Clostridium difficile in broiler chickens sold at market places in Zimbabwe and their antimicrobial susceptibility
Introduction
Clostridium difficile is recognised as a nosocomial pathogen associated with antimicrobial drug-associated diarrhoea and pseudomembranous colitis in humans (George et al., 1977, George et al., 1978) and the infection is believed to be acquired nosocomially. The antimicrobial agents most frequently associated with Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) include clindamycin, cephalosporins and ampicillin but almost all antibiotics can cause the disease (Mylonakis et al., 2001). More recently, fluoroquinolones were found to be an important risk factor for CDAD (Pepin et al., 2005). C. difficile has also been shown to be an important pathogen causing diarrhoea in humans in communities outside hospital environments (Riley et al., 1991, Riley et al., 1995, Kyne et al., 1998). Incidence and severity of the disease appear to be increasing (McDonald et al., 2006). Moreover, C. difficile is also an important causative agent of diarrhoea in HIV/AIDS patients (Barbut et al., 1997, Willingham et al., 1998). The C. difficile strains associated with diarrhoea and pseudomembranous colitis produce either toxin A (an enterotoxin) or toxin B (a cytotoxin) or both toxins. Some strains do not produce toxins and do not cause the two conditions. C. difficile also appears to be an important cause of enteric disease in other species such as pigs (Songer et al., 2000), dogs (Marks et al., 2002) and horses (Arroyo et al., 2004).
Food animals are an important source of human enteropathogenic micro-organisms and can be spread to humans through consumption of foods of animal origin. In recent studies C. difficile has been isolated from food animals such as poultry and sheep (Al Saif and Brazier, 1996), pigs (Songer et al., 2000, Songer and Anderson, 2006), chickens, goats and cattle (Simango, 2006) and calves (Rodriguez-Palacios et al., 2006). Moreover, molecular typing of C. difficile isolates from calves and humans has shown similarities in PCR ribotypes from the two species including two PCR ribotypes associated with outbreaks of severe disease in humans (Rodriguez-Palacios et al., 2006), suggesting that cattle may be reservoirs of C. difficile for humans. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of C. difficile in live broiler chickens sold at market places in Harare, Zimbabwe.
Section snippets
Collection and processing of specimens
Chicken and soil samples were collected from six market places in high density suburbs in Harare, Zimbabwe, where live broiler chickens were sold by vendors. Some of the broiler chickens sold at the market places were purchased by the vendors from commercial chicken farms ready for sale. Some chickens were purchased as day old chicks and reared at the backyards of the homesteads of the vendors. The other chickens sold at the market places were indigenous chickens brought from rural areas and
Results
C. difficile was isolated in 29.0% of 100 chicken faeces samples and in 22.0% of 100 soil samples (Table 1) which were collected from six market places. C. difficile was isolated from chicken faeces samples collected from five of the six market places and it was isolated from soils collected from four of the six market places. The chickens from Highfield market place, whose faeces were negative for C. difficile, were purchased from one commercial farm by the vendors. Eighteen chicken faeces
Discussion
The present study determined the occurrence of C. difficile in broiler chickens in an urban setting in an attempt to show how chickens sold in the urban community may be reservoirs of this organism. One study carried out in a rural community in Zimbabwe showed that chickens were a major reservoir of C. difficile (Simango, 2006). The results of the present study have shown that a large number (29.0%) of faecal samples of live broiler chickens in an urban area had C. difficile. Soils around the
Acknowledgement
We are grateful for the co-operation received from the chicken vendors at the market places.
References (22)
- et al.
Community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection
Journal of Infection
(1998) - et al.
Diarrhoeal disease due to Clostridium difficile in general practice
Pathology
(1991) Is Clostridium difficile-associated infection a potentially zoonotic and foodborne disease?
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
(2007)Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in the environment in a rural community in Zimbabwe
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
(2006)- et al.
Clostridium difficile: an important pathogen of food animals
Anaerobe
(2006) - et al.
The distribution of Clostridium difficile in the environment of South Wales
Journal of Medical Microbiology
(1996) - et al.
In vitro activity of new quinolones against Clostridium difficile
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
(2001) - et al.
Experimental Clostridium difficile enterocolitis in foals
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
(2004) - et al.
Epidemiology of recurrences or re-infections of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(1997) The diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
(1998)
Identification of Clostridium difficile as a cause of pseudomembranous colitis
British Medical Journal
Cited by (88)
Prevalence and phylogenetic relationship of Clostridioides difficile strains in fresh poultry meat samples processed in different cutting plants
2021, International Journal of Food MicrobiologyMolecular epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of Clostridioides difficile detected in chicken, soil and human samples from Zimbabwe
2020, International Journal of Infectious DiseasesCitation Excerpt :It is important to note that the RT distribution differs significantly between different continents: In East Asia, RT017 is frequently detected, which is rarely found in other regions of the world. In contrast, in North America, Europe, Australia and other parts of Asia, RTs such as RT001, RT014 and RT027 are prevalent strains (Davies et al., 2016; Knight et al., 2015; Collins et al., 2013; Tickler et al., 2014; Davies et al., 2014). In Africa, however, C. difficile infection (CDI) is a largely neglected disease, and epidemiological data on the pathogen are scarce (Becker et al., 2015).