Reviews and feature article
Critical issues in mucosal immunity for HIV-1 vaccine development

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2008.03.036Get rights and content

Development of a safe and effective vaccine for HIV-1 infection is a critical global priority. However, the nature of host-virus interactions that lead to early immunosuppression and CD4 depletion, HIV-1 diversity, and the inability of the immune system to eliminate the latently infected CD4 pool of cells has to date thwarted successful vaccine development. Moreover, both the initial antibody-inducing vaccine (protein envelope gp120) and cell-mediated vaccine (recombinant adenovirus containing HIV-1 genes) strategies have failed in efficacy trials, and the latter cell-mediated vaccine appeared to have caused enhanced HIV-1 acquisition. Thus basic and translational research to understand why current vaccines have failed and elucidation of new mechanisms of virus control at mucosal surfaces is essential for eventual successful development of a preventive HIV-1 vaccine.

Section snippets

HIV-1 transmission

HIV-1 is remarkably diverse, with a reverse transcriptase enzyme that has a high error rate such that the average HIV-1 genome differs from its parent by at least 1 mutation and results in HIV-1 consisting of quasispecies or a “swarm” of related viruses.8, 9, 10 As a result, HIV-1 has evolved over time into a number of subtypes, or clades, with different clades in different locations worldwide.11 Moreover, HIV-1 can diversify by recombining among virus strains when 2 or more virus strains

The neutralizing antibody problem

A number of rare human mAbs have been isolated from HIV-1–infected patients that indeed do broadly neutralize diverse HIV-1 strains, such as mAbs 2F5 and 4E10 against the gp41 membrane proximal region and mAb 1b12 reactive with the gp120 CD4-binding site.26, 27, 28 HIV-1 envelope constructs made in the laboratory express the binding sites of these antibodies (ie, they are antigenic), but when these HIV envelopes are injected into animals or human subjects, they do not induce broadly

HIV-1 and the latent pool of CD4+ T cells

Because many of the strategies used for successful vaccines have now been tried and failed in the quest for a preventive AIDS vaccine, the field has now turned to more basic and translational research areas to understand what is needed to make a vaccine against an integrating lentivirus and, indeed, to determine whether such a vaccine is possible. Because HIV-1 is an integrating retrovirus that forms a latent pool of infected cells that is sheltered from both antiretroviral therapy and from

The sequence of transmission events at the mucosal surface

Pope and Haase56 have summarized their work and the work of others in defining what are thought to be the HIV-1 transmission events across mucosal surfaces (Fig 2). HIV-1 crosses the mucosal barrier in 2 to 6 hours and, during the first 3 to 6 days, disseminates locally and reaches draining lymph nodes. This might have been even faster if infected cells within an infectious ejaculate can gain entry through genital ulceration, appearing in draining lymph nodes within 24 hours and distal sites

The correlates of immunity to HIV-1 at mucosal surfaces

For induction of sterilizing immunity to HIV-1, most agree that a vaccine must induce anti-HIV-1 neutralizing antibody at mucosal surfaces at the time of transmission, induce cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in mucosal submucosal areas that can rapidly kill virus-infected cells, or a combination of both.62 Unfortunately, in the unvaccinated subject both anti-HIV-1 antibodies and anti-HIV-1 CTLs usually arise too late after transmission to be effective, arising between 20 and 25 days after

The mucosal targets and barriers for HIV-1

The linings of the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts are covered in mucus containing both IgA and IgG that forms a natural protective barrier against pathogen invasion, including HIV-1 virions.17, 71 Natural mucosal defenses to HIV-1 include the production of molecules including α and β defensins72, 73 and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor.74 Although the earliest events controlling viral transmission across intact mucosal surfaces remain controversial,58 genital infections,

What does a successful HIV-1 vaccine need to do?

A successful, sterilizing, preventive AIDS vaccine must induce protective antibodies that are present at the time of transmission at sufficient concentrations to prevent virion movement from the epithelial surface to dendritic cells and induce anti–HIV-1 CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the submucosa. Whether the latent pool of CD4+ T cells is established sufficiently late after transmission to allow time for a memory B-cell response to be effective is not known. That postexposure prophylaxis is not

Summary

A number of difficult obstacles continue to stand in the way of making a successful preventive HIV-1 vaccine, including HIV-1 diversity, the early formation of a latently infected CD4+ T-cell pool, the resulting narrow window of time for a vaccine to induce immune responses that might extinguish the transmitted virus, the inability of current envelope proteins to induce broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 antibodies, and HIV-1 infection of CD4+ T cells and induction of massive CD4 cell death. The

References (85)

  • T. Lopes-Carvalho et al.

    Marginal zone B cells in lymphocyte activation and regulation

    Curr Opin Immunol

    (2005)
  • R.D. Klausner et al.

    Medicine. The need for a global HIV vaccine enterprise

    Science

    (2003)
  • The Global HIV/AIDS Vaccine Enterprise: scientific strategic plan. Coordinating Committee of the Global HIV/AIDS Vaccine Enterprise. The Global HIV/AIDS Vaccine Enterprise: Scientific Strategic Plan

    PLoS Med

    (2005)
  • D. Montefiori et al.

    Antibody-based HIV-1 vaccines: recent developments and future directions

    PLoS Med

    (2007)
  • R.J. Shattock et al.

    Improving defences at the portal of entry: Mucosal and innate immunity (Summary Report from a Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise Working Group)

    PLoS Med

    (2008)
  • R.P. Sekaly

    The failed HIV Merck vaccine study: a step back or a launching point for future vaccine development?

    J Exp Med

    (2008)
  • A. von Bubnoff

    The 15th annual meeting had its share of sobering news from clinical trials, but researchers also reported many exciting advances

    IAVI Rep

    (2008)
  • J.W. Shiver et al.

    Replication-incompetent adenoviral vaccine vector elicits effective anti-immunodeficiency-virus immunity

    Nature

    (2002)
  • B.T. Korber et al.

    Heterogeneity of HIV-1 and HIV-2

    AIDS

    (1995)
  • M. Peeters et al.

    Genetic diversity of HIV in Africa: impact on diagnosis, treatment, vaccine development and trials

    AIDS

    (2003)
  • B. Keele et al.

    Identification of the transmitted HIV-1 envelope

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2008)
  • J. Stebbing et al.

    The clades of HIV: their origins and clinical significance

    AIDS Rev

    (2003)
  • D.L. Robertson et al.

    Recombination in HIV-1

    Nature

    (1995)
  • B. Korber et al.

    Search for the origin of HIV and AIDS

    Science

    (2000)
  • F. Gao et al.

    Origin of HIV-1 in the chimpanzee Pan troglodytes troglodytes

    Nature

    (1999)
  • C.D. Pilcher et al.

    Brief but efficient: acute HIV infection and the sexual transmission of HIV

    J Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • C.D. Pilcher et al.

    Acute HIV revisited: new opportunities for treatment and prevention

    J Clin Invest

    (2004)
  • R.J. Shattock et al.

    Inhibiting sexual transmission of HIV-1 infection

    Nat Rev Microbiol

    (2003)
  • T. Zhu et al.

    Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of HIV-1 patients with primary infection

    Science

    (1993)
  • L. Margolis et al.

    Selective transmission of CCR5-utilizing HIV-1: the “gatekeeper” problem resolved?

    Nat Rev Microbiol

    (2006)
  • B. Gaschen et al.

    Diversity considerations in HIV-1 vaccine selection

    Science

    (2002)
  • F. Gao et al.

    Centralized immunogens as a vaccine strategy to overcome HIV-1 diversity

    Expert Rev Vaccines

    (2004)
  • W. Fischer et al.

    Polyvalent vaccines for optimal coverage of potential T-cell epitopes in global HIV-1 variants

    Nat Med

    (2007)
  • D.C. Nickle et al.

    Coping with viral diversity in HIV vaccine design

    PLoS Comput Biol

    (2007)
  • F. Gao et al.

    Centralized HIV-1 envelope immunogens and neutralizing antibodies

    Curr HIV Res

    (2007)
  • D.R. Burton et al.

    Antibody vs. HIV in a clash of evolutionary titans

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2005)
  • P.D. Kwong et al.

    Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody

    Nature

    (1998)
  • B.F. Haynes et al.

    Aiming to induce broadly reactive neutralizing antibody responses with HIV-1 vaccine candidates

    Expert Rev Vaccines

    (2006)
  • W. Weissenhorn et al.

    Atomic structure of the ectodomain from HIV-1 gp41

    Nature

    (1997)
  • X. Wei et al.

    Antibody neutralization and escape by HIV-1

    Nature

    (2003)
  • P.D. Kwong et al.

    HIV-1 evades antibody-mediated neutralization through conformational masking of receptor-binding sites

    Nature

    (2002)
  • B.F. Haynes et al.

    Cardiolipin polyspecific autoreactivity in two broadly neutralizing HIV-1 antibodies

    Science

    (2005)
  • Cited by (60)

    • Cure of HIV infection: Is the long wait over?

      2014, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
    • Overview of microbicides for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus

      2012, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
    • Molecular investigations into vaginal immunization with HIV gp41 antigenic construct H4A in a quick release solid dosage form

      2012, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The HIV epidemic remains a major global health challenge, with heterosexual transmission accounting for the majority of new infections [1–5]. After transmission, the virus disseminates to the local draining lymph nodes followed by systemic spread within 6–25 days [6,7]. Development of a strong vaginal immunological response is considered an essential component of a female-targeted prophylactic vaccine.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Series editors: Donald Y. M. Leung, MD, PhD, and Dennis K. Ledford, MD

    Supported by National Institutes of Health grant AI-0678501, the Center For HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology (B.H. and R.S.), and Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery (B.H.) and Grand Challenge (R.S.) grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Europrise (R.S.) network of excellence on vaccines and microbicides funded by the European Commission.

    View full text