Original Article
Clinical comorbidity was specific to disease pathology, psychologic distress, and somatic symptom amplification

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To test the hypothesis that disease pathology, psychologic distress, and somatic symptom amplification separately influence health care use by investigating the patterns of comorbidity in patients with diabetes, anxiety, and upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), respectively.

Methods

Adult diabetes (n = 4,365), anxiety (13,421), and URTI (9,854) cases, and 15,000 randomly selected controls were identified from a 1-year national survey of general practice consultations. Comorbidity was based on a standard clinical morbidity classification used by general practitioners in actual consultations.

Results

In case–control analyses of 122 morbidities, the number of significant comorbid associations (P < .01) for diabetes was 30, anxiety was 72, and URTI was 49. These associations showed significant heterogeneity in the odds ratios estimated using Cochran's Q and I2 statistic, both between case groups and within each case group. Diabetes associations were stronger with peripheral vascular disease (odds ratio 2.7), candidiasis (2.5), cataract (2.4), obesity (2.2), and hypertension (1.7); anxiety with depressive disorder (4.1), affective psychosis (4.0), adjustment reaction (3.2), functional gastrointestinal disorders (2.5) and general symptoms (2.5); and URTI with nonspecific blood findings (5.5), bronchitis (5.2), and injury (3.5).

Conclusion

Our study shows patterns of clinical comorbidity specific to the case conditions that supports the hypothesis that different mechanisms (disease pathology, psychologic distress, and somatic symptom amplification) operate to influence consultation behavior and comorbidity.

Introduction

Some patients consult primary care regularly and about multiple problems. The reasons for such multiple consultations are likely to include the presence of underlying disease pathology, psychologic status, and the way in which common symptoms are interpreted, as well as attitudes towards health care. Disease pathology has been shown to have a high impact on health and health care use [1], [2], and multiple chronic diseases have been shown to be commonly prevalent together [3], [4]. Psychologic distress has been shown to play a key role in the presentation of symptoms [5], in somatization [6], and in association with specific medical conditions [7], [8]. An alternative but overlapping explanation to psychologic distress as a key factor in seeking consultation has been the concept of somatic symptom amplification. Whereas psychologic distress relates to mood and the associated negative affectivity or neuroticism, the concept of somatic symptom amplification is defined by hypervigilance of unpleasant body sensations and symptoms that may be weak but are perceived as pathologically abnormal [9]. Somatic symptom amplification also specifically relates to the enduring perceptual style or trait of the patient, which is independent of any coexisting psychologic distress, and which may be another reason as to why patients consult and consult with multiple problems.

Links between different morbidities and specified index conditions were originally defined by Feinstein as comorbidity [10]. Although patterns of comorbidity have been described for a range of chronic and psychologic disorders [11], [12], it is unclear whether these patterns are unique and distinct to that of the index condition or not, and whether the factors of disease pathology, psychologic distress, and somatic symptom amplification influence such comorbidity. Given the large range of different conditions and symptoms in the population [13], one might assume there would be little difference in the frequency and reasons for comorbid consultations related to these three factors.

Using indicative conditions to represent disease pathology, psychologic distress, and somatic symptom amplification, we have tested the hypothesis that there is no difference between these factors with respect to the associated comorbidity presented, using a national database of general practice consulters. In population-based general practice, the spectrum of problems seen ranges from symptoms, through self-limiting conditions, to chronic and life-threatening disorders [14], and this setting offers the opportunity to investigate the respective roles of these three factors. We have compared comorbidity in consulters with diabetes as an example of disease pathology, anxiety as an example of psychologic distress, and upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) as an example of somatic symptom amplification. URTI is a common self-limiting symptom that most people would not present to health care and which does not require specific intervention, and consultation with this condition was thus chosen as an indicator of somatic symptom amplification [15], [16]. The prior expectation was that diabetes would show the highest levels of comorbidity of a chronic disorder with cardiovascular disease [17], anxiety would show high levels of comorbidity across a range of conditions, both psychologic and clinical [12], [18], and upper respiratory tract infections lower levels of comorbidity generally [15], [16].

In the United Kingdom, all residents are registered with a family practitioner and so the clinical records in a general practice are a source of population-based data on all morbidity for which consultation is sought among its registered patients. Clinical records have been used to study health needs, health interventions, and health outcomes for individual diseases such as anxiety and depression [19] and diabetes mellitus [20]. Many practices code clinical contacts routinely using a standard classification that covers symptoms, minor illnesses, and chronic conditions. Such records of contact offer the potential to investigate consultations and the occurrence of comorbidity. We have used a large national database of such general practice records to describe the frequency and patterns of comorbidity, and to directly compare comorbidity associated with diabetes, anxiety, and URTI.

Section snippets

Morbidity statistics in general practice (MSGP) database

The MSGP is an anonymized database of computerized patient records collected as part of a national morbidity survey of primary care consultations in the United Kingdom. The UK Office of Population and Census Surveys, Royal College of General Practitioners and Department of Health collaborated to carry out the survey. Since the 1950s there have been four such surveys, each lasting 1 year, and these surveys represent population-based record of all-cause morbidity. For this study we have used the

Clinical comorbidity defined by morbidity count

All case groups had a higher proportion of people with a morbidity count of six or more compared with controls (Table 2). Within all case groups, this proportion varied with age, gender, and social class: higher in females than males, highest in those group aged 75 years and over, and highest in the lowest social class group (SEC IV and V).

After adjusting for the confounding effects of age, gender, and social class, all three case groups were significantly more likely to have medium and high

Discussion

In this study of population-based general practice consulters aged 18 years and over followed for 1 year, the proportion of people with a morbidity count of six or more was higher for all three case groups than controls. Females, older patients, and those of the lowest socioeconomic status had higher morbidity counts, but these factors did not explain the higher morbidity counts in any of the case groups compared with controls. Adjusting for age, gender, and social class, the anxiety group

Acknowledgments

U.T.K. has been supported by a Medical Research Council (UK) Training Fellowship.

References (43)

  • C. Hoffman et al.

    Persons with chronic conditions. Their prevalence and costs

    JAMA

    (1996)
  • K. Kroenke et al.

    Symptoms in the community. Prevalence, classification and psychiatric morbidity

    Arch Intern Med

    (1993)
  • C.D. Sherbourne et al.

    Comorbid anxiety disorder and the functioning and well-being of chronically ill patients of general medical providers

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • A.A. Guccione et al.

    The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham study

    Am J Public Health

    (1994)
  • A.J. Barsky et al.

    Functional somatic syndromes

    Ann Intern Med

    (1999)
  • U.T. Kadam et al.

    Clinical comorbidity in patients with osteoarthritis: a case–control study of general practice consulters in England & Wales

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2004)
  • A.J. van Balkom et al.

    Comorbidity of the anxiety disorders in a community-based older population in the Netherlands

    Acta Psychiatr Scand

    (2000)
  • L.M. Verbrugge et al.

    Exploring the iceberg: common symptoms and how people care for them

    Med Care

    (1987)
  • A. McCormick et al.

    Morbidity statistics from general practice: fourth national study 1991–92. Series MB5 No. 3. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys

    (1995)
  • A.J. Barsky et al.

    The amplification of somatic symptoms

    Psychosom Med

    (1988)
  • J.A. Beckman et al.

    Diabetes and atherosclerosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management

    JAMA

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text