Patient experience of the triage encounter in a Swedish emergency department
Introduction
Emergency department (ED) triage is widely used in the western world (Fernandes et al., 2005). During the last decades, research on ED triage has focused more on the development of triage scales (Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, 2000a, Gilboy et al., 2003, Manchester Triage Group, 2006, Bullard et al., 2008) and less on patient perspective of the triage process (Topacoglu et al., 2004).
Section snippets
Background
Since the development of the Australasian Triage Scale in the 1990s (Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, 2000b), three other major scales have been introduced worldwide (Gilboy et al., 2003, Manchester Triage Group, 2006, Bullard et al., 2008). Only the Manchester Triage System (Manchester Triage Group, 2006) has evolved based on the needs of an European emergency unit.
In addition to these scales, local triage scales have been developed in several European countries. Within the
Design
This was a descriptive and observational cross-sectional single site study.
Participants and setting
The Karolinska University Hospital in Solna is a level one trauma centre. The ED treats approximately 70,000 adult patients presenting with non-psychiatric complaints annually. A two-tier triage system is used that includes spot check and comprehensive triage. The triage decisions are based on a five level triage scale called Adaptive Process Triage (ADAPT) developed at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg,
Demographic information
A total of 695 patients presented at the ED during the data collection period, of which 601 (87%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of the eligible patients, 165 (28%) were invited to participate in the study, 146 (88%) agreed to participate, of which 83 (59.5%) patients were women. Age ranged from 19 to 97, with a median age of 49.5 years. The majority, 117 (83%) were native Swedish speakers and just over half, 78 (53.1%) were accompanied by someone.
Time issues in the ED
In total, 58.7% of the patients perceived
Discussion
This study aimed to investigate patient experience of ED triage. As many as 76% of the patients either underwent triage shortly after their arrival in the ED (n = 84) or found the time to triage acceptable (n = 25). Since any kind of queue for triage is a potential threat to the safety of the patients, time to triage ought to be kept to a minimum.
Even though it is known that information about time to first doctor assessment is important for patient satisfaction (Björvell and Stieg, 1991, Bruce et
Conclusions
This study presents new information about patient satisfaction with ED triage from a Swedish perspective. Patients were generally satisfied with the reception and care given by the triage nurses. However, one important factor needs to be addressed in the ED, namely the fact that information about the expected waiting time was only communicated to a restricted amount of the patients. One suggestion is to routinely inform patients about their triage level, and their estimated waiting time before
Role of funding sources
There are no financial conflicts of interest in the current study. KG is a member of the national work group of ADAPT. Financial support for this study was given by the Department of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Solna.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Ankie Eriksson, Elin Magnusson and Tamara Barlow, all at the Department of Emergency Medicine at Karolinska University Hospital Solna for collecting data, providing electronic patient record data and language revision respectively. Further, we wish to thank the Department of Emergency Medicine at Karolinska University Hospital Solna for providing financial support for this study.
References (36)
- et al.
Patients’ perceptions of the health care received in an emergency department
Annals of Emergency Medicine
(1991) - et al.
Determinants of patient satisfaction in a large, municipal ED: the role of demographic variables, visit characteristics, and patient perceptions
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
(2000) - et al.
Patient satisfaction in the emergency department: a review of the literature and implications for practice
The Journal of Emergency Medicine
(2004) - et al.
Triage nurses’ decisions using the national triage scale for Australian emergency departments
Accident and Emergency Nursing
(2000) - et al.
Five-level triage: a report from the ACEP/ENA five-level triage task force
Journal of Emergency Nursing
(2005) - et al.
The soterion rapid triage system: evaluation of inter-rater reliability and validity
The Journal of Emergency Medicine
(2006) - et al.
Interactive triage simulator revealed important variability in both process and outcome of emergency triage
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
(2006) - et al.
Effects of actual waiting time, perceived waiting time, information delivery, and expressive quality on patient satisfaction in the emergency department
Annals of Emergency Medicine
(1996) - Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, 2000a. Guidelines on the implementation of the Australasian triage scale...
- Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, 2000b. Policy on the Australasian Triage Scale....