar programs, but genetic, environmental, and health-care differences pose obstacles to translating findings from these programs to other countries. It is essential that large molecular epidemiology studies be validated in a relevant health-care environment. In this article, we describe an expanded use for SEER and other registries that take advantage of their population basis for cancer tissue collection to support molecular epidemiology (Fig. 1). Population-based tissue banks provide an essential resource for testing new molecular classification schemes of cancer that will augment the pathomorphological approach used presently. Properly annotated SEER-derived tissues will be less influenced by bias associated with tissue collections derived from populations with heterogeneous genetic and environmental backgrounds. As these high throughput assays become cheaper and are applied to larger sets of samples, it is optimal that truly representative collections of tumor tissue are available for testing and validating novel assays. By using new technologies for evaluation of tissue through tissue microarrays (TMAs), it will be possible to assess multiple genetic and protein differences among tumors that can be used for diagnostic and prognostic markers. This information can be rapidly disseminated nationally for the identification and care of cancer patients.
Section snippets
Population-based tissue repositories
In 2001, the SEER Program provided supplementation of the Hawaii, Iowa, and Los Angeles County registry contracts to gather tissue from cancer cases within these geographic areas. The Hawaii experience in the development of the first population-based TMA for colorectal cancer is described in our companion article [8].
The objective of population-based cancer registries is to provide surveillance of all new cancer cases occurring in a defined population. This is in contrast with the traditional
Tissue microarrays
A pathologist usually examines tissue removed for diagnostic or treatment purposes. Only a portion of this tissue is generally needed for the examination and the remainder is archived for future use or subsequently discarded. Recent advances in the fields of genomics and proteomics highlight the need for high-throughput technologies that allow for the screening of large numbers of molecular targets for etiologic, diagnostics, or prognostic purposes [13]. The majority of archived tissue in
Unique uses of population-based repositories
Population-based tissue accession is crucial to understanding the complexity of the biologic basis for tumor development and progression, the public health impact of prognostic markers, and the effectiveness of therapeutic targets and new modalities (Table 2). In the examination of prostate cancer progression markers, Bubendorf et al [21] used TMAs to assay different gene amplifications by FISH. In just 5 FISH experiments, the investigators were able to screen material from 371 specimens with 5
Types of assays currently available
Methodologies for the use of TMAs are advancing rapidly, but in theory all assays available for routine tissue analysis can be performed with the TMA format, including laser capture microdissection [34]. The detection of protein antigens using immunohistochemistry is the most common use of the TMA format [22]. Population-based TMAs are ideally suited to studies of molecular and cytogenetic changes associated with particular malignancies. Probes for cytogenetic chromosomal abnormalities and
Establishing a central tissue repository
In establishing a central tissue repository, it is necessary to develop the capacity and infrastructure to conduct tissue collection, storage, cataloguing, data linkage, processing, and distribution activities. During the planning stages, it is necessary to work closely with central cancer registry personnel to ensure complete disease reporting and compliance with state and federal regulations. Once some basic financial support is obtained, the first step in this process is to obtain approval
Administration of the tissue repository
It is critical that both scientific and ethics committees be formed to oversee the activities of the cancer registry tissue repository and to approve requests for tissue.
Ethical issues
Careful consideration of ethical and legal issues regarding the appropriate confidentiality safeguards and protection of anonymity is an essential first step in the establishment of a cancer registry tissue repository [38], [39]. Although the importance of protecting the identity of all persons cannot be overemphasized, the strength of a population-based cancer registry repository lies in the availability of demographic, clinical, and risk factor information associated with each tissue
Funding
At present, NCI funding is limited to procurement of the tissue and maintenance of the resource. A charge-back system has been developed to compensate the local registries for specimen handling and preparation, pathologist time, special staining and sectioning, and construction of the TMA. These charges are reasonable and are meant to cover the costs of the research projects. We anticipate that users of the repository will be able to compete successfully for extramural funding on a local and
Conclusion
The introduction of population-based TMAs and tissue repositories based on existing SEER data collection are an opportunity to move molecular epidemiology forward. Only with true population-based tissue collection can the impact of new biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer be determined. Future uses of a population-based cancer registry tissue repository will only be limited by the small amounts of available tissue and the validity and reproducibility of novel tests. TMAs are an
References (39)
- et al.
Association of diet and place of birth with stomach cancer incidence in Hawaii Japanese and Caucasians
Am J Clin Nutr
(1981) - et al.
CK20 and CK7 protein expression in colorectal cancer: demonstration of the utility of a population-based tissue microarray
Hum Path
(2005) - et al.
Tissue microarrays for rapid linking of molecular changes to clinical endpoints
Am J Pathol
(2001) - et al.
Validation of tissue microarrays for immunohistochemical profiling of cancer specimens using the example of human fibroblastic tumors
Am J Pathol
(2001) - et al.
Large scale molecular analysis identifies genes with altered expression in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma
Am J Pathol
(2002) Changing incidence of breast cancer in Japanese-American women
J Natl Cancer Inst
(1973)Cancer patterns of four ethnic groups in Hawaii
J Natl Cancer Inst
(1980)Cancer incidence among Filipinos in Hawaii and the Philippines
NCI Monogr
(1985)- et al.
Cancer patterns among migrant and native born Japanese in Hawaii in relation to smoking, drinking, and dietary habits
- et al.
The surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results program: a national resource
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
(1999)