Original contributionA randomized, double-blind, prospective study comparing the efficacy of continuous versus pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of lumbar facet syndrome☆
Introduction
Percutaneous lumbar facet joint denervation of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus by continuous radiofrequency (CRF) thermocoagulation results in significant pain relief and improved function [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), using a lower temperature application of energy, may offer comparable pain relief and cause less post-procedure discomfort, neuritis, or motor nerve damage [7], [8], [9], [10]. While the mechanism of action of PRF is speculative, recent evidence suggests that the electric fields reversibly disrupt transmission of nerve impulses across unmyelinated C-fibers and small myelinated fibers [7]. Pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation may allow the dissipation of heat, avoiding the complication of thermal injury, thereby decreasing post-procedure side effects [8], [9], [10]. Tekin et al. has indicated that duration of pain relief following PRF lesioning is less than that with CRF lesioning [11]. This study, is, to date, the first prospective, randomized, double-blinded comparison between CRF and PRF ablation performed in a United States level-I trauma center.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
After receiving institutional review board (IRB) approval from the Henry Ford Hospital's IRB, and after receiving patients' written, informed consent, we enrolled into the study 50 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients who were at least 18 years old, and had unilateral or bilateral lumbar back pain greater than one month in duration, with no radiating symptoms below the knee. Subjects were excluded from the study if they had a history of previous back surgery, presence of neurological
Results
A total of 50 patients received either CRF or PRF treatment equally divided between the two groups. Twenty-six patients (13 patients received CRF and 13 patients received PRF) completed their follow-up evaluation and their data were analyzed (Table 1). At baseline, there were no significant differences between the CRF and PRF groups with respect to VAS or OSW scores. No adverse events were encountered during CRF or PRF lesioning, and no complications were documented three months post-procedure.
Discussion
Low back pain affects two thirds of the adult population and is the most common cause of work-related disability [14]. Some 85% of patients with low back pain are never formally diagnosed with a patho-anatomic condition, which may lead to patient frustration and unresolved pain [14]. Lumbar facet syndrome has been described as a potential cause of mechanical low back pain and affects an estimated 4% to 8% of those low back pain patients without neurological deficits or radiographic evidence of
References (22)
- et al.
Efficacy of radiofrequency procedures for the treatment of spinal pain: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials
Reg Anesth Pain Med
(2001) - et al.
Pulsed radiofrequency application in treatment of chronic zygapophyseal joint pain
Spine J
(2003) The longer term effect of pulsed radiofrequency for neuropathic pain
Pain
(1999)- et al.
Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the Gasserian ganglion in patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia
Pain
(2003) Epidemiologic features of chronic low back pain
Lancet
(1999)- et al.
The efficacy of radiofrequency lesioning of the cervical spinal dorsal root ganglion in a double-blinded randomized study: no difference between 40 degrees C and 67 degrees C treatments
Pain
(1997) - et al.
Percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy of lumbar spinal facets: the results of 46 cases
Neurosurg Rev
(1997) - et al.
Percutaneous radiofrequency lumbar facet rhizotomy in mechanical low back pain syndrome
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
(1997) - et al.
Radiofrequency denervation of lumbar facet joints in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blinded, sham lesion-controlled trial
Clin J Pain
(2005) - et al.
Randomized trial of radiofrequency lumbar facet denervation for chronic low back pain
Spine
(1999)
Radiofrequency facet joint denervation in the treatment of low back pain: a placebo-controlled trial to assess efficacy
Spine
Cited by (100)
The efficacy and successful factors of pulsed radiofrequency treatment of lumbosacral radicular pain patients
2021, Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case ManagementPercutaneous pulsed radiofrequency treatment of dorsal root ganglion for treatment of lumbar facet syndrome
2020, Clinical Neurology and NeurosurgeryA comparison of pulsed radiofrequency and radiofrequency denervation for lumbar facet joint pain
2023, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
- ☆
Anesthesia Research Fund, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.