Impact of mecA promoter mutations on mecA expression and β-lactam resistance levels

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2008.01.015Get rights and content

Abstract

The reason for the extremely low-level oxacillin resistance in a so-called ‘drug clone’, a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus circulating among injection drug users in Zurich, Switzerland, could be traced back to the mecA promoter sequence and particularly to the strain's genetic background. Sequencing of its mec complex identified a point mutation (TATACT to TATATT), creating a perfect palindrome in the −10 region of the mecA promoter/operator region containing the binding sites for the mecA repressors MecI and BlaI. Two strains with vastly different β-lactam resistance phenotypes, the low-level resistant drug clone type strain CHE482 and the highly homogeneously resistant strain COLn, were cured of their SCCmec elements and subsequently transformed with plasmids containing mecA under the control of either the wild-type or mutant promoter. Expression studies showed that this mutation had significant effects on both mecA transcription and corresponding PBP2a production, but only small effects on β-lactam resistance levels within a given genetic background. A further mutation in the mecA ribosomal binding site (GGAGG to GGAGT), common to SCCmec type IV strains, was found to have no discernable effect on mecA transcription and PBP2a content, and only minimal effects on β-lactam resistance. Factors associated with the genetic backgrounds into which these differently controlled mecA genes were introduced had a much higher impact on β-lactam resistance levels than the rates of mecA transcription. The tight repression of mecA expression in this drug clone in the absence of β-lactams could contribute to the apparent fitness of this fast growing strain.

Introduction

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can express highly variable levels of β-lactam resistance. Oxacillin minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) can vary from as low as 1 μg ml–1 up to values over 1000 μg ml–1. Extremely low-level resistant MRSA strains are dangerous as they often evade phenotypic detection. While they appear phenotypically susceptible, these strains still carry the mecA gene which encodes the β-lactam resistance protein penicillin binding protein (PBP) 2a, and express resistance heterogeneously. This means that upon β-lactam exposure they can segregate highly resistant subpopulations, at frequencies well above spontaneous mutation rates, and cause β-lactam treatment failure.

β-Lactam resistance relies on the presence of mecA and the expression of PBP2a; however, several other factors are known to influence resistance. Chromosomal mutations or specific genomic factors are required for expression of high-level resistance (Murakami and Tomasz, 1989; Ryffel et al., 1994). Resistance levels are also influenced by environmental conditions such as temperature, pH, osmolarity, divalent cations, and aerobiosis (Matthews and Steward, 1984). The actual genetic basis governing low-level, heterogeneous, or high homogeneous resistance is unknown.

Expression of mecA is inducible and can be controlled by either its cognate regulators MecI (DNA binding repressor protein) and MecR1 (sensor/signal transducer) or by the structurally and functionally similar β-lactamase regulators BlaI and BlaR1, respectively. Because of structural and functional similarity, both MecI and BlaI can bind as homodimers to the promoter/operator region of both mecA and blaZ (Gregory et al., 1997; Sharma et al., 1998). Repression of transcription by these two inhibitors is even stronger when both repressors are present (Rosato et al., 2003a). In the presence of β-lactams the MecR1/BlaR1 sensor-transducers promote the cleavage of their respective repressors allowing transcription of mecA. In the absence of both regulatory loci, mecA is constitutively expressed.

High conservation of the mecA gene sequence (Chambers, 1997), the promoter region, and the preferred presence of regulatory genes (blaI/blaR1 or mecI/mecR1) (Rosato et al., 2003a) highlights the need for controlled expression of mecA. In strains such as N315, a so-called pre-MRSA (Niemeyer et al., 1996; Weller, 1999), carrying both complete regulatory systems, mecA is repressed by both MecI and BlaI. This tight repression can prevent mecA transcription and lead to inhibition of β-lactam resistance and to the misinterpretation of these strains as methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA).

The amount of PBP2a produced has been shown to have no direct correlation with resistance level; however, mutations in mecA, mecI, the mecI ribosomal binding site, or mecI deletion can lead to increased resistance (Katayama et al., 2004; Rosato et al., 2003a; Niemeyer et al., 1996), whereas interruption of blaR1 results in constitutive repression and therefore decreased resistance (Hackbarth et al., 1994).

An MRSA strain with very low-level oxacillin resistance with the ability to generate highly resistant subclones is spreading among injection drug users in Zurich, Switzerland (Qi et al., 2005). Isolates of this clone having oxacillin MICs of 0.5–4 μg ml–1 are susceptible or just at the breakpoint of resistance for oxacillin, according to CLSI guidelines. They fall within the classification of the recently described OS-MRSA (oxacillin-susceptible, methicillin-resistant S. aureus), defined as being oxacillin-sensitive but mecA-positive strains with MICs of 2 μg ml–1 or below (Hososaka et al., 2007). A recent analysis of the SCCmec element of the drug clone type strain CHE482 identified a composite element carrying a mecB complex (IS1272–ΔmecR1mecA) (Ender et al., 2007). Further investigation of the mec complex revealed that the mecA promoter differed from the consensus by a 1-bp substitution in the −10 region. Here we determined the influence of this nucleotide substitution on mecA transcription and β-lactam resistance levels in different genetic backgrounds, using MRSA cured from their SCCmec element as recipients.

Section snippets

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

All strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Strains were grown in Luria Bertani broth (LB, Difco) at 37 °C, with shaking at 180 rpm. Media were supplemented with 10 μg ml–1 tetracycline for strains harbouring the plasmids pME1, pME2, or pME3, and with 0.8 μg ml–1 ampicillin for those containing the penicillinase plasmids pBla or pI524.

Curing of SCCmec

Strains CHE482 and COLn were cured of SCCmec using the method described by Katayama et al. (2000), resulting in strains ME21 and ME131,

Sequence of CHE482 mecA promoter

The low-level oxacillin-resistant drug clone CHE482 carries a type B mec complex consisting of the mecA gene with a truncated, non-functional regulatory locus. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the mecA gene and the promoter region revealed one single base pair mutation within the mecA promoter consensus sequence. This C-to-T substitution localised in the −10 promoter region, 33-nt upstream of the mecA translational start site, resulted in the formation of a perfect 30-bp palindrome encompassing

Discussion

Genetic factors governing β-lactam resistance levels are still poorly understood. Although it has been shown that there is no direct correlation between levels of mecA expression and levels of methicillin resistance, it has been shown that variable repressor activity, due to mutations in mecI and the mecI promoter, can influence resistance levels (Kuwahara-Arai et al., 1996; Rosato et al., 2003a). Analysis of the mec complex from CHE482 revealed that it contained a novel mecA promoter mutation,

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Grant NF31-105390/1.

References (42)

  • M.C. Enright et al.

    The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2002)
  • S.K. Goda et al.

    A simple procedure for gel electrophoresis and northern blotting of RNA

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (1995)
  • P.D. Gregory et al.

    Studies of repressor (BlaI) of beta-lactamase synthesis in Staphylococcus aureus

    Mol. Microbiol.

    (1997)
  • C.J. Hackbarth et al.

    Altered production of penicillin-binding protein 2a can affect phenotypic expression of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (1994)
  • R. Heusser et al.

    Mosaic staphylococcal cassette chomosome mec (SCCmec) containing two recombinase loci and a new mec complex, B2

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (2007)
  • M. Ip et al.

    Contemporary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in Hong Kong

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (2005)
  • T. Ito et al.

    Novel type V staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec driven by a novel cassette chromosome recombinase, ccrC

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (2004)
  • Y. Katayama et al.

    A new class of genetic element, staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (2000)
  • Y. Katayama et al.

    Effect of disruption of Staphylococcus aureus PBP4 gene on resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics

    Microb. Drug Resist.

    (2003)
  • Y. Katayama et al.

    PBP 2a mutations producing very high-level resistance to beta-lactams

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (2004)
  • Y. Katayama et al.

    Genetic background affects stability of mecA in Staphylococcus aureus

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Emergence of multidrug-resistant sequence type 45 strains among mecA-positive borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus causing bacteraemia in a medical centre in Taiwan

      2018, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
      Citation Excerpt :

      Genetic correlation of all ST45 isolates was further determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using SmaI as the restriction enzyme. Sequence analysis of the mecA gene promoter region of the 64 available BORSA isolates was performed using previously described primers [4]. Quinolone resistance was determined for all ST45 isolates by detecting mutations in gyrA (DNA gyrase) and grlA (topoisomerase IV) using sequencing of PCR amplicons as described previously [16].

    • Antimicrobial susceptibility and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis small colony variants associated with prosthetic joint infection

      2012, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is consistent with what was previously reported by Pourmand et al. (2011) where only 61% of their mecA-positive S. epidermidis isolates (not SCVs) were phenotypically resistant to oxacillin. It is possible that, while mecA is present in these isolates, it is not expressed in some isolates, perhaps as a result of repressor mechanisms such as have been described for S. aureus (Ender et al., 2008; Hososaka et al., 2007). The enhanced biofilm-forming capacity (compared to non-SCV phenotypes) previously described for laboratory-derived menadione auxotrophs of S. aureus (Singh et al., 2009, 2010) was not observed among most of the clinical S. epidermidis SCVs tested, at least using the assay studied.

    • Selection of resistance at lethal and non-lethal antibiotic concentrations

      2012, Current Opinion in Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Otherwise we risk missing identifying and examining mutations that are significant for resistance development in real life. In support of this notion is the increasing evidence that small effect (and sometimes transient) mutations are important in resistance development [34–37,38•,39]. Using standardized measures, such as minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) or zones of inhibition, one can define and quantify differences in susceptibility between wild-type and mutant strains.

    • Detection and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in healthy dogs in La Rioja, Spain

      2011, Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although, in the present study, the mecA expression levels were not investigated, it is important to underline the presence/absence of mecA regulatory elements relative to the phenotype of resistance to β-lactams in our MRSP strains. It has been suggested that a tight repression of mecA gene expression in the absence of β-lactams could contribute to the apparent fitness of successful strains in S. aureus [37], which might be also the case in the successfully spread of ST71-MRSP lineage. It is of interest that regardless of the fact that all 196 sampled dogs were healthy, all MRSP isolates, independent of their genetic background, harboured the PVL analogous leukocidin genes lukS/F-I, the exfoliative gene siet, and the enterotoxin gene si-ent.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text