Parental awareness of hearing impairment in their school-going children and healthcare seeking behaviour in Kisumu district, Kenya

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.11.007Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Hearing-impaired children who are identified early and appropriately managed have improved outcomes in speech, language, cognitive and social development. Enhanced parental awareness of their child's hearing disability, behavioral, developmental and psychosocial limitations is essential to sustaining timely detection and appropriate intervention. Additionally, availability of services for diagnosis, treatment and habilitation would improve the demand for pedaudiological care in this community.

Objective

To describe level of parental awareness of childhood HI and the pattern of access to and utilization of ambulatory care services.

Subjects

Thirty-three parents of lower primary school-going children who failed audiometric screening from sampled schools in Kisumu district, western Kenya.

Main outcome measures

First person to detect HI, age of child at first suspicion of HI, source of ambulatory health care and use of the health care facilities.

Results

The prevalence of HI was 2.48%. Most parents/guardians (69.7%) were aware of their child's hearing impairment. Of these, 63.6% were first to detect HI in the pupils, while 30.3% were detected by screen. Most children (57.2%) were first recognized with (HI) after age 2 years. The mean age at identification was 5.5 years. The median travel distance to the preferred health care facility was 2 km (IQR 1–2.5). Parents seldom sought or lacked help for their hearing-impaired children. Of 27.3% who asked for hearing assessment, 9.1% received some counsel on HI and 12.1% received medication, one (3%) was referred for audiological assessment and none used a hearing aid. Use of health facilities for maternal care was (65.7%) and immunization (62.9%).

Conclusions

Despite adequate parental awareness of chronic childhood disability, health facilities were underutilized. This indicates the need to further stimulate and maintain a desirable level of uptake of services for diagnosis, treatment and habilitation of childhood HI, while sustaining delivery of effective and acceptable high quality paediatric care.

Introduction

Childhood hearing impairment (HI) is a significant public health condition associated with long-term academic and communicative difficulties. Causes can be congenital or acquired. Nearly half of the known causes can be prevented by primary public health methods [1], [2]. Early identification and prompt intervention are crucial for improved outcomes. Efficient test measures to facilitate early detection of HI are not universally available in the developing countries owing to their high costs and lack of skills [3]. Besides, concerns about their potential benefits to the society, persist [4]. This implies that their application for mass screening cannot be reasonably cost effective [5]. Parental awareness of their child's hearing disability consequently is a valuable primary resource for early detection and intervention.

Early identification of childhood hearing impairment (defined as identification by 6 months after birth) and appropriate intervention is critical for normal speech, language, cognitive and social development [6], [7], [8]. Screening/surveillance tests and systems for children are essential primary public health strategies whose aims would be: to ensure all children have opportunity to realize their full potential in terms of good health, well-being and development; and to identify and manage as early as possible remediable disorders to minimize their impact [1]. In developing countries early detection poses significant practical challenge. Many pediatric health care providers feel inadequately trained in assessing children's developmental status, or are often too busy to conduct the elaborate developmental screening tests during the regular clinics [9]. The level of parental involvement, quality, quantity and timing of care services children receive are essential to their psychosocial and academic development and ultimately the quality of life they achieve [10], [11], [12]. Although the severity of HI relates inversely to the age at detection, less is known of the bearing of socioeconomic status and demographic factors on the age of diagnosis and the impact of parental awareness on care seeking.

Section snippets

Epidemiology of childhood HI

The prevalence of childhood HI varies widely across different age groups, social classes and even within individuals [13], [14]. It is estimated that about 440 million children worldwide have hearing loss above 85 decibels (dB) but this increases to about 800 million when threshold is reduced to 50 dB. In Kenya, the mean prevalence of childhood HI varies between 2.3% and 5.6% [3], [15]. The actual prevalence of mild and moderate HI is difficult to assess because test environments typically have

Study area

The study was carried out in Kisumu district in western Kenya. It covers an area of 918.55 km2 within the Lake Basin on the Winam Gulf with a population of 539,966 [37], [38]. Poor infrastructure is a major concern affecting socioeconomic activities in the district. The main economic activity is subsistence agriculture and service industries. Leading causes of childhood morbidity include malaria, acute respiratory illnesses, diarrhea diseases and anemia. There are 49 health facilities, most of

Demographic characteristics

Of the pupils screened, 2.48% (35/1411) had hearing impairment (BEHL0.5–4 kHz  25 dB HL) in either one or both ears. Their age range was 6–14 years while the mean age was 9.5 (S.D. 2.21) compared to 8.7 years (S.D. 1.34) of the target population (t = 12.903, p = 0.001). Nearly half (57.1%) resided in the periurban zone, while 65.7% were from low socioeconomic strata (Table 1). Majority of them (85.7%) had thresholds above 39 dB (Fig. 1). Unilateral moderate to severe hearing impairment (HI) was

Discussion

This current study was carried out in an area of diverse geographical and socioeconomic background. However, majority of the index population was from low socioeconomic strata. The observed HI prevalence of 2.48% is comparable to that reported by Newton et al. [3]. The average detection time was 5.5 years. This prevalence demonstrates a heavy disability burden due to HI, while service provision and use remains dismal.

Most parents were both aware of and the first to suspect the reduced hearing

Conclusion

Childhood hearing impairment is an important problem in this community. While most parents are aware of their children's hearing limitations, they detect them late and their level of service demand and uptake is still low. Prioritizing issues of access to and utilization of the care facilities, the organizational factors and poverty alleviation can harness the benefits of parental awareness for early intervention in ear care programs. Reasons for late identification and lack of demand for care

References (59)

  • P. Ching

    User fees, demand for childre's health care and access across income groups: the Philipine case

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1995)
  • J. Siegrist

    Social differentials in chronic disease: what can sociological knowledge offer to explain and possibly reduce them?

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1995)
  • B. McCormick, Screening and surveillance for hearing impairment in pre-school children, in: A.G. Kerr (General Eds.),...
  • A. Davis

    Epidemiology of hearing impairment

  • P.M. Moeller

    Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing

    Paediatrics

    (2000)
  • C. Yoshinaga-Itano

    Early intervention after universal neonatal hearing screening: impact on outcomes

    Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev.

    (2003)
  • M. Ptok

    Early diagnosis of hearing impairment in children

    Z. Arztl. Fortbild. Qualitatssich.

    (2004)
  • CDC, Internet communications, 2004,...
  • P.H. Dworkin

    Detection of behavioral, developmental and psychosocial problems in pediatric care practice

    Curr. Opin. Pediatr.

    (1993)
  • H.E. Eickel et al.

    Early detection of profound hearing loss in children: result of screening students in Rhine Schools for the Deaf and Hearing Impaired in Cologne

    Laringorhinootologie

    (1998)
  • C. Flexer

    Facilitating Hearing and Listening in Young Children

    (1994)
  • S.D.G. Stephens et al.

    Assessing hearing problems within a community survey

    Br. J. Audiol.

    (1991)
  • A. Davis et al.

    Hearing impairment in children after bacterial meningitis: incidence and resource implications

    Resources

    (1993)
  • Internet Communication, [email protected], Effects of hearing loss, Am. Sp. Lang. Hearing Assoc.,...
  • P.E. Brookhouser

    Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Children

    Pediatr. Clin. N. Am.

    (1996)
  • A.S. Niskar et al.

    Prevalence of hearing loss among children 6–19 years of age. The third National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey

    JAMA (United States)

    (1998)
  • M.J. Mwaura, Hearing Loss in Children at Kenyatta Hospital, MMed. Thesis, University of Nairobi,...
  • E.M. Maki-Torkko et al.

    Aetiology and risk indicators of HI in a one year cohort for 1985–86 in Northern Finland

    Scand. Audiol. (Denmark)

    (1998)
  • K. Van Naarden et al.

    Prevalence and characteristics of children in metropolitan Atlanta

    Paediatrics

    (1999)
  • Cited by (18)

    • State of deaf children in West Bengal, India: What can be done to improve outcome

      2018, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, it is instructive to consider the situation of deaf children in the broader context of other developing countries. For example, studies from South Africa (median age of maternal suspicion and identification of deafness of 18 and 28 months respectively) [31], Brazil (age of suspicion, diagnosis and provision of hearing aid of 1 year and 9 months, 4 years and 3 months and 7 years and 5 months respectively) [32], Nigeria (mean age of parental detection of hearing loss of 2.3 years) [33], Cameroon (mean age of diagnosis of 3.3 years) [34], Kenya (mean age of identification of 5.5 years [35], Mauritius (mean age of identification of 24 months) [36] and Malaysia (in majority of cases, parental suspicion was between 1 and 3 years and diagnosis between 1 and over 3 years of age [37]. Thus, without newborn hearing screening, most developing countries are also substantially missing the benchmark EHDI standards.

    • Field testing a draft version of the UNICEF/Washington Group Module on child functioning and disability. Background, methodology and preliminary findings from Cameroon and India

      2016, Alter
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, older children were also more likely to report some difficulty seeing in India. Previous studies have shown that caregivers may experience difficulty identifying sensory impairments in children at an early age, which may account for the comparatively lower proportions of parental-reported younger children reported to experience sensory limitations (Omondi, Ogol, Otieno, & Macharia, 2007; Rahi, Cumberland, & Peckham, 2010). Further, the reliance on proxy report adds a second dimension of complexity given potential for mis-reporting by caregivers (Eiser & Morse, 2001).

    • The needs of hearing impaired children's parents who attend to auditory verbal therapy-counseling program

      2008, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The level of parental involvement, quality, quantity and timing of care services children receive is essential to their psychosocial and academic development and ultimately the quality of life they achieve [3,4]. Omondi et al. [5] has presented the results of parental awareness of hearing impairment in their school-going children and healthcare seeking behavior. His findings indicate the prospective prime role of parents in surveillance and management of childhood hearing impairment.

    • Introduction: Kinga na kinga ndipo moto huwakapo Disability in Kenya

      2022, Disability and Social Justice in Kenya: Scholars, Policymakers, and Activists in Conversation
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text