Original ArticleClinical comorbidity was specific to disease pathology, psychologic distress, and somatic symptom amplification
Introduction
Some patients consult primary care regularly and about multiple problems. The reasons for such multiple consultations are likely to include the presence of underlying disease pathology, psychologic status, and the way in which common symptoms are interpreted, as well as attitudes towards health care. Disease pathology has been shown to have a high impact on health and health care use [1], [2], and multiple chronic diseases have been shown to be commonly prevalent together [3], [4]. Psychologic distress has been shown to play a key role in the presentation of symptoms [5], in somatization [6], and in association with specific medical conditions [7], [8]. An alternative but overlapping explanation to psychologic distress as a key factor in seeking consultation has been the concept of somatic symptom amplification. Whereas psychologic distress relates to mood and the associated negative affectivity or neuroticism, the concept of somatic symptom amplification is defined by hypervigilance of unpleasant body sensations and symptoms that may be weak but are perceived as pathologically abnormal [9]. Somatic symptom amplification also specifically relates to the enduring perceptual style or trait of the patient, which is independent of any coexisting psychologic distress, and which may be another reason as to why patients consult and consult with multiple problems.
Links between different morbidities and specified index conditions were originally defined by Feinstein as comorbidity [10]. Although patterns of comorbidity have been described for a range of chronic and psychologic disorders [11], [12], it is unclear whether these patterns are unique and distinct to that of the index condition or not, and whether the factors of disease pathology, psychologic distress, and somatic symptom amplification influence such comorbidity. Given the large range of different conditions and symptoms in the population [13], one might assume there would be little difference in the frequency and reasons for comorbid consultations related to these three factors.
Using indicative conditions to represent disease pathology, psychologic distress, and somatic symptom amplification, we have tested the hypothesis that there is no difference between these factors with respect to the associated comorbidity presented, using a national database of general practice consulters. In population-based general practice, the spectrum of problems seen ranges from symptoms, through self-limiting conditions, to chronic and life-threatening disorders [14], and this setting offers the opportunity to investigate the respective roles of these three factors. We have compared comorbidity in consulters with diabetes as an example of disease pathology, anxiety as an example of psychologic distress, and upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) as an example of somatic symptom amplification. URTI is a common self-limiting symptom that most people would not present to health care and which does not require specific intervention, and consultation with this condition was thus chosen as an indicator of somatic symptom amplification [15], [16]. The prior expectation was that diabetes would show the highest levels of comorbidity of a chronic disorder with cardiovascular disease [17], anxiety would show high levels of comorbidity across a range of conditions, both psychologic and clinical [12], [18], and upper respiratory tract infections lower levels of comorbidity generally [15], [16].
In the United Kingdom, all residents are registered with a family practitioner and so the clinical records in a general practice are a source of population-based data on all morbidity for which consultation is sought among its registered patients. Clinical records have been used to study health needs, health interventions, and health outcomes for individual diseases such as anxiety and depression [19] and diabetes mellitus [20]. Many practices code clinical contacts routinely using a standard classification that covers symptoms, minor illnesses, and chronic conditions. Such records of contact offer the potential to investigate consultations and the occurrence of comorbidity. We have used a large national database of such general practice records to describe the frequency and patterns of comorbidity, and to directly compare comorbidity associated with diabetes, anxiety, and URTI.
Section snippets
Morbidity statistics in general practice (MSGP) database
The MSGP is an anonymized database of computerized patient records collected as part of a national morbidity survey of primary care consultations in the United Kingdom. The UK Office of Population and Census Surveys, Royal College of General Practitioners and Department of Health collaborated to carry out the survey. Since the 1950s there have been four such surveys, each lasting 1 year, and these surveys represent population-based record of all-cause morbidity. For this study we have used the
Clinical comorbidity defined by morbidity count
All case groups had a higher proportion of people with a morbidity count of six or more compared with controls (Table 2). Within all case groups, this proportion varied with age, gender, and social class: higher in females than males, highest in those group aged 75 years and over, and highest in the lowest social class group (SEC IV and V).
After adjusting for the confounding effects of age, gender, and social class, all three case groups were significantly more likely to have medium and high
Discussion
In this study of population-based general practice consulters aged 18 years and over followed for 1 year, the proportion of people with a morbidity count of six or more was higher for all three case groups than controls. Females, older patients, and those of the lowest socioeconomic status had higher morbidity counts, but these factors did not explain the higher morbidity counts in any of the case groups compared with controls. Adjusting for age, gender, and social class, the anxiety group
Acknowledgments
U.T.K. has been supported by a Medical Research Council (UK) Training Fellowship.
References (43)
- et al.
Which chronic conditions are associated with better or poorer quality of life?
J Clin Epidemiol
(2000) - et al.
Comorbidity of chronic diseases in general practice
J Clin Epidemiol
(1993) - et al.
Multimorbidity in general practice: prevalence, incidence, and determinants of co-occurring chronic and recurrent diseases
J Clin Epidemiol
(1998) - et al.
Depression and somatisation: a review. Part I & II
Am J Med
(1982) The pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease
J Chronic Dis
(1970)- et al.
The amplification of somatic symptoms in upper respiratory tract infections
Gen Hosp Psychiatr
(2002) - et al.
Use of a cross-sectional survey to estimate outcome of health care: the example of anxiety and depression
J Clin Epidemiol
(2001) - et al.
Frequent consulters in general practice: a systematic review of studies of prevalence, associations and outcome
J Psychosom Res
(1999) - et al.
Somatizing frequent attenders in primary health care
J Psychosom Res
(2001) - et al.
Otitis media: relationship to tonsillitis, sinusitis and atopic diseases
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
(1996)