Elsevier

Human Pathology

Volume 36, Issue 7, July 2005, Pages 812-820
Human Pathology

Original contribution
Tissues from population-based cancer registries: a novel approach to increasing research potential

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2005.03.010Get rights and content

Summary

Population-based cancer registries, such as those included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Program, offer tremendous research potential beyond traditional surveillance activities. We describe the expansion of SEER registries to gather formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from cancer patients on a population basis. Population-based tissue banks have the advantage of providing an unbiased sampling frame for evaluating the public health impact of genes or protein targets that may be used for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes in defined communities. Such repositories provide a unique resource for testing new molecular classification schemes for cancer, validating new biologic markers of malignancy, prognosis and progression, assessing therapeutic targets, and measuring allele frequencies of cancer-associated genetic polymorphisms or germline mutations in representative samples. The assembly of tissue microarrays will allow for the use of rapid, large-scale protein-expression profiling of tumor samples while limiting depletion of this valuable resource. Access to biologic specimens through SEER registries will provide researchers with demographic, clinical, and risk factor information on cancer patients with assured data quality and completeness. Clinical outcome data, such as disease-free survival, can be correlated with previously validated prognostic markers. Furthermore, the anonymity of the study subject can be protected through rigorous standards of confidentiality. SEER-based tissue resources represent a step forward in true, population-based tissue repositories of tumors from US patients and may serve as a foundation for molecular epidemiology studies of cancer in this country.

Introduction

Population-based cancer registries offer a unique potential to generate and test new hypotheses regarding cancer incidence and survival. In the 1960s and 1970s, population-based cancer registries, such as the Hawaii Tumor Registry, were fundamental to epidemiological research comparing cancer rates among various ethnic and racial groups. Migrant studies demonstrated the dominance of environmental (promotional) factors to cancer risk among genetically homogeneous populations [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Rates of breast and colon cancers rose dramatically among successive generations of Japanese in the United States, suggesting that changes in diet and other lifestyle behaviors may be important etiologic determinants [5]. These and other observations provided the impetus for the creation of a national program of population-based cancer registries, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Program, whose purpose was to assess cancer patterns in the United States.

The SEER Program was an outgrowth of 2 earlier National Cancer Institute (NCI) programs, the National Cancer Survey and the End-Results Program, and was mandated through the National Cancer Act in 1971 [6]. The SEER Program has several goals, chief among which are (1) determining cancer incidence and monitoring cancer trends in selected geographic areas of the United States regarding demographic and social characteristics of the population; (2) estimating cancer incidence for the United States on an annual basis; (3) determining the survival experience for cancer patients and monitoring cancer survival trends with respect to type of cancer, extent of disease, therapy, and demographic, socioeconomic, and other parameters of prognostic importance; (4) identifying cancer risk/protective factors through special studies that disclose groups of the population at high or low risks (these groups may be defined by social, occupational, environmental, dietary, or other characteristics); and (5) identifying factors related to patient survival through special studies of referral patterns, diagnostic procedures, treatment methods, and other aspects of medical care.

The SEER Program presently covers 26% of the United States' population, nearly 74 million people [7]. Use of SEER data have led to a rich history of publications, ranging from ecological and observational studies to cohort and record linkage studies. A list of these publications may be found at the SEER website, http://www.seer.cancer.gov/. The SEER Program is the bedrock of data concerning cancer at the population level in the United States. Other countries have similar programs, but genetic, environmental, and health-care differences pose obstacles to translating findings from these programs to other countries. It is essential that large molecular epidemiology studies be validated in a relevant health-care environment. In this article, we describe an expanded use for SEER and other registries that take advantage of their population basis for cancer tissue collection to support molecular epidemiology (Fig. 1). Population-based tissue banks provide an essential resource for testing new molecular classification schemes of cancer that will augment the pathomorphological approach used presently. Properly annotated SEER-derived tissues will be less influenced by bias associated with tissue collections derived from populations with heterogeneous genetic and environmental backgrounds. As these high throughput assays become cheaper and are applied to larger sets of samples, it is optimal that truly representative collections of tumor tissue are available for testing and validating novel assays. By using new technologies for evaluation of tissue through tissue microarrays (TMAs), it will be possible to assess multiple genetic and protein differences among tumors that can be used for diagnostic and prognostic markers. This information can be rapidly disseminated nationally for the identification and care of cancer patients.

Section snippets

Population-based tissue repositories

In 2001, the SEER Program provided supplementation of the Hawaii, Iowa, and Los Angeles County registry contracts to gather tissue from cancer cases within these geographic areas. The Hawaii experience in the development of the first population-based TMA for colorectal cancer is described in our companion article [8].

The objective of population-based cancer registries is to provide surveillance of all new cancer cases occurring in a defined population. This is in contrast with the traditional

Tissue microarrays

A pathologist usually examines tissue removed for diagnostic or treatment purposes. Only a portion of this tissue is generally needed for the examination and the remainder is archived for future use or subsequently discarded. Recent advances in the fields of genomics and proteomics highlight the need for high-throughput technologies that allow for the screening of large numbers of molecular targets for etiologic, diagnostics, or prognostic purposes [13]. The majority of archived tissue in

Unique uses of population-based repositories

Population-based tissue accession is crucial to understanding the complexity of the biologic basis for tumor development and progression, the public health impact of prognostic markers, and the effectiveness of therapeutic targets and new modalities (Table 2). In the examination of prostate cancer progression markers, Bubendorf et al [21] used TMAs to assay different gene amplifications by FISH. In just 5 FISH experiments, the investigators were able to screen material from 371 specimens with 5

Types of assays currently available

Methodologies for the use of TMAs are advancing rapidly, but in theory all assays available for routine tissue analysis can be performed with the TMA format, including laser capture microdissection [34]. The detection of protein antigens using immunohistochemistry is the most common use of the TMA format [22]. Population-based TMAs are ideally suited to studies of molecular and cytogenetic changes associated with particular malignancies. Probes for cytogenetic chromosomal abnormalities and

Establishing a central tissue repository

In establishing a central tissue repository, it is necessary to develop the capacity and infrastructure to conduct tissue collection, storage, cataloguing, data linkage, processing, and distribution activities. During the planning stages, it is necessary to work closely with central cancer registry personnel to ensure complete disease reporting and compliance with state and federal regulations. Once some basic financial support is obtained, the first step in this process is to obtain approval

Administration of the tissue repository

It is critical that both scientific and ethics committees be formed to oversee the activities of the cancer registry tissue repository and to approve requests for tissue.

Ethical issues

Careful consideration of ethical and legal issues regarding the appropriate confidentiality safeguards and protection of anonymity is an essential first step in the establishment of a cancer registry tissue repository [38], [39]. Although the importance of protecting the identity of all persons cannot be overemphasized, the strength of a population-based cancer registry repository lies in the availability of demographic, clinical, and risk factor information associated with each tissue

Funding

At present, NCI funding is limited to procurement of the tissue and maintenance of the resource. A charge-back system has been developed to compensate the local registries for specimen handling and preparation, pathologist time, special staining and sectioning, and construction of the TMA. These charges are reasonable and are meant to cover the costs of the research projects. We anticipate that users of the repository will be able to compete successfully for extramural funding on a local and

Conclusion

The introduction of population-based TMAs and tissue repositories based on existing SEER data collection are an opportunity to move molecular epidemiology forward. Only with true population-based tissue collection can the impact of new biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer be determined. Future uses of a population-based cancer registry tissue repository will only be limited by the small amounts of available tissue and the validity and reproducibility of novel tests. TMAs are an

References (39)

  • United States cancer statistics: 1999 incidence

    (2002)
  • M.S. Pepe et al.

    Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2001)
  • A. Nocito et al.

    Tissue microarrays (TMAs) for high-throughput molecular pathology research

    Int J Cancer

    (2001)
  • R.M. Giusti et al.

    A twofold increase in BRCA mutation related prostate cancer among Ashkenazi Israelis is no associated with distinctive pathology

    J Med Genet

    (2003)
  • A. Fritz et al.

    International classification of disease for oncology

    (2000)
  • D.L. Rimm et al.

    Tissue microarray: a new technology for amplification of tissue resources

    Cancer J

    (2001)
  • J. Kononen et al.

    Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens

    Nat Med

    (1998)
  • R.L. Camp et al.

    Validation of tissue microarray technology in breast carcinoma

    Lab Invest

    (2000)
  • M. Geiszt et al.

    NAD(P)H oxidase 1, a product of differentiated colon epithelial cells, can partially replace glycoprotein 91phox in the regulated production of superoxide by phagocytes

    J Immunol

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text