Short communication3D reconstruction of the ribs from lateral and frontal X-rays in comparison to 3D CT-scan reconstruction
Introduction
A three-dimensional (3D) patient-specific geometrical model of the ribs is essential for clinical evaluation in scoliosis (Dubousset et al., 2003; Labelle et al., 1995), a complex 3D deformation of the trunk. Patients with scoliosis often require conservative intervention in the form of orthotic braces. In these patients, information about rib shape and length asymmetry would provide a better understanding of mechanisms underlying the relationship between the rib curvature and vertebral rotation (Erkula et al., 2003), leading to a better brace design. Patient-specific biomechanical finite element models have been developed to predict the outcome of orthopaedic treatment. These models require ribs geometry (Aubin et al., 1995; Le Borgne et al., 1998). The 3D information could be obtained by CT scan, but with a high-radiation dose for the patient. In the specific case of the ribs, a method based on two frontal X-rays (conventional frontal and frontal, with a 20° angle from the horizontal) was previously developed (Dansereau and Stokes, 1988) and evaluated to assess in vivo geometric measurement variability (Labelle et al., 1995). A method based on three X-rays (same to as Dansereau and Stokes (1988) plus a lateral one) was used to model the spine, ribs (Cheriet et al., 2007) and the spine, ribs and pelvis in 3D (Delorme et al., 2003). In these previous studies, the incidence angles of the X-rays were not the ones most often used clinically (i.e., frontal and lateral). In order not to add unneeded radiation for the patient and facilitate translation of this work to the clinic, 3D reconstructions based on the clinically obtained X-ray incidences (frontal and lateral) were proposed.
3D reconstruction methods based on the two X-rays (frontal and lateral) were developed for the spine (Aubin et al., 1997; Mitton et al., 2000; Pearcy, 1985; Pomero et al., 2004), the knee (Laporte et al., 2003) and, more recently, the rib cage (Benameur et al., 2005; Laporte et al., 2004). The assessment of the rib reconstruction method proposed by Benameur et al. (2005) was limited because the results were compared with those by a previous stereoradiographic method (Dansereau and Stokes, 1988) because ribcage CT data were not available (Benameur et al., 2005).
The aims of this study were (i) to estimate the accuracy of the method presented by Laporte et al. (2004) by comparing 3D biplanar reconstructions with CT-scan reconstructions, and (ii) to evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of this method.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Three fresh-frozen human cadaveric thoraxes (age 75, 84, and 92 yrs) were obtained from the Mayo Foundation Anatomical Bequest Program (Rochester, MN, USA). The specimens were thawed at room temperature overnight. Fifty ribs from the three thoraxes (ribs, sternum and vertebrae) were used. Ribs 2–10 were used from two specimens and ribs 4–10 from the third specimen.
Results
Reference values obtained from CT scans were compared with parameters computed from the stereo-radiographic reconstructions and the differences for the three observers determined (Table 1).
The mean differences were for the length of the rib mid-line −6 mm [−2%], the maximum width 3 mm [4%], the chord length 0 mm [−0.2%] and the enclosed area 370 mm2 [3%] (difference=stereo-radiography–CT scan).
Regarding the inter-observer variability (computed from the three stereo-radiographic reconstructions),
Discussion
The relative mean differences were either positive or negative depending on the parameter considered. These differences were not only due to the stereo-radiographic technique but also done to the CT-scan reconstruction. The anterior limit of the rib is especially hard to define even in the CT scan. Therefore the CT scan, considered as a gold standard for the in vivo 3D reconstruction, is not an absolute reference. Thus, this study only leads to an approximation of the accuracy of the
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest for this study.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to acknowledge M. Martinet and M. Chauvet for their important technical support.
References (22)
- et al.
Measurements of the three-dimensional shape of the rib cage
J. Biomech.
(1988) - et al.
Spinal penetration index: new three-dimensional quantified reference for lordoscoliosis and other spinal deformities
J. Orthop. Sci.
(2003) - et al.
Explicit calibration method and specific device designed for stereoradiography
J. Biomech.
(2003) - et al.
Personalized biomechanical simulations of orthotic treatment in idiopathic scoliosis
Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon)
(2004) - et al.
Fast accurate stereoradiographic 3D-reconstruction of the spine using a combined geometric and statistic model
Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon)
(2004) - et al.
Morphometric evaluations of personalised 3D reconstructions and geometric models of the human spine
Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.
(1997) - et al.
Geometrical modeling of the spine and the thorax for the biomechanical analysis of scoliotic deformities using the finite element method
Ann. Chir.
(1995) - et al.
Three-dimensional biplanar reconstruction of scoliotic rib cage using the estimation of a mixture of probabilistic prior models
IEEE Trans. Bio-med. Eng.
(2005) - et al.
A novel system for the 3-D reconstruction of the human spine and rib cage from biplanar X-ray images
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
(2007) - et al.
Assessment of the 3-D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images
IEEE Trans. Bio-med. Eng.
(2003)
A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system
Bull. Acad. Natl. Med.
Cited by (33)
X-ray image calibration and its application to clinical orthopedics
2014, Medical Engineering and PhysicsCitation Excerpt :Moreover, the usage of simple scaling objects cannot be used to overcome the loss of depth. Therefore, more sophisticated approaches have been proposed in literature combining X-ray image calibration with 2D–3D reconstruction techniques [4–7]. 3D reconstruction of the scoliotic spine was proposed by Novosad et al. [4].
Non-destructive assessment of human ribs mechanical properties using quantitative ultrasound
2014, Journal of BiomechanicsMusculoskeletal imaging in progress: The EOS imaging system
2013, Joint Bone SpineRobust femur condyle disambiguation on biplanar X-rays
2012, Medical Engineering and PhysicsReliability of a new method for lower-extremity measurements based on stereoradiographic three-dimensional reconstruction
2012, Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and ResearchCitation Excerpt :Specially designed software included in the workstation allows three-dimensional (3D) modelling of the bone envelope and automatic calculation of specific clinical variables (Fig. 1). Biplanar stereoradiography and personalized modelling of the skeleton have been extensively developed for various anatomic regions including the lumbar spine [10], cervical spine [11], ribs [12], pelvis [13]. In a recent study, the use of this technique on lower extremities was validated on children [14].