A classification of errors in lay comprehension of medical documents

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2012.07.012Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Emphasis on participatory medicine requires that patients and consumers participate in tasks traditionally reserved for healthcare providers. This includes reading and comprehending medical documents, often but not necessarily in the context of interacting with Personal Health Records (PHRs). Research suggests that while giving patients access to medical documents has many benefits (e.g., improved patient–provider communication), lay people often have difficulty understanding medical information. Informatics can address the problem by developing tools that support comprehension; this requires in-depth understanding of the nature and causes of errors that lay people make when comprehending clinical documents. The objective of this study was to develop a classification scheme of comprehension errors, based on lay individuals’ retellings of two documents containing clinical text: a description of a clinical trial and a typical office visit note. While not comprehensive, the scheme can serve as a foundation of further development of a taxonomy of patients’ comprehension errors. Eighty participants, all healthy volunteers, read and retold two medical documents. A data-driven content analysis procedure was used to extract and classify retelling errors. The resulting hierarchical classification scheme contains nine categories and 23 subcategories. The most common error made by the participants involved incorrectly recalling brand names of medications. Other common errors included misunderstanding clinical concepts, misreporting the objective of a clinical research study and physician’s findings during a patient’s visit, and confusing and misspelling clinical terms. A combination of informatics support and health education is likely to improve the accuracy of lay comprehension of medical documents.

Highlights

► Taxonomy of errors of lay comprehension of medical documents is feasible. ► This paper offers a classification serving as the beginning of such a taxonomy. ► Content analysis of document retellings is a viable taxonomy building procedure. ► Lay participants had the most trouble with medication names. ► Other difficulties concerned clinical concepts, terms, findings and research aims.

Keywords

Information literacy
Clinical documentation
Consumer health
Patients
Classification
Content analysis

Cited by (0)