Biology contribution
Macrophages From Irradiated Tumors Express Higher Levels of iNOS, Arginase-I and COX-2, and Promote Tumor Growth

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.041Get rights and content

Purpose: To investigate the effects of single and fractionated doses of radiation on tumors and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and to elucidate the potential of TAMs to influence tumor growth.

Methods and Materials: A murine prostate cell line, TRAMP-C1, was grown in C57Bl/6J mice to 4-mm tumor diameter and irradiated with either 25 Gy in a single dose, or 60 Gy in 15 fractions. The tumors were removed at the indicated times and assessed for a variety of markers related to TAM content, activation status, and function.

Results: In tumors receiving a single radiation dose, arginase (Arg-I), and cycloxygenase-2 (COX-2) mRNA expression increased as a small transient wave within 24 h and a larger persistent wave starting after 3 days. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mRNA was elevated only after 3 days and continued to increase up to 3 weeks. After fractionated irradiation, Arg-1 and COX-2 mRNA levels increased within 5 days, whereas iNOS was increased only after 10 fractions of irradiation had been given. Increased levels of Arg-I, COX-2, and, to a lesser extent, iNOS protein were found to associate with TAMs 1–2 weeks after tumor irradiation. Function of TAMs were compared by mixing them with TRAMP-C1 cells and injecting them into mice; TRAMP-C1 cells mixed with TAMs from irradiated tumors appeared earlier and grew significantly faster than those mixed with TAMs from unirradiated tumors or TRAMP-C1 alone.

Conclusions: Tumor-associated macrophages in the postirradiated tumor microenvironment express higher levels of Arg-1, COX-2, and iNOS, and promote early tumor growth in vivo.

Introduction

The microenvironment of normal tissues is altered in response to irradiation so as to be conducive to a healing response. Part of this involves cytokine production leading to recruitment and activation of immune cells (1). Phagocytes and other immune cells infiltrate the irradiated site (2, 3, 4). This response is initiated within hours of exposure, but recurs in a cyclical pattern days to months later (3, 5, 6, 7). For example, irradiation of lungs in mice leads to waves of expression of chemokines (8) and pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin (IL)-1, and infiltration by polymorphonuclear leukocytes, lymphocytes, and macrophages that express markers, indicating their influx from the circulation (2, 4). Although this pattern of response has been observed in several normal tissues, much less is known about how the tumor microenvironment responds to irradiation, in particular with immune cell infiltration, despite its obvious relevance to therapeutic outcome of cancer treatment.

It has been known for many years that tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are a major cellular component of human (9) and murine cancers (10, 11), yet there is still no consensus as to their role in cancer growth and metastasis. This lack of consensus can be reconciled by the hypothesis that they have a double-edged role depending upon whether they have a type 1 (M1) or type 2 (M2) phenotype; the former are able to kill tumor cells, present antigen, and produce immune-stimulatory cytokines, whereas the latter promote angiogenesis, tumor growth, and metastasis, and suppress T-cell function (see review in (12, 13)). The content, phenotype, and function of TAMs are defined by the microenvironment and remain constant over most of the growth period of experimental tumors, if left unperturbed (14). Most TAMs in most tumors express a M2 phenotype, unless manipulated (15).

Reports on the effects of therapy, especially radiation therapy, on TAM number, phenotype and function are rare. Experimental studies indicate that macrophages are relatively radioresistant and that the balance of cell types after noncurative irradiation is initially disturbed, but reestablishes itself with time (16). The time after irradiation when the balance of cell types within the tumor is most perturbed may be the optimal one for therapeutic intervention aimed at boosting tumor immunity, because the tumor burden will be less, radiation may provide some “danger” signaling enhancing antigen presentation, and the balance of cytokines and the redox status may be more favorable for immune cell activation and expression of effector function.

Several pathways can influence the phenotype and function of macrophages, but one that can have a major impact is driven by L-arginine metabolism. L-arginine is metabolized by nitric oxide synthases (NOSs) to form L-citrulline and nitric oxide (NO), which have a variety of biologic effects and in general promote inflammatory and immune reactions (17, 18). However, in contrast, tumor growth can be promoted by depletion of L-arginine by arginase produced by TAMs. This can be mediated by enhanced production of L-ornithine and polyamine, negation of NO-mediated tumor cytotoxicity (19), and appearance of TAMs that suppress T-cell function (20, 21, 22). In this study, we examine the effect of in vivo irradiation on TAM function in murine prostate tumors with particular reference to the arginase pathway. COX-2 expression was also examined because it is linked to control of inflammation, is elevated in prostate cancers, and is associated with increased proliferation, invasiveness, and angiogenesis (23, 24). The hypothesis was that irradiation might affect TAM phenotype and function and this could contribute to or inhibit accelerated tumor growth and repopulation during and after radiation therapy. Our results indicate that the irradiated tumor microenvironment favors the development of a macrophage phenotype that favors tumor growth and indicates the need for further studies aimed at targeting this cell population for improved radiotherapeutic benefit in cancer.

Section snippets

Animals

C57BL/6J mice were purchased from the National Laboratory Center, National Scientific Council, Taiwan. Mice were bred in the animal facility in Chang Gung University. Seven-to-eight-week-old male mice were used for experiments and cared for in accordance with the approved guide for the care and use of laboratory animals by the Commission of Chinese National Laboratory Animal (approval number: CGU03-59).

Cell lines, tumors, and tumor irradiation

The TRAMP-C1 prostate cancer cell line, which was derived from a TRAMP cancer (Transgenic

Growth delay of TRAMP-C1 tumors after irradiation

TRAMP-C1 tumors were irradiated either with a single-dose of 25 Gy or 60 Gy/15 fx/3 weeks or sham-irradiated when 4 mm in diameter. As shown in Fig. 1, irrespective of the irradiation protocol, irradiated tumors were growth delayed by around 1 week compared with control (sham-irradiated) tumors, but did not regress completely.

Inducible nitric oxide synthase, arginase-I, and COX-2 mRNA expression in TRAMP-C1 tumors after a single dose of 25 Gy

At various times after single doses of 25 Gy irradiation, two or three tumors were removed from each group and iNOS, arginase-I (Arg-I), and COX-2 mRNA levels were

Discussion

Macrophages are the major cell type infiltrating many human cancers including ovary, thyroid, breast, lung, kidney, colon, and melanoma; the percentages of TAMs, except for ovary and thyroid cancer, are often more than 50% (9). In a study of 13 murine tumors including 6 sarcomas and 7 carcinomas, TAMs varied greatly and ranged from 9% to 83%, with a mean percentage of 44% and 39%, respectively, for sarcomas and carcinomas (11). TAMs have been implicated in many facets of tumor behavior

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Ching-Jung Lo, Mr Yi-Chen Liu, and Miss Chin-Yi Lee for their help in dosimetry verification, mouse irradiation, and processing of samples.

References (43)

  • E. Nakata et al.

    Potentiation of tumor response to radiation or chemoradiation by selective cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme inhibitors

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2004)
  • W.H. McBride et al.

    A sense of danger from radiation

    Radiat Res

    (2004)
  • J.H. Hong et al.

    Bronchoalveolar lavage and interstitial cells have different roles in radiation-induced lung injury

    Int J Radiat Biol

    (2003)
  • C.S. Chiang et al.

    Delayed molecular responses to brain irradiation

    Int J Radiat Biol

    (1997)
  • J.H. Hong et al.

    Rapid induction of cytokine gene expression in the lung after single and fractionated doses of radiation

    Int J Radiat Biol

    (1999)
  • C.J. Johnston et al.

    Alterations in the expression of chemokine mRNA levels in fibrosis-resistant and -sensitive mice after thoracic irradiation

    Exp Lung Res

    (1998)
  • H.H. van Ravenswaay Claasen et al.

    Tumor infiltrating cells in human cancerOn the possible role of CD16+ macrophages in antitumor cytotoxicity

    Lab Invest

    (1992)
  • W.H. McBride et al.

    The effect of C. parvum therapy on intratumoral macrophage subpopulations

    Adv Exp Med Biol

    (1982)
  • L. Milas et al.

    Macrophage content of murine sarcomas and carcinomas: Associations with tumor growth parameters and tumor radiocurability

    Cancer Res

    (1987)
  • C.E. Lewis et al.

    Distinct role of macrophages in different tumor microenvironments

    Cancer Res

    (2006)
  • R.D. Stout et al.

    Macrophages sequentially change their functional phenotype in response to changes in microenvironmental influences

    J Immunol

    (2005)
  • Cited by (201)

    • Impact of radiation therapy on healthy tissues

      2023, International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology
    • VSIG4-expressing tumor-associated macrophages impair anti-tumor immunity

      2022, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work is supported by NSC93-2314-B-182-030 from National Science Council, Taiwan; CMRPG1001 from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; and SMRPG340021 from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Cancer Center-Terry Fox Foundation. Chi-Shiun Chiang is supported by NSC95-2320-B-007-005. Dr. McBride acknowledges support from the NIH/NCI RO1 CA-101752 and Dept. of Defense #W81XWH-04-1-0126.

    Conflict of interest: none.

    View full text